Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Online Layer-Aware Joint Request Scheduling, Container Placement, and Resource Provision in Edge Computing | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Online Layer-Aware Joint Request Scheduling, Container Placement, and Resource Provision in Edge Computing


Abstract:

Containers have emerged as a pivotal tool for service deployment in edge computing. Before running the container, an image composed of several layers must exist locally. ...Show More

Abstract:

Containers have emerged as a pivotal tool for service deployment in edge computing. Before running the container, an image composed of several layers must exist locally. Recent strategies have utilized layer-sharing in images to reduce deployment delays. However, existing research only focuses on a single aspect of container orchestration, like container placement, neglecting the joint optimization of the entire orchestration process. To fill in such gaps, this article introduces an online strategy that considers layer-aware container orchestration, encompassing request scheduling, container placement, and resource provision. The goal is to reduce costs, adapt to evolving user demands, and adhere to system constraints. We present an online optimization problem that accounts for various real-world factors in orchestration, including container and server expenses. An online algorithm is proposed, integrating a regularization-based approach and stepwise rounding to address this optimization problem efficiently. The regularization approach separates time-dependent container placement and server wake-up costs, requiring only current information and past decisions. The stepwise rounding process generates feasible solutions that meet system constraints, reducing computational costs. Additionally, a competitive ratio proof is provided for the proposed algorithm. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that our approach achieves about 20% performance enhancement compared to baseline algorithms.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Services Computing ( Volume: 18, Issue: 1, Jan.-Feb. 2025)
Page(s): 328 - 341
Date of Publication: 21 November 2024

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Edge computing leverages various clusters deployed at the edge of the network [1], thereby significantly enhancing the capabilities of the core network to support data-intensive and delay-sensitive applications [2], [3]. To enable efficient service deployment at the edge, container technology has emerged as a solution for hosting services [4], [5], [6], [7]. A container-based service bundles all essential components into its container image, which comprises layers representing changes to the file system, including additions, deletions, and modifications [8]. Upon receiving a user request, it is scheduled to the edge cluster, where the container is placed, and the necessary resources are provisioned to run the container. If the edge cluster lacks the locally stored layers of the container image, they must be downloaded from a remote cloud-based registry [9], [10]. Hence, to deliver services to users through containers, container orchestration is essential, involving the following three main steps: 1) Scheduling user requests, 2) Placing containers in edge clusters, and 3) Provisioning resources in edge clusters.

