Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
Greedy-Based Edge Collaboration Scheme for Improving Quality of Experience | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Greedy-Based Edge Collaboration Scheme for Improving Quality of Experience


Abstract:

Applications using the Internet of Things (IoT) are widely used in life and the number is increasing. These applications need lots of computation resources for service. H...Show More

Abstract:

Applications using the Internet of Things (IoT) are widely used in life and the number is increasing. These applications need lots of computation resources for service. However, IoT devices do not have enough computation resources. To solve this problem, edge server has been proposed. Edge server has the amount of computation resource than IoT devices and achieves low network delay. Nevertheless, the efficiency of task processing is degraded when the number of connected devices is large. For processing efficiency, collaboration schemes using other computing nodes have been studied. Collaboration schemes achieve high Quality of Experience (QoE) than local processing. However, the existing collaboration schemes do not consider computation or communication resources. Because these factors are not considered, existing collaboration schemes cannot select the optimal collaboration target for task processing. In this paper, we propose a greedy-based edge collaboration scheme for improving QoE. We first predict computation resource usage by the received task. Second, we determine collaboration based on the probabilistic model using the predicted resource. After the collaboration decision, finally, we collaborate based on the delay model according to the collaboration target. Experimental results show that the proposed scheme achieves high QoE compared to the existing collaboration schemes due to the success rate is high and completion time is low.
Date of Conference: 20-22 October 2021
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 07 December 2021
ISBN Information:
Print on Demand(PoD) ISSN: 2162-1233
Conference Location: Jeju Island, Korea, Republic of

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

In the past few years, Internet of Things (IoT) devices have grown rapidly [1]. IoT devices support our daily life using applications. These applications require the amount of computing resources to provide services [2]. However, due to the limited computing capabilities, IoT devices do not satisfy the requirements of the application. To fill computing resources, many researchers utilized edge servers. Edge server has enough computing resources than IoT devices [3]. In addition, the edge server achieves low network latency because the edge server is located close to the device. Enough computing resources and low network latency of the edge server can satisfy the requirements of the application. Nevertheless, the edge server does not have high processing efficiency for tasks when the number of connected devices is large. To solve this problem, collaboration scheme was proposed.

Select All
1.
V. Ovidiu and F. Peter, Building the Hyperconnected Society, [online] Available: http://www.internet-of-things-research.eu/pdf/Building_the_Hyperconnected_Society_IERC_2015_Cluster_eBook_978-87-93237-98-8_P_Web.pdf.
2.
H. Chang, A. Hari, S. Mukherjee and T. Lakshman, "Bringing the Cloud to the Edge", Proc. of Int. IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 1294-1302, May 2014.
3.
J. Wang, J. Pan, F. Esposito, P. Calym and Z. Yang, "Edge Cloud Offloading Algorithms: Issues Methods and Perspectives", ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 52, no. 1, Feb. 2019.
4.
B. Noble, M. Satyanarayanan, D. Narayanan, J. Tilton, J. Flinn and K. Walker, "Agile Application-Aware Adaptation for Mobility", ACM SIGOPS Operation Systems Review, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 276-287, Oct. 1997.
5.
M. Satyanarayanan, "Pervasive Computing: Vision and Challenges", IEEE Personal Communications, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 10-17, Aug. 2001.
6.
Announcing Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon ec2)-beta, [online] Available: https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2006/08/24/announcing-amazon-elastic-compute-cloud-amazon-ec2-beta/.
7.
H. Dinh, C. Lee, D. Niyato and P. Wang, "A Survey of Mobile Cloud Computing: Architecture Applications and Approaches", Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 13, no. 18, pp. 1587-1611, Dec. 2013.
8.
E. Cuervo, A. Balasubramanian, D. Cho, A. Wolman, S. Saroiu, R. Chanadra, et al., "MAUI: Making Smartphones Last Longer with Code Offload", Proc. of Int. Conference on Mobile Systems Applications and Services, pp. 49-62, Jun. 2010.
9.
R. Kemp, N. Palmer, T. Kielmann and H. Bal, "Cuckoo: A Computation Offloading Framework for Smartphones", Proc. of Int. Conference on Mobile Computing Applications and Services, pp. 59-79, Oct. 2012.
10.
S. Kosta, A. Aucinas, P. Hui, R. Mortier and X. Zhang, "ThinkAir: Dynamic Resource Allocation and Parallel Execution in the Cloud for Mobile Code Offloading", Proc. of Int. IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 945-953, Mar. 2012.
11.
Mobile-Edge Computing-Introductory Technical, ETSI, Sophia Antipolis, 2014.
12.
M. Satyanarayanan, P. Bahl, R. Caeres and N. Davies, "The Case for VM-Based Cloudlets in Mobile Computing", IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 14-23, Oct. 2009.
13.
F. Bonomi, R. Milito, J. Zhu and S. Addepalli, "Fog Computing and Its Role in the Internet of Things", Proc. of Int. the First Edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing, pp. 13-16, Aug. 2012.
14.
C. Sonmez, A. Ozgovde and C. Ersoy, "EdgeCloudSim: An Environment for Performance Evaluation of Edge Computing Systems", Proc. of Int. Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC), pp. 39-44, Aug. 2018.
15.
R. Calheiros, R. Ranjan, A. Beloglazov, C. Rose and R. Buyya, "CloudSim: A Toolkit for Modeling and Simulation of Cloud Computing Environments and Evaluation of Resource Provisioning Algorithms", Software: Practice and Experience, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 23-50, Jan. 2011.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.