1. Introduction
Infertility is a critical problem around the world. This afflicts one in six couples, at least half of whom are casued by men [19], [16]. Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), such as in-vitro-fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), are used depending on the cause and severity of infertility. However, ARTs are currently successful in only approximately 33% of cases, and this main reason is suboptimal sperm selection [27]. In the sperm selection process, at least three fertility factors are typically examined; sperm concentration, motility and morphology [20]. In sperm selection, motility and sperm concentration are assessed using computer-aided semen analysis (CASA) systems, which are sensitive to sample preparation and equipment setup [37], [2]. Morphology is assessed manually by experts, which are inconsistent among individuals and clinics owing to subjective criteria, in addition to being time-consuming and labor-intensive [13], [8], [25], [22]. Therefore, an End2End sperm assessment framework, considering all three factors, is in high demand and promising for improving reproductive success.