Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
A New Approach to the Online Estimation of the Loss of Generation Size in Power Systems | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

A New Approach to the Online Estimation of the Loss of Generation Size in Power Systems


Abstract:

Following an unintended disconnection of a synchronous generator from the power system, what is also known as a loss of generation (LoG), it is not trivial to precisely e...Show More

Abstract:

Following an unintended disconnection of a synchronous generator from the power system, what is also known as a loss of generation (LoG), it is not trivial to precisely estimate the post-event power system's inertia and the LoG size. One of the reasons for that is that both of them are a function of the unknown inertia reduction. To solve this challenging problem, this paper presents an analytical method based on the rate-of-change-of-frequency (RoCoF). The method relies on a modified swing equation, allowing a simultaneous estimation of both unknowns. To this end, the values of mechanical starting time, apparent power, and loading of lost generator are formulated for the power system under study. In a practical application, the method can use RoCoF measured by phasor measurement units. The paper discusses the impact of various frequency estimation approaches to the proposed LoG estimation. Furthermore, a new method for LoG size estimation, based on the interpolated estimated inertial response, is proposed. The efficiency of the proposed approach is validated through extensive simulations with Matlab/Simulink using a simple power system and the IEEE 39-bus test network.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Power Systems ( Volume: 34, Issue: 3, May 2019)
Page(s): 2103 - 2113
Date of Publication: 04 November 2018

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Loss of generation (LoG) can cause frequency instability and this phenomenon is of particular interest for future power systems characterized by high penetration of power-electronic-interfaced renewable generation that produces a reduction of the system's inertia [1]. Enhanced frequency control mechanisms are expected to provide fast frequency response to mitigate the consequences associated to the system inertia reduction and these control mechanisms do require a suitable coupling with wide-area monitoring and control systems [1], [2]. As well-known, the inertial response (IR) in power systems comes from the kinetic energy stored in the rotating shaft of SGs and rotating electrical motors from the demand side. Immediately after a LoG, the lost power is supplied by the IR and after that by the SGs governors [3]. In the other hand, under-frequency load shedding (UFLS) has been commonly used for preventing frequency instability following severe contingencies. In conventional UFLS schemes, non-critical loads are sequentially shed, based on a-priori assumptions and past experience [4]. However, it is essential to minimize the amount of load to be shed using adaptive mechanisms [5]–[9]. In the framework introduced in [5], the optimal load shedding plan can be created based on the estimated power imbalance using the swing equation. In [6], the LoG size is estimated by considering voltage dependency of the loads for adjusting the adaptive UFLS schemes in order to utilize as much as possible the primary frequency support. In [7] a strategy for updating the estimated LoG during load shedding process through the system's inertia constant estimation is introduced. In [8], load shedding amount is analytically derived by solving the swing equation considering ramp-shape governor response to achieve minimal load shed. Recently, an improved UFLS is presented. It is based on the calculation of power imbalance during load shedding process using equivalent swing equation of power system [9].

