Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
Structural Coupled Electromagnetic Sensing of Defects Diagnostic System | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Structural Coupled Electromagnetic Sensing of Defects Diagnostic System


Abstract:

Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) detection methods are widely used to detect pipeline defects. However, it is limited by the detection orientation and magnetization. Besides, ...Show More

Abstract:

Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) detection methods are widely used to detect pipeline defects. However, it is limited by the detection orientation and magnetization. Besides, bulky excitation systems are incapable of adapting to the complex detection environments. This article proposes a new electromagnetic structured coupling sensing of merging alternating current field measurement and MFL within a multiparameter system for different types of pipeline defects detection. In particular, a novel electromagnetic coupling sensor structure is proposed, which enables simultaneous interaction between the excitation modes of yoke and coil. Magnetic yoke is integrated to magnetizing the axial pipeline to detect the circumferential surface and subsurface defects while the coil excites the circumferential uniform alternating current field and recognizes the axial defect. The novel structured sensing is highly sensitive to the detection of both surface and subsurface defects. Simulation and experiments on defects in several samples have been conducted to validate the reliability and efficiency of the proposed system.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics ( Volume: 70, Issue: 1, January 2023)
Page(s): 951 - 964
Date of Publication: 09 February 2022

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The integrity assessment of pipelines has commanded significant attention in the oil and gas industry. However, in the service pipeline, structural damage, corrosion, and geometric discontinuity in a harsh environment will affect the transportation performance and safety [1], [2]. Fuel leakage in the pipeline may cause badly damage to the environment, resulting in explosion, fire, and even injuries of pipeline network. In particular, the detection and quantification of different defects exist challenging of nondestructive testing (NDT) in pipeline integrity diagnosis [3]–[5]. Among the NDT methods, magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing is invariably used for pipeline crack detection. However, the limitations of MFL are insensitivity to crack parallel to the magnetization direction while subsurface defects are difficult to be distinguished due to the ambiguity of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

