I. Introduction
The growing awareness of climate change and global warming has shifted automotive industries and manufacturers from internal combustion engines (ICE) to electric vehicles (EV). Despite being environmentally friendly, and a cheaper solution compared to ICE, the long charging time and range anxiety of EVs remain the major obstacles that slow down their mass adoption [1]. To ensure a short charging time for a large battery capacity, EV chargers are required to handle larger power. Another critical issue in the mass adoption of EVs is the availability of charging infrastructures. One of the solutions to this issue is the installation of an onboard charger (OBC). OBC enables EV users to charge to any utility source without having to rely on the availability of off-board charging stations [2]. However, power density becomes a crucial aspect as OBCs must be installed in a tight space under the hood of the vehicle [3], [4]. The U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) has set a specific target for OBC in terms of power density and reliability for the year 2025 which are 4.6 kW/L and 300 000 miles, respectively [5]. Many approaches to achieving high power density OBC have been proposed, such as increasing the switching frequency and using wide bandgap (WBG) devices [6], [7], introducing the single-stage approach [8], [9], [10], implementing system-level integration such as the integration between OBC and low voltage DC-DC converter (LDC) [11], [12], and applying magnetic integration techniques. [13], [14], [15]. With the two-stage structure [6], the power density improvement is limited even with comparably high switching frequency due to the use of bulky E-cap at the dc-link which occupies more than 30% of the footprint. Moreover, without a proper cooling method, electrolytic capacitors may have a shorter lifetime, resulting in lower system reliability [16].