Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
Assessment of Wind Speed Estimation From C-Band Sentinel-1 Images Using Empirical and Electromagnetic Models | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Assessment of Wind Speed Estimation From C-Band Sentinel-1 Images Using Empirical and Electromagnetic Models


Abstract:

Surface wind speed estimation from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data is principally based on empirical (EP) approaches, e.g., CMOD functions. However, it is necessary a...Show More

Abstract:

Surface wind speed estimation from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data is principally based on empirical (EP) approaches, e.g., CMOD functions. However, it is necessary and significant to compare radar backscattering modeling based on EP and electromagnetic (EM) approaches for enhancing the understanding of the physical processes between radar signal and sea surface, which is important for the design of radar sensors (e.g., cyclone global navigation satellite system). Indeed, through comparisons, it is worth noticing that the scattering of wave breaking is not taken into account in the physical modeling of radar backscattering. Surface wind speed is selected here as a reference parameter for investigating the difference between EP and EM models, due to its important role in radar backscattering modeling. In addition, wind speed estimates can be easily compared to in situ measurements. For EP approach, CMOD5.N and Komarov's model are selected for wind speed estimation from Sentinel-1 images. The CMOD5.N can offer wind speed estimates up to 25-35 m/s, while wind speed estimation based on Komarov's model does not require wind direction input. For EM approach, the asymptotic models, i.e., composite two-scale model, small-slope approximation (SSA), and resonant curvature approximation (RCA), are investigated for wind speed retrieval. They are studied with two models of surface roughness spectrum: semi-EP spectrum and EP model. In general, normalized radar cross section (NRCS) calculated by CMOD5.N and SSA/RCA is quite similar for incidence angles below 40° in vertical polarized and below 30° in horizontal polarized. For larger ones, significant NRCS deviations between two approaches are demonstrated, due to the lack of wave breaking scattering in EM models. As a result, wind speed estimates by CMOD5.N and SSA/RCA are very close for low and moderate incidence angles, while SSA-/RCA-based wind speeds are overestimated for larger ones.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing ( Volume: 56, Issue: 7, July 2018)
Page(s): 4075 - 4087
Date of Publication: 25 April 2018

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:


I. Introduction

Sea surface wind speed is an indispensable parameter for the studies of the other parameters [1]–[3], i.e., wave, current, and the coupling of oceanic and atmospheric systems. Likewise, it is a crucial factor for the studies of oil spill propagation [4] and vessel detection [5]. In particular, surface winds play an important role for modeling radar backscattering from sea surface. Among surface wind sources, i.e., in situ measurements from meteorological buoys/stations, numerical weather prediction models, scatterometers, synthetic aperture radars (SAR) at L-, C-, and X-band, are more and more exploited, since they can offer wind speed estimates at a high spatial resolution and in most meteorological conditions (day/night and cloud). In general, SAR-derived wind speed estimation has been principally based on empirical (EP) models, e.g., CMOD functions [6]–[9], since such approach is quite simple, and thus effective in obtaining wind speed estimates rapidly. Few studies mention wind speed retrieval through physical models, i.e., Bragg-scattering resonance [10], [11] and approximation models [12]–[14], since those models associated with many oceanic parameters (wave spectrum and sea water permittivity) are complex, and thus are not relevant for wind speed estimation from SAR data. Nevertheless, through theoretical calculations, one can understand more deeply physical processes between radar backscattering and sea surface roughness which is strongly influenced by near-surface winds. In spite of two different approaches, the comparison between EP and physical models is necessary and relevant for understanding which elements have not been taken into account in radar backscattering modeling, and then it permits to improve the calculations of physical processes (i.e., reflection and dispersion) between radar signal and sea surface. The latter is particularly significant for the design of radar sensors [15]. For instance, the design of the cyclone global navigation satellite system [16] is based on the hybrid model which is constructed from the physical and EP calculations of radar backscattering from the sea surface. Surface wind speed is the selected parameter for the comparison of EP and physical models due to its important role in modeling radar backscattering from sea surface roughness. In addition, wind speed estimates can be easily compared to available in situ measurements. Though the comparison of wind speed estimates based on EP and physical models has been reported in [17]–[19], it is not still adequate to conclude the performance of the physical models in radar backscattering modeling, since the approximation models [12]–[14], especially resonant curvature approximation (RCA) [14], have not been mentioned. Hence, for an overview, this paper proposes the comparison of wind speed estimate-based EP and physical approaches including the approximation models.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.