Select All
1.
B. Omar, Z. Djamel and M. Hassani, "Inspections statistical and reliability assessment study of corroded pipeline", Eng. Failure Anal., vol. 100, pp. 1-10, 2019.
2.
Y. Sahraoui, R. Khelif and A. Chateauneuf, "Maintenance planning under imperfect inspections of corroded pipelines", Int. J. Press. Vessels Piping, vol. 104, pp. 76-82, 2013.
3.
R. Pohl, A. Erhard and H. J. Montag, "NDT techniques for railroad wheel and gauge corner inspection", NDT E Int., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 89-94, 2004.
4.
S. Razvarz, R. Jafari and A. Gegov, "A review on different pipeline defect detection techniques" in Flow Modelling and Control in Pipeline Systems, Cham, Switzerland:Springer, pp. 25-57, 2021.
5.
U. Ilueng, S. Shan, D. A. Foutch, S. Shan and D. A. Foutch, "Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) technology for natural gas pipeline inspection", NDT E Int., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 36-36, 1997.
6.
N. Kasai, A. Takada, K. Fukuoka, H. Aiyama and M. Hashimoto, "Quantitative investigation of a standard test shim for magnetic particle testing", NDT E Int., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 421-426, 2011.
7.
K. Fukuoka et al., "Consideration of multi-coil type magnetizer for detection of omnidirectional crack in magnetic particle testing", Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mechan., vol. 52, pp. 1537-1543, 2016.
8.
S. Shah and B. M. Mehtre, "An overview of vulnerability assessment and penetration testing techniques", J. Comput. Virology Hacking Techn., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 27-49, 2015.
9.
W. Li et al., "Analysis of the inducing frequency of a U-shaped ACFM system", NDT E Int., vol. 44, pp. 324-328, 2011.
10.
D. Topp and M. Smith, "Application of the ACFM inspection method to rail and rail vehicles", Insight, vol. 47, pp. 354-357, 2005.
11.
I. Z. Abidin, G. Y. Tian, J. Wilson, S. Yang and D. Almond, "Quantitative evaluation of angular defects by pulsed eddy current thermography", NDT E Int., vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 537-546, 2010.
12.
O. Lucia, P. Maussion, E. J. Dede and J. M. Burdio, "Induction heating technology and its applications: Past developments current technology and future challenges", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 2509-2520, May 2014.
13.
F. Marquez and C. Muoz, "A new approach for fault detection location and diagnosis by ultrasonic testing", Energies, vol. 13, no. 5, 2020.
14.
A. Hs et al., "Small electromagnetic acoustic transducer with an enhanced unique magnet configuration", NDT E Int., vol. 110, Mar. 2020.
15.
G. Bin, Y. He, W. Lok Woo, G. Yun Tian, J. Liu and Y. Hu, "Multidimensional tensor-based inductive thermography with multiple physical fields for offshore wind turbine gear inspection", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 6305-6315, Oct. 2016.
16.
D. M. Caetano et al., "High-resolution non-destructive test probes based on magnetoresistive sensors", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 7326-7337, Sep. 2019.
17.
C. Yang, B. Gao, Q. Ma, L. Xie, G. Y. Tian and Y. Yin, "Multi-layer magnetic focusing sensor structure for pulsed remote field eddy current", IEEE Sensors J., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 2490-2499, Apr. 2019.
18.
L. Wei, X. A. Yuan, G. Chen, J. Ge, X. Yin and K. Li, "High sensitivity rotating alternating current field measurement for arbitrary-angle underwater cracks", NDT E Int., vol. 79, pp. 123-131, 2016.
19.
W. Guo, B. Gao, G. Y. Tian and D. Si, "Physic perspective fusion of electromagnetic acoustic transducer and pulsed eddy current testing in non-destructive testing system", Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 378, no. 2182, 2020.
20.
S. S. Bang, Y. H. Lee and Y.-J. Shin, "Defect detection in pipelines via guided wave-based time–frequency-domain reflectometry", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 70, 2021.
21.
H. Li, B. Gao, L. Miao, D. Liu and W. L. Woo, "Multiphysics structured eddy current and thermography defects diagnostics system in moving mode", IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2566-2578, Apr. 2021.
22.
N. Zhang, C. Ye, L. Peng and Y. Tao, "Eddy current probe with three-phase excitation and integrated array TMR sensors", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 5325-5336, Jun. 2021.
23.
Y. Gotoh and N. Takahashi, "Three-dimensional FEM analysis of electromagnetic inspection of outer side defects on steel tube using inner coil", IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1733-1736, Apr. 2007.
24.
M. Toharaand and Y. Gotoh, "Inspection method of outer side defect in ferromagnetic steel tube by insertion-type electromagnetic sensor using square wave alternating magnetic field with DC bias", IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 57, no. 2, Feb. 2021.
25.
B. Liu et al., "Weak magnetic flux leakage: A possible method for studying pipeline defects located either inside or outside the structures", NDT E Int., vol. 74, pp. 81-86, 2015.
26.
Y. Gao, G. Y. Tian, K. Li, J. Ji, P. Wang and H. Wang, "Multiple cracks detection and visualization using magnetic flux leakage and eddy current pulsed thermography", Sensors Actuators A Phys., vol. 234, pp. 269-281, 2015.
27.
P. Daryabor and M. S. Saflzadeh, "Image fusion of ultrasonic and thermographic inspection of carbon/epoxy patches bonded to an aluminum plate", NDT E Int., vol. 90, pp. 1-10, Sep. 2017.
28.
K. Chen, B. Gao, G. Y. Tian, Y. Yang, C. Yang and Q. Ma, "Differential coupling double-layer coil for eddy current testing with high lift-off", IEEE Sensors J., vol. 21, no. 16, pp. 18146-18155, Aug. 2021.
29.
Y. Sun and Y. Kang, "The feasibility of MFL inspection for omni-directional defects under a unidirectional magnetization", Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mechan., vol. 33, no. 3/4, pp. 919-925, 2010.
30.
Q. Xiao, J. Feng, Z. Xu and H. Zhang, "Receiver signal analysis on geometry and excitation parameters of remote field eddy current probe", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 3088-3098, Mar. 2022.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.