Dynamic Selection and Estimation of the Digital Predistorter Parameters for Power Amplifier Linearization | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Dynamic Selection and Estimation of the Digital Predistorter Parameters for Power Amplifier Linearization


Abstract:

This paper presents a new technique that dynamically estimates and updates the coefficients of a digital predistorter (DPD) for power amplifier (PA) linearization. The pr...Show More

Abstract:

This paper presents a new technique that dynamically estimates and updates the coefficients of a digital predistorter (DPD) for power amplifier (PA) linearization. The proposed technique is dynamic in the sense of estimating, at every iteration of the coefficient's update, only the minimum necessary parameters according to a criterion based on the residual estimation error. At the first step, the original basis functions defining the DPD in the forward path are orthonormalized for DPD adaptation in the feedback path by means of a precalculated principal component analysis (PCA) transformation. The robustness and reliability of the precalculated PCA transformation (i.e., PCA transformation matrix obtained off line and only once) is tested and verified. Then, at the second step, a properly modified partial least squares (PLS) method, named dynamic partial least squares (DPLS), is applied to obtain the minimum and most relevant transformed components required for updating the coefficients of the DPD linearizer. The combination of the PCA transformation with the DPLS extraction of components is equivalent to a canonical correlation analysis (CCA) updating solution, which is optimum in the sense of generating components with maximum correlation (instead of maximum covariance as in the case of the DPLS extraction alone). The proposed dynamic extraction technique is evaluated and compared in terms of computational cost and performance with the commonly used QR decomposition approach for solving the least squares (LS) problem. Experimental results show that the proposed method (i.e., combining PCA with DPLS) drastically reduces the amount of DPD coefficients to be estimated while maintaining the same linearization performance.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques ( Volume: 67, Issue: 10, October 2019)
Page(s): 3996 - 4004
Date of Publication: 03 July 2019

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Digital predistortion (DPD) linearization can overcome or at least mitigate the efficiency versus linearity tradeoff in power amplifiers (PAs). In order to avoid wasting excessive power resources when handling high peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) signals, high-efficient amplification architectures based on dynamic load or dynamic supply modulation have been adopted. Some of the most popular solutions proposed in the literature (and also adopted by the industry in some cases) include: envelope tracking PAs [1], Doherty PAs [2], load-modulated balanced amplifiers (LMBAs) [3], and LINC or outphasing PAs [4]. In either case, these highly efficient topologies require the use of linearization techniques to guarantee the linearity levels specified in the communication standards.

