Abstract:
We define a process called congealing in which elements of a dataset (images) are brought into correspondence with each other jointly, producing a data-defined model. It ...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
We define a process called congealing in which elements of a dataset (images) are brought into correspondence with each other jointly, producing a data-defined model. It is based upon minimizing the summed component-wise (pixel-wise) entropies over a continuous set of transforms on the data. One of the biproducts of this minimization is a set of transform, one associated with each original training sample. We then demonstrate a procedure for effectively bringing test data into correspondence with the data-defined model produced in the congealing process. Subsequently; we develop a probability density over the set of transforms that arose from the congealing process. We suggest that this density over transforms may be shared by many classes, and demonstrate how using this density as "prior knowledge" can be used to develop a classifier based on only a single training example for each class.
Published in: Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662)
Date of Conference: 15-15 June 2000
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 06 August 2002
Print ISBN:0-7695-0662-3
Print ISSN: 1063-6919
References is not available for this document.
Select All
1.
S. Amari, "Natural Gradient Works Efficiently in Learning", Neural Comp., vol. 10, pp. 251-276, 1998.
2.
Y. Amit, U. Grenander and M. Piccioni, "Structural Image Restoration Through Deformable Templates", J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., vol. 86, no. 414, pp. 376-387, Jun. 1991.
3.
T. Cover and J. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, John Wiley and Sons, 1991.
4.
G. E. Christensen, "Consistent Linear-Elastic Transformations for Image Matching", Inf. Proc. in Medical Imaging, vol. 1613, pp. 224-237, 1999-Jun.-Jul.
5.
B. J. Frey and N. Jojic, "Estimating Mixture Models of Images and Inferring Spatial Transformations Using the EM Algorithm", Proc. IEEE CVPR, pp. 416-422, 1999-June.
6.
U. Grenander, M. I. Miller and A. Srivastava, "Hilbert-Schmidt Lower Bounds for Estimators on Matrix Lie Groups for ATR", IEEE PAMI, vol. 20, no. 8, Aug. 1998.
7.
P. Grother, NIST Special Database 19 Handprinted Forms and Characters Database, March 1995.
8.
D. P. Huttenlocher, G. A. Klanderman and W. J. Rucklidge, "Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance", IEEE PAMI, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 850-863, Sept. 1993.
9.
Y. LeCun, L. D. Jackel, L. Bottou, A. Brunot, C. Cortes, J. S. Denker, et al., "Comparison of learning algorithms for handwritten digit recognition", Inter. Conf. on Artificial Neural Networks, pp. 53-60, 1995.
10.
M. Revow, C. Williams and G. Hinton, "Using Generative Models for Handwritten Digit Recognition", IEEE PAMI, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 592-606, June 1996.
11.
P. Simard, Y. LeCun and J. Denker, "Efficient Pattern Recognition Using a New Transformation Distance", NIPS V Morgan Kaufmann Pub., pp. 50-58, 1993.
12.
V. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory, John Wiley and Sons, 1998.
13.
T. V. Vetter, M. J. Jones and T. Poggio, "A Bootstrapping Algorithm for Learning Linear Models of Object Classes", Proc. IEEE CVPR, pp. 40-46, 1997.
14.
P. Viola and W. M. Wells, "Mutual information: An approach for the registration of object models and images", Inter. J. Comp. Vis., 1997.