Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
A Deep Long Short-Term Memory Network Embedded Model Predictive Control Strategies for Car-Following Control of Connected Automated Vehicles in Mixed Traffic | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

A Deep Long Short-Term Memory Network Embedded Model Predictive Control Strategies for Car-Following Control of Connected Automated Vehicles in Mixed Traffic


Abstract:

This paper proposes a framework for deep Long Short-Term Memory (D-LSTM) network embedded model predictive control (MPC) for car-following control of connected automated ...Show More

Abstract:

This paper proposes a framework for deep Long Short-Term Memory (D-LSTM) network embedded model predictive control (MPC) for car-following control of connected automated vehicles (CAVs) in traffic mixed with human-driven vehicles (HDVs) and CAVs. The framework consists of: 1) lead HDV trajectory prediction through D-LSTM; and 2) CAV car-following control via MPC based on the predicted vehicle trajectory. For the trajectory prediction, two D-LSTM structures are developed based on the availability of preceding vehicle information: 1) ‘sufficient’ historical information of the position and speed of multiple vehicles ahead; and 2) ‘insufficient’ information where preceding vehicle information is unavailable (e.g., due to failed communication). Based on the prediction, a distributed MPC is designed for each scenario by incorporating the predicted trajectory into state space construction. The proposed D-LSTM models are trained and tested with the NGSIM data for validation. Numerical simulation results for various traffic conditions suggest that the proposed strategies perform better than traditional MPC methods in terms of control objective cost reduction, smoother control, and stabilizing effect. The results also indicate that the sufficient information case outperforms the insufficient information case as expected, which highlights the importance of stable communication.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems ( Volume: 25, Issue: 7, July 2024)
Page(s): 8209 - 8220
Date of Publication: 18 June 2024

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Connected automated vehicles (CAVs), equipped with advanced communication and automated functions, holds promise to improve microscopic vehicle maneuvers and consequently system-wide traffic performance. Particularly, the longitudinal control of CAVs brings a great opportunity to improve traffic flow throughput and stability (e.g., [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]) via precise vehicle control, cooperative sensing, and communication. To this end, many CAV car-following (CF) control algorithms, namely adaptive cruise control (ACC) or cooperative ACC (CACC; with communication function), have been developed aiming to improve the CF performance, fuel consumption, and stability (e.g. [3], [8], [9], [10]). Based on the control approach, the state-of-the-art control strategies can be largely categorized into three types: model predictive control (MPC) with explicit constraints (e.g., [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]), closed form linear/nonlinear controllers (e.g., [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]), and data-driven approaches (e.g., [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]).

