Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/autoload/mtable.js
Current Transformers Effects on the Measurement of Harmonic Active Power in LV and MV Networks | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Current Transformers Effects on the Measurement of Harmonic Active Power in LV and MV Networks


Abstract:

The harmonic active power is used to determine the location of polluting loads, the direction of harmonic power flow and to estimate how consequential a certain current h...Show More

Abstract:

The harmonic active power is used to determine the location of polluting loads, the direction of harmonic power flow and to estimate how consequential a certain current harmonic source is. The highest uncertainties, when measuring harmonic active power, are introduced by the current and voltage transducers. This paper presents experimental results which show the impact of current transformers (CTs) on the accuracy of the harmonic power measurements. An expression for the evaluation of the power error in distorted conditions was developed which can be easily utilized in the case of linear current transducers. It is shown how CTs cannot be considered linear transducers and how the higher the absolute value of the CT phase angle error is, the higher becomes the harmonic power error. The harmonic power error reaches maximum value when the phase shift between the voltage and current harmonic nears . Even high accuracy class CTs may not be adequate enough to assist on harmonic power measurement, while linear current transducers will perform satisfactorily.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery ( Volume: 26, Issue: 1, January 2011)
Page(s): 360 - 368
Date of Publication: 28 October 2010

ISSN Information:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Different approaches for harmonic sources detection have been presented in literature. They can be mainly divided in single-point and multi-point methods (i.e., based on measurement performed in one metering location or in multiple metering locations, respectively) [1]–[7]. Most of the described techniques are based on the measurement of the sign of the harmonic active power. When the sign is positive, the harmonic disturbances are due to nonlinear loads external to the monitored load, and the dominant harmonic source is located within the power grid upstream the metering station; otherwise, when its value is negative, the harmonic disturbance is predominantly due to the load, thus the dominant harmonic source is located downstream the metering station. This method is also suggested by the modern standards concerning the definitions for the measurement of electric power quantities in distorted conditions [8]. The -order harmonic active power [8] is P_{h} = {1\over kT}\int_o^{kT} {v_{h} i_{h} dt} = V_{h} I_{h} \cos (\theta _{h}) \eqno{\hbox{(1)}}

where is a positive integer number, is the cycle (s), v_{h} = \sqrt 2 V_{h} \sin (h\omega t + \beta _{h}) \eqno{\hbox{(2)}}
is the instantaneous -order harmonic voltage i_{h} = \sqrt 2 I_{h} \sin (h\omega t + \alpha _{h}) \eqno{\hbox{(3)}}
is the instantaneous -order harmonic current and is the phase shift between the harmonic phasors voltage and current. and are the rms value and the phase angle of the -order harmonic voltage; and are the rms amplitude and the phase angle of the -order harmonic current. The total harmonic active power is: P_{H} = \sum_{h \ne 1} {P_{h}} = P - P_{1} \eqno{\hbox{(4)}}
where is the total active power in the circuit [8].

Select All
1.
P. J. Rens and P. H. Swart, "On techniques for the localisationof multiple distortion sources in three-phase systems. Time domain verification", ETEP, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 317-322, Sep./Oct. 2001.
2.
L. Cristaldi, A. Ferrero and S. Salicone, "A distributed system for electricpower quality measurement", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 776-781, Aug. 2002.
3.
Review of Methods for Measurement and Evaluation of Harmonic Emission Level From an Individual Distorting Load CIGRE, Jan. 1999.
4.
M. Aiello, A. Cataliotti, V. Cosentino and S. Nuccio, "A self-synchronizing instrumentfor harmonic sources detection in power systems", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 15-23, Feb. 2005.
5.
C. Muscas, L. Peretto, S. Sulis and R. Tinarelli, "Investigation on multi-point measurementtechniques for PQ monitoring", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1684-90, Oct. 2006.
6.
J. H. Pretorius, J. D. van Wyk and P. H. Swart, "An evaluation of some alternativemethods of power resolution in a large industrial plant", IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 99-106, Jul. 2000.
7.
A. Cataliotti, V. Cosentino and S. Nuccio, "Comparison of nonactive powersfor the detection of dominant harmonic sources in power systems", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1554-1561, Aug. 2008.
8.
"IEEE Std. 1459-2010", IEEE Trial-Use Standard Definitions for the Measurement of Electric Power Quantities Under Sinusoidal Nonsinusoidal Balanced or Unbalanced Condition, Feb. 2010.
9.
Transformers and instruments for measuring harmonics.
10.
A. Cataliotti, V. Cosentino and S. Nuccio, "A virtual instrument for themeasurement of IEEE Std 1459–2000 power quantities", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 85-94, Jan. 2008.
11.
A. E. Emanuel and J. A. Orr, "Current harmonics measurementby means of current transformer", IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1318-25, Jul. 2007.
12.
Instrument TransformersPart 1: Current Transformers EN 60044-1 Ed., 2002.
13.
"IEC 61000-4-30, 2003", Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Part 430: Testing and Measurement TechniquesPower Quality Measurement Methods, Oct. 2008.
14.
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Part 47: Testing and Measurement TechniquesGeneral Guide on Harmonics and Interharmonics Measurements and Instrumentation for Power Supply Systems and Equipment Connected Thereto. IEC 61000-4-7 2000, Aug. 2002.
15.
Method and apparatus for calibrating transducers/amplifier systems, May 1991.
16.
D. Gallo, C. Landi and M. Luiso, "Large bandwidth compensation of current transformers", Proc. IEEE IMTC, pp. 86-91, 2009-May-57.
17.
D. Slomovitz and H. de Souza, "Shielded electronic currenttransformer", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 500-502, Apr. 2005.
18.
A. Cataliotti, D. Di Cara, A. E. Emanuel and S. Nuccio, "A novel approach to currenttransformer characterization in the presence of harmonic distortion", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1446-1453, May 2009.
19.
A. Cataliotti, D. Di Cara, A. E. Emanuel and S. Nuccio, "Characterization of clamp-oncurrent transformers under nonsinuosidal conditions", IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 373-380, Jan. 2009.
20.
A. Cataliotti, D. Di Cara, A. E. Emanuel and S. Nuccio, "Influence of current transformerson the measurement of harmonic active power", Proc. 16th IMEKO TC4 Symp., pp. 311-314, 2008-Sept.-2224.
21.
A. Cataliotti, D. Di Cara, A. E. Emanuel and S. Nuccio, "Improvement of Hall effectcurrent transducer metrological performances in the presence of harmonic distortion", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1091-97, May 2010.
22.
"Test systems for harmonic modeling and simulation", IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 579-587, Apr. 1999.
23.
D. Georgakopoulos and P. S. Wright, "Calibration of energy and powermeters under non-sinusoidal conditions", Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng. Sci. Meas. Technol., vol. 153, no. 6, pp. 241-247, Nov. 2006.
24.
S. Nuccio and C. Spataro, "A Monte Carlo method for theauto-evaluation of the uncertainties in the analog-to-digital conversion-basedmeasurements", Proc. Int. J. Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 148-158, 2004.
25.
N. Locci and C. Muscas, "Hysteresis and Eddy currentscompensation in current transformers", IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 154-159, Apr. 2001.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.