Select All
1.
Sep. 01, 2018, [online] Available: https://www.nationalgrideso.com/innovation/projects/enhanced-frequency-control-capability-efcc.
2.
R. Azizipanah-Abarghooee, M. Malekpour, M. Zare and V. Terzija, "A new inertia emulator and fuzzy-based LFC to support inertial and governor responses using Jaya algorithm", Proc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. General Meeting, pp. 1-5, 2016.
3.
P. Kundur, N. J. Balu and M. G. Lauby, Power System Stability and Control, New York, NY, USA:McGraw-Hill, 1994.
4.
P. M. Anderson and A. A. Fouad, Power System Control and Stability, Hoboken, NJ, USA:IEEE Press, 2003.
5.
V. V. Terzija, "Adaptive underfrequency load shedding based on the magnitude of the disturbance estimation", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1260-1266, Aug. 2006.
6.
U. Rudez and R. Mihalic, "Monitoring the first frequency derivative to improve adaptive underfrequency load-shedding schemes", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 839-846, May 2011.
7.
A. Ketabi and M. Hajiakbari Fini, "An underfrequency load shedding scheme for hybrid and multiarea power systems", IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 82-91, Jan. 2015.
8.
Y. Tofis, S. Timotheou and E. Kyriakides, "Minimal load shedding using the swing equation", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 2466-2467, May 2017.
9.
J. Jallad, S. Mekhilef, H. Mokhlis and J. A. Laghari, "Improved UFLS with consideration of power deficit during shedding process and flexible load selection", IET Renew. Power Gen., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 565-575, 2018.
10.
M. Lotfalian et al., "Inertial governor and AGC/economic dispatch load flow simulations of loss of generation contingencies", IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-104, no. 11, pp. 3020-3028, Nov. 1985.
11.
T. Inoue, H. Taniguchi, Y. Ikeguchi and K. Yoshida, "Estimation of power system inertia constant and capacity of spinning-reserve support generators using measured frequency transients", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 136-143, Feb. 1997.
12.
V. Terzija, M. Kayikci and D. Cai, "Power imbalance estimation in distribution networks with renewable energy resources", Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Exhib. Elect. Distrib. Part 1, pp. 1-14, 2009.
13.
P. Wall and V. Terzija, "Simultaneous estimation of the time of disturbance and inertia in power systems", IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 2018-2031, Aug. 2014.
14.
P. M. Ashton, C. S. Saunders, G. A. Taylor, A. M. Carter and M. E. Bradley, "Inertia estimation of the GB power system using synchrophasor measurements", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 701-709, Mar. 2015.
15.
D. Zografos and M. Ghandhari, "Estimation of power system inertia", Proc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. General Meeting, pp. 1-5, 2016.
16.
D. Zografos and M. Ghandhari, "Power system inertia estimation by approaching load power change after a disturbance", Proc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. General Meeting, pp. 1-5, 2017.
17.
Y. C. Chen, S. V. Dhople, A. D. Domínguez-García and P. W. Sauer, "Generalized injection shift factors", IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 2071-2080, Sep. 2017.
18.
D. Zografos, M. Ghandhari and R. Eriksson, "Power system inertia estimation: Utilization of frequency and voltage response after a disturbance", Elect. Power Syst. Res., vol. 161, pp. 52-60, Aug. 2018.
19.
S. Chakrabarti, E. Kyriakides, T. Bi, D. Cai and V. Terzija, "Measurements get together", IEEE Power Energy Mag, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 41-49, Jan./Feb. 2009.
20.
V. Terzija et al., "Wide-area monitoring protection and control of future electric power networks", Proc. IEEE, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 80-93, Jan. 2011.
21.
A. G. Phadke and B. Kasztenny, "Synchronized phasor and frequency measurement under transient conditions", IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 89-95, Jan. 2009.
22.
A. Derviskadic, P. Romano, M. Pignati and M. Paolone, "Architecture and experimental validation of a low-latency phasor data concentrator", IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, no. 4, pp. 2885-2893, Jul. 2016.
23.
C. J. Tavora and O. J. M. Smith, "Characterization of equilibrium and stability in power systems", IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-91, no. 3, pp. 1127-1130, May 1972.
24.
C. Concordia and S. Ihara, "Load representation in power system stability studies", IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-101, no. 4, pp. 969-977, Apr. 1982.
25.
W. W. Price, C. W. Taylor and G. J. Rogers, "Standard load models for power flow and dynamic performance simulation", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1302-1313, Aug. 1995.
26.
E. Welfonder, H. Weber and B. Hall, "Investigations of the frequency and voltage dependence of load part systems using a digital self-acting measuring and identification system", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 19-25, Feb. 1989.
27.
IEEE, C37.118.1-2011, "IEEE Standard for Synchrophasor Measurements for Power Systems", Dec. 2011.
28.
P. Romano and M. Paolone, "Enhanced interpolated-DFT for synchrophasor estimation in FPGAs: Theory implementation and validation of a PMU prototype", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Measur., vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 2824-2836, Dec. 2014.
29.
A. G. Phadke, J. S. Thorp and M. G. Adamiak, "A new measurement technique for tracking voltage phasors local system frequency and rate of change of frequency", IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-102, no. 5, pp. 1025-1038, May 1983.
30.
R. Boyer, "Primary governing and frequency control in ERCOT", Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. General Meeting, pp. 1-8, 2007.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.