Select All
1.
Z. Wang, "Demystifying envelope tracking: Use for high-efficiency power amplifiers for 4G and beyond", IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 106-129, Apr. 2015.
2.
R. Pengelly, C. Fager and M. Ozen, "Doherty’s legacy: A history of the Doherty power amplifier from 1936 to the present day", IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 41-58, Feb. 2016.
3.
R. Quaglia and S. Cripps, "A load modulated balanced amplifier for telecom applications", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1328-1338, Mar. 2018.
4.
Z. Popovic and J. A. Garcia, "Microwave class-E power amplifiers: A brief review of essential concepts in high-frequency class-E PAs and related circuits", IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 54-66, Jul. 2018.
5.
P. L. Gilabert and G. Montoro, "3-D distributed memory polynomial behavioral model for concurrent dual-band envelope tracking power amplifier linearization", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 638-648, Feb. 2015.
6.
P. L. Gilabert, G. Montoro, T. Wang, M. N. Ruiz and J. A. García, "Order reduction of wideband digital predistorters using principal component analysis", IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Dig., pp. 1-7, Jun. 2013.
7.
P. L. Gilabert et al., "Comparison of model order reduction techniques for digital predistortion of power amplifiers", Proc. 46th Eur. Microw. Conf. (EuMC), pp. 182-185, Oct. 2016.
8.
P. L. Gilabert, D. López-Bueno and G. Montoro, "Spectral weighting orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm for enhanced out-of-band digital predistortion linearization", IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Exp. Briefs.
9.
Q. A. Pham, D. Lopez-Bueno, T. Wang, G. Montoro and P. L. Gilabert, "Multi-dimensional LUT-based digital predistorter for concurrent dual-band envelope tracking power amplifier linearization", Proc. IEEE Top. Conf. RF/Microw. Power Amplif. Radio Wireless Appl. (PAWR), pp. 47-50, Jan. 2018.
10.
P. L. Gilabert, A. Cesari, G. Montoro, E. Bertran and J.-M. Dilhac, "Multi-lookup table FPGA implementation of an adaptive digital predistorter for linearizing RF power amplifiers with memory effects", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 372-384, Feb. 2008.
11.
A. Molina, K. Rajamani and K. Azadet, "Concurrent dual-band digital predistortion using 2-D lookup tables with bilinear interpolation and extrapolation: Direct least squares coefficient adaptation", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1381-1393, Apr. 2017.
12.
N. Mrabet, I. Mohammad, F. Mkadem, C. Rebai and S. Boumaiza, "Optimized hardware for polynomial digital predistortion system implementation", Proc. IEEE Top. Conf. Power Amplif. Wireless Radio Appl., pp. 81-84, Jan. 2012.
13.
W. Cao, Y. Li and A. Zhu, "Magnitude-selective affine function based digital predistorter for RF power amplifiers in 5G small-cell transmitters", IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Dig., pp. 1539-1541, Jun. 2017.
14.
D. Wisell, J. Jalden and P. Handel, "Behavioral power amplifier modeling using the LASSO", Proc. IEEE Instrum. Meas. Technol. Conf., pp. 1864-1867, May 2008.
15.
L. Guan and A. Zhu, "Optimized low-complexity implementation of least squares based model extraction for digital predistortion of RF power amplifiers", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 594-603, Mar. 2012.
16.
J. Peng, S. He, B. Wang, Z. Dai and J. Pang, "Digital predistortion for power amplifier based on sparse Bayesian learning", IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Exp. Briefs, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 828-832, Sep. 2016.
17.
J. Reina-Tosina, M. Allegue-Martínez, C. Crespo-Cadenas, C. Yu and S. Cruces, "Behavioral modeling and predistortion of power amplifiers under sparsity hypothesis", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 745-753, Feb. 2015.
18.
P. Geladi and B. R. Kowalski, "Partial least-squares regression: A tutorial", Analytica Chim. Acta, vol. 185, pp. 1-17, Jan. 1986.
19.
H. Hotelling, "Relations betwen two sets of variates", Biometrika, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 321-377, Dec. 1936.
20.
D. López-Bueno, Q. A. Pham, G. Montoro and P. L. Gilabert, "Independent digital predistortion parameters estimation using adaptive principal component analysis", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 5771-5779, Dec. 2018.
21.
Q. A. Pham, D. López-Bueno, G. Montoro and P. L. Gilabert, "Adaptive principal component analysis for online reduced order parameter extraction in PA behavioral modeling and DPD linearization", IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Dig., pp. 160-163, Jun. 2018.
22.
Q. A. Pham, D. López-Bueno, T. Wang, G. Montoro and P. L. Gilabert, "Partial least squares identification of multi look-up table digital predistorters for concurrent dual-band envelope tracking power amplifiers", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 5143-5150, Dec. 2018.
23.
S. D. Muruganathan and A. B. Sesay, "A QRD-RLS-based predistortion scheme for high-power amplifier linearization", IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Exp. Briefs, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 1108-1112, Oct. 2006.
24.
Q. A. Pham, D. López-Bueno, G. Montoro and P. L. Gilabert, "Dynamic selection and update of digital predistorter coefficients for power amplifier linearization", Proc. IEEE Top. Conf. RF/Microw. Power Amplif. Radio Wireless Appl. (PAWR), pp. 1-4, Jan. 2019.
25.
D. R. Morgan, Z. Ma, J. Kim, M. G. Zierdt and J. Pastalan, "A generalized memory polynomial model for digital predistortion of RF power amplifiers", IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 3852-3860, Oct. 2006.
26.
R. Rosipal and N. Krämer, "Overview and recent advances in partial least squares", Proc. Int. Stat. Optim. Perspect. Workshop, pp. 34-51, 2006.
27.
A. Phatak and F. de Hoog, "Exploiting the connection between PLS Lanczos methods and conjugate gradients: Alternative proofs of some properties of PLS", J. Chemometrics, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 361-367, 2002.
28.
R. N. Braithwaite, "General principles and design overview of digital predistortion" in Digital Processing for Front End in Wireless Communication and Broadcasting, Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge, Univ. Press, pp. 143-191, 2011.
29.
F. Westad, K. Diepold and H. Martens, "QR-PLSR: Reduced-rank regression for high-speed hardware implementation", J. Chemometrics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 439-451, 1996.
30.
J. Chen, G. Wang, Y. Shen and G. B. Giannakis, "Canonical correlation analysis of datasets with a common source graph", IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 16, pp. 4398-4408, Aug. 2018.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.