Select All
1.
D. Chen, S. Ahn, M. Chitturi and D. A. Noyce, "Towards vehicle automation: Roadway capacity formulation for traffic mixed with regular and automated vehicles", Transp. Res. B: Methodol., vol. 100, pp. 196-221, Jun. 2017.
2.
Y. Han, D. Chen and S. Ahn, "Variable speed limit control at fixed freeway bottlenecks using connected vehicles", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 98, pp. 113-134, Apr. 2017.
3.
V. Milanés and S. E. Shladover, "Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 48, pp. 285-300, Nov. 2014.
4.
S. E. Shladover, D. Su and X.-Y. Lu, "Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow", Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, vol. 2324, no. 1, pp. 63-70, Jan. 2012.
5.
A. Talebpour, H. S. Mahmassani and F. E. Bustamante, "Modeling driver behavior in a connected environment: Integrated microscopic simulation of traffic and mobile wireless telecommunication systems", Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, vol. 2560, no. 1, pp. 75-86, Jan. 2016.
6.
A. Talebpour and H. S. Mahmassani, "Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 71, pp. 143-163, Oct. 2016.
7.
R. E. Wilson and J. A. Ward, "Car-following models: Fifty years of linear stability analysis—A mathematical perspective", Transp. Planning Technol., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 3-19, 2011.
8.
J. Hu, Y. Shao, Z. Sun, M. Wang, J. Bared and P. Huang, "Integrated optimal eco-driving on rolling terrain for hybrid electric vehicle with vehicle-infrastructure communication", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 68, pp. 228-244, Jul. 2016.
9.
S. E. Li et al., "Dynamical modeling and distributed control of connected and automated vehicles: Challenges and opportunities", IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 46-58, Jul. 2017.
10.
S. E. Li, F. Gao, K. Li, L.-Y. Wang, K. You and D. Cao, "Robust longitudinal control of multi-vehicle systems—A distributed H-infinity method", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2779-2788, Sep. 2018.
11.
S. Gong, J. Shen and L. Du, "Constrained optimization and distributed computation based car following control of a connected and autonomous vehicle platoon", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 94, pp. 314-334, Dec. 2016.
12.
J. Ma, X. Li, F. Zhou, J. Hu and B. B. Park, "Parsimonious shooting heuristic for trajectory design of connected automated traffic. Part II: Computational issues and optimization", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 95, pp. 421-441, Jan. 2017.
13.
M. Wang, W. Daamen, S. P. Hoogendoorn and B. van Arem, "Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems. Part I: Mathematical formulation and non-cooperative systems", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 40, pp. 271-289, Mar. 2014.
14.
Y. Zhou, S. Ahn, M. Chitturi and D. A. Noyce, "Rolling horizon stochastic optimal control strategy for ACC and CACC under uncertainty", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 83, pp. 61-76, Oct. 2017.
15.
J. Shen, E. K. H. Kammara and L. Du, "Fully distributed optimization-based CAV platooning control under linear vehicle dynamics", Transp. Sci., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 381-403, Mar. 2022.
16.
A. M. I. Mahbub and A. A. Malikopoulos, "Conditions to provable system-wide optimal coordination of connected and automated vehicles", Automatica, vol. 131, Sep. 2021.
17.
F. Morbidi, P. Colaneri and T. Stanger, "Decentralized optimal control of a car platoon with guaranteed string stability", Proc. Eur. Control Conf. (ECC), pp. 3494-3499, Jul. 2013.
18.
Y. Zhou and S. Ahn, "Robust local and string stability for a decentralized car following control strategy for connected automated vehicles", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 125, pp. 175-196, Jul. 2019.
19.
H. Zhou, A. Zhou, T. Li, D. Chen, S. Peeta and J. Laval, "Significance of low-level control to string stability under adaptive cruise control: Algorithms theory and experiments", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 140, Jul. 2022.
20.
T. G. Molnár, W. B. Qin, T. Insperger and G. Orosz, "Application of predictor feedback to compensate time delays in connected cruise control", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 545-559, Feb. 2018.
21.
W. B. Qin and G. Orosz, "Scalable stability analysis on large connected vehicle systems subject to stochastic communication delays", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 83, pp. 39-60, Oct. 2017.
22.
W. Gao and Z.-P. Jiang, "Nonlinear and adaptive suboptimal control of connected vehicles: A global adaptive dynamic programming approach", J. Intell. Robot. Syst., vol. 85, pp. 3-4, Mar. 2017.
23.
H. Shi, Y. Zhou, K. Wu, X. Wang, Y. Lin and B. Ran, "Partially connected automated vehicle cooperative control strategy with a deep reinforcement learning approach", arXiv:2012.01841, 2020.
24.
Z. Mo, X. Di and R. Shi, "A physics-informed deep learning paradigm for car-following models", arXiv:2012.13376, 2020.
25.
L. Jiang, Y. Xie, N. G. Evans, X. Wen, T. Li and D. Chen, "Reinforcement learning based cooperative longitudinal control for reducing traffic oscillations and improving platoon stability", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 141, Aug. 2022.
26.
X. Di and R. Shi, "A survey on autonomous vehicle control in the era of mixed-autonomy: From physics-based to AI-guided driving policy learning", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 125, Apr. 2021.
27.
M. Wang, W. Daamen, S. P. Hoogendoorn and B. van Arem, "Cooperative car-following control: Distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1459-1471, May 2016.
28.
Y. Zhou, M. Wang and S. Ahn, "Distributed model predictive control approach for cooperative car-following with guaranteed local and string stability", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 128, pp. 69-86, Oct. 2019.
29.
J. Ploeg, E. Semsar-Kazerooni, G. Lijster, N. van de Wouw and H. Nijmeijer, "Graceful degradation of CACC performance subject to unreliable wireless communication", Proc. 16th Int. IEEE Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst. (ITSC), pp. 1210-1216, Oct. 2013.
30.
M. Bando, K. Hasebe, K. Nakanishi and A. Nakayama, "Analysis of optimal velocity model with explicit delay", Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Top., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 5429-5435, Nov. 1998.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.