Select All
1.
W. Z. Khan et al., "Edge computing: A survey", Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 97, pp. 219-235, 2019.
2.
M. Billinghurst et al., "A survey of augmented reality", Found. Trends Hum.–Comput. Interaction, vol. 8, no. 2/3, pp. 73-272, 2015.
3.
J. Wang, J. Liu and N. Kato, "Networking and communications in autonomous driving: A survey", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1243-1274, 2019.
4.
Z. Tang, X. Zhou, F. Zhang, W. Jia and W. Zhao, "Migration modeling and learning algorithms for containers in fog computing", IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 712-725, Sep./Oct. 2019.
5.
L. Ma, S. Yi, N. Carter and Q. Li, "Efficient live migration of edge services leveraging container layered storage", IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 2020-2033, Sep. 2019.
6.
S. Wang, Y. Guo, N. Zhang, P. Yang, A. Zhou and X. Shen, "Delay-aware microservice coordination in mobile edge computing: A reinforcement learning approach", IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 939-951, Mar. 2021.
7.
A. M. Potdar, D. Narayan, S. Kengond and M. M. Mulla, "Performance evaluation of docker container and virtual machine", Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 171, pp. 1419-1428, 2020.
8.
2018, [online] Available: https://www.docker.com/resources/what-container/.
9.
A. Anwar et al., "Improving docker registry design based on production workload analysis", Proc. 16th USENIX Conf. File Storage Technol., pp. 265-278, 2018.
10.
Z. Tang, J. Lou and W. Jia, "Layer dependency-aware learning scheduling algorithms for containers in mobile edge computing", IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 3444-3459, Jun. 2023.
11.
A. Tomassilli, F. Giroire, N. Huin and S. Pérennes, "Provably efficient algorithms for placement of service function chains with ordering constraints", Proc. 2018 IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun., pp. 774-782, 2018.
12.
U. Pongsakorn, Y. Watashiba, K. Ichikawa, S. Date and H. Iida, "Container rebalancing: Towards proactive linux containers placement optimization in a data center", Proc. IEEE 41st Annu. Comput. Softw. Appl. Conf., pp. 788-795, 2017.
13.
Y. Mao, J. Oak, A. Pompili, D. Beer, T. Han and P. Hu, "DRAPS: Dynamic and resource-aware placement scheme for docker containers in a heterogeneous cluster", Proc. IEEE 36th Int. Perform. Comput. Commun. Conf., pp. 1-8, 2017.
14.
S. Vaucher, R. Pires, P. Felber, M. Pasin, V. Schiavoni and C. Fetzer, "SGX-aware container orchestration for heterogeneous clusters", Proc. IEEE 38th Int. Conf. Distrib. Comput. Syst., pp. 730-741, 2018.
15.
P. Kayal and J. Liebeherr, "Distributed service placement in fog computing: An iterative combinatorial auction approach", Proc. IEEE 39th Int. Conf. Distrib. Comput. Syst., pp. 2145-2156, 2019.
16.
L. Wang, L. Jiao, T. He, J. Li and M. Mühlhäuser, "Service entity placement for social virtual reality applications in edge computing", Proc. 2018 IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun., pp. 468-476, 2018.
17.
E. Oakes et al., "SOCK: Rapid task provisioning with serverless-optimized containers", Proc. 2018 USENIX Annu. Tech. Conf., pp. 57-70, 2018.
18.
Y. Li, B. An, J. Ma and D. Cao, "Comparison between chunk-based and layer-based container image storage approaches: An empirical study", Proc. 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Service-Oriented Syst. Eng., pp. 197-1975, 2019.
19.
Z. Tang, F. Mou, J. Lou, W. Jia, Y. Wu and W. Zhao, "Multi-user layer-aware online container migration in edge-assisted vehicular networks", IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 1807-1822, Apr. 2024.
20.
J. Lou, H. Luo, Z. Tang, W. Jia and W. Zhao, "Efficient container assignment and layer sequencing in edge computing", IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1118-1131, Mar./Apr. 2023.
21.
L. Gu, D. Zeng, J. Hu, B. Li and H. Jin, "Layer aware microservice placement and request scheduling at the edge", Proc. 2021 IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun., pp. 1-9, 2021.
22.
L. Gu, D. Zeng, J. Hu, H. Jin, S. Guo and A. Y. Zomaya, "Exploring layered container structure for cost efficient microservice deployment", Proc. 2021 IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun., pp. 1-9, 2021.
23.
X. Tian, H. Meng, Y. Shen, J. Zhang, Y. Chen and Y. Li, "Dynamic microservice deployment and offloading for things-edge-cloud computing", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 19537-19548, Jun. 2024.
24.
S. Albers, "On energy conservation in data centers", ACM Trans. Parallel Comput., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1-26, 2019.
25.
A. Borodin and R. El-Yaniv, Online Computation and Competitive Analysis, Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005.
26.
L. Gu, Z. Chen, H. Xu, D. Zeng, B. Li and H. Jin, "Layer-aware collaborative microservice deployment toward maximal edge throughput", Proc. 2022 IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun., pp. 71-79, 2022.
27.
H. Tan, Z. Han, X.-Y. Li and F. C. Lau, "Online job dispatching and scheduling in edge-clouds", Proc. 2017 IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun., pp. 1-9, 2017.
28.
F. A. Salaht, F. Desprez and A. Lebre, "An overview of service placement problem in fog and edge computing", ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1-35, 2020.
29.
H. Sami, A. Mourad, H. Otrok and J. Bentahar, "Demand-driven deep reinforcement learning for scalable fog and service placement", IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 2671-2684, Sep./Oct. 2022.
30.
S. Wang, Z. Ding and C. Jiang, "Elastic scheduling for microservice applications in clouds", IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 98-115, Jan. 2021.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.