Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Hybrid Event Shaping to Stabilize Periodic Hybrid Orbits | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Hybrid Event Shaping to Stabilize Periodic Hybrid Orbits


Abstract:

Many controllers for legged robotic systems leverage open- or closed-loop control at discrete hybrid events to enhance stability. These controllers appear in several well...Show More

Abstract:

Many controllers for legged robotic systems leverage open- or closed-loop control at discrete hybrid events to enhance stability. These controllers appear in several well studied phenomena such as the Raibert stepping controller, paddle juggling, and swing leg retraction. This work introduces hybrid event shaping (HES): a generalized method for analyzing and designing stable hybrid event controllers. HES utilizes the saltation matrix, which gives a closed-form equation for the effect that hybrid events have on stability. We also introduce shape parameters, which are higher order terms that can be tuned completely independently from the system dynamics to promote stability. Optimization methods are used to produce values of these parameters that optimize a stability measure. Hybrid event shaping captures previously developed control methods while also producing new optimally stable trajectories without the need for continuous-domain feedback.
Date of Conference: 23-27 May 2022
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 12 July 2022
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

In general, the walking and running gaits of legged robots are naturally unstable and challenging to control. Hybrid systems such as these are difficult to work with due to the discontinuities in state and dynamics that occur at hybrid events, such as toe touchdown. These discontinuities violate assumptions of standard controllers designed for purely continuous systems, and work is ongoing to adapt these controllers for hybrid systems [1], [2]. One strategy for hybrid control is to cancel out the effects of hybrid events by working with an invariant subsystem [3]–[5]. We propose instead that the effects of hybrid events are valuable due to rich control properties that can be used to stabilize trajectories of a hybrid system.

Select All
1.
B. Altm, P. Ojaghi and R. G. Sanfelice, "A model predictive con-trol framework for hybrid dynamical systems", IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 20, pp. 128-133, 2018.
2.
N. J. Kong, G. Council and A. M. Johnson, "iLQR for piecewise-smooth hybrid dynamical systems", IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, December 2021.
3.
W. Yang and M. Posa, "Impact invariant control with applications to bipedal locomotion", arXiv preprint, 2021.
4.
S. Burden, S. Revzen and S. Sastry, "Dimension reduction near periodic orbits of hybrid systems", IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, September 2011.
5.
G. Council, S. Yang and S. Revzen, "Deadbeat control with (almost) no sensing in a hybrid model of legged locomotion", International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems, pp. 475-480, 2014.
6.
D. Sternad, M. Duarte, H. Katsumata and S. Schaal, "Bouncing a ball: Tuning into dynamic stability", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 27, pp. 1163-84, 11 2001.
7.
A. Seyfarth, H. Geyer and H. Herr, "Swing-leg retraction: a simple control model for stable running", Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 206, no. 15, pp. 2547-2555, 2003.
8.
M. M. Ankarah, U. Saranh and A. Saranh, "Control of underac-tuated planar hexapedal pronking through a dynamically embedded slip monopod", IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 4721-4727, 2010.
9.
K. Green, R. Hatton and J. Hurst, "Planning for the unexpected: Explicitly optimizing motions for ground uncertainty in running", IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 2020.
10.
A. van der Schaft and J. Schumacher, "Complementarity modeling of hybrid systems", IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 43, no. 4, 1998.
11.
J. Lygeros, K. H. Johansson, S. Simic et al., "Dynamical properties of hybrid automata", IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2003.
12.
A. M. Johnson, S. A. Burden and D. E. Koditschek, "A hybrid systems model for simple manipulation and self-manipulation systems", The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1354-1392, 2016.
13.
D. Joyce, "On manifolds with corners" in Advances in Geometric Analysis ser. Advanced Lectures in Mathematics, International Press of Boston, Inc., vol. 21, pp. 225-258, 2012.
14.
M. Jeffrey, "Dynamics at a switching intersection: Hierarchy isonomy and multiple sliding", SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, vol. 13, pp. 1082-1105, 07 2014.
15.
S. N. Simic, K. H. Johansson, S. Sastry and J. Lygeros, "Towards a Geometric Theory of Hybrid Systems" in Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, pp. 421-436, 2000.
16.
J. Zhang, K. H. Johansson, J. Lygeros and S. Sastry, "Dynamical systems revisited: Hybrid systems with zeno executions" in Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000.
17.
M. Aizerman and F. Gantmacher, "Determination of Stability by Linear Approximation of a Periodic Solution of a System of Differential Equations With Discontinuous Right-hand Sides", The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 385-398, 1958.
18.
S. A. Burden, T. Libby and S. D. Coogan, "On contraction analysis for hybrid systems", arXiv preprint, 2018.
19.
R. Leine and H. Nijmeijer, Dynamics and Bifurcations of Non-Smooth Mechanical Systems, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2004.
20.
M. Hirsch, S. Smale and R. Devaney, Differential Equations Dynam-ical Systems and an Introduction to Chaos, Academic Press, 2012.
21.
P. Muller, "Calculation of lyapunov exponents for dynamic systems with discontinuities", Chaos Solitons & Fractals, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1671-1681, 1995.
22.
X. Wang and J. K. Hale, "On monodromy matrix computation", Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 190, no. 18, 2001.
23.
H. Asahara and T. Kousaka, "Stability analysis using monodromy matrix for impacting systems", IEICE Transactions of Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Science, vol. E101-A, no. 6, 2018.
24.
J. G. D. Karssen, M. Haberland, M. Wisse and S. Kim, "The optimal swing-leg retraction rate for running", IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 4000-4006, 2011.
25.
E. Tyrtyshnikov, A Brief Introduction to Numerical Analysis, Birkhauser Basel, 1997.
26.
P. Lancaster, "On eigenvalues of matrices dependent on a parameter", Numerische Mathematik, 1964.
27.
J. Nocedal and S. Wright, Numerical Optimization, Springer, 2006.
28.
M. Kelly, "An introduction to trajectory optimization: How to do your own direct collocation", SIAM Review, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 849-904, 2017.
29.
O. Von Stryk and R. Bulirsch, "Direct and indirect methods for trajectory optimization", Annals of Operations Research, vol. 37, pp. 357-373, 12 1992.
30.
C. R. Hargraves and S. W. Paris, "Direct trajectory optimization using nonlinear programming and collocation", Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 338-342, 1987.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.