Proprioception and Tail Control Enable Extreme Terrain Traversal by Quadruped Robots | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Proprioception and Tail Control Enable Extreme Terrain Traversal by Quadruped Robots


Abstract:

Legged robots leverage ground contacts and the reaction forces they provide to achieve agile locomotion. However, uncertainty coupled with contact discontinuities can lea...Show More

Abstract:

Legged robots leverage ground contacts and the reaction forces they provide to achieve agile locomotion. However, uncertainty coupled with contact discontinuities can lead to failure, especially in real-world environments with unexpected height variations such as rocky hills or curbs. To enable dynamic traversal of extreme terrain, this work introduces 1) a proprioception-based gait planner for estimating unknown hybrid events due to elevation changes and responding by modifying contact schedules and planned footholds online, and 2) a two-degree-of-freedom tail for improving contact-independent control and a corresponding decoupled control scheme for better versatility and efficiency. Simulation results show that the gait planner significantly improves stability under unforeseen terrain height changes compared to methods that assume fixed contact schedules and footholds. Further, tests have shown that the tail is particularly effective at maintaining stability when encountering a terrain change with an initial angular disturbance. The results show that these approaches work synergistically to stabilize locomotion with elevation changes up to 1.5 times the leg length and tilted initial states.
Date of Conference: 01-05 October 2023
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 13 December 2023
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Detroit, MI, USA

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Quadrupedal robots have great potential because of their ability to traverse challenging environments that wheeled and tracked robots cannot. This makes them ideal for tasks such as environmental monitoring and disaster relief. But performing these tasks requires the ability to safely traverse extremely uneven terrains, such as rocky hills or curbs (the left panel of Fig. 1). While legged locomotion controllers can be robust, most of them rely on predefined nominal contact schedules or heuristic-based nominal footholds [3]–[5]. These methods are good at walking in relatively flat laboratory environments, but cannot easily handle extreme terrains, where elevation changes are large enough to invalidate nominal contact schedules and footholds. In contrast, animals can easily traverse these environments using various strategies, including placing feet in repeated locations to ensure reliable contact [6], using tails to reject disturbances [7], [8], and distributed limb control to promote rapid and reactive behaviors [9]. These biological phenomena inspire us to propose new approaches for the perception and control of quadruped robots to improve robustness across extreme terrains.

Left: A quadruped robot successfully traverses an unforeseen cliff using animal-inspired proprioception and tail. Right: Schematic diagram of the control modeling of the tailed robot.

Select All
1.
Y. Yang, J. Norby, J. K. Yim and A. M. Johnson, "Proprioception and tail control enable extreme terrain traversal by quadruped robots", ICRA Workshop on Legged Robots, May 2022.
2.
Y. Yang, J. Norby, J. K. Yim and A. M. Johnson, "Improving tail compatibility through sequential distributed model predictive control", RSS Workshop on Software Tools for Real-Time Optimal Control, July 2021.
3.
M. Raibert, Legged Robots that Balance, MIT Press, 1986.
4.
J. Pratt, J. Carff, S. Drakunov and A. Goswami, "Capture point: A step toward humanoid push recovery", IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 200-207, 2006.
5.
J. Di Carlo, P. M. Wensing, B. Katz et al., "Dynamic locomotion in the MIT Cheetah 3 through convex model-predictive control", IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1-9, 2018.
6.
W. Christensen, "The physical cat" in Outwitting Cats: Tips Tricks and Techniques for Persuading the Felines in Your Life That What You Want Is Also What They Want, Globe Pequot, pp. 22-45, 2004.
7.
T. Libby, T. Y. Moore, E. Chang-Siu et al., "Tail-assisted pitch control in lizards robots and dinosaurs", Nature, vol. 481, no. 7380, pp. 181-184, 2012.
8.
S. Shield, R. Jericevich, A. Patel and A. Jusufi, "Tails flails and sails: How appendages improve terrestrial maneuverability by improving stability", Integrative and Comparative Biology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 506-520, 05 2021.
9.
A. J. Ijspeert, "Central pattern generators for locomotion control in animals and robots: A review", Neural Networks, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 642-653, 2008.
10.
F. Jenelten, T. Miki, A. E. Vijayan et al., "Perceptive locomotion in rough terrain - online foothold optimization", IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 5370-5376, 2020.
11.
N. Kong, C. Li and A. M. Johnson, "Hybrid iLQR model predictive control for contact implicit stabilization on legged robots", arXiv, 2022.
12.
T. Miki, J. Lee, J. Hwangbo et al., "Learning robust perceptive locomotion for quadrupedal robots in the wild", Science Robotics, vol. 7, no. 62, 2022.
13.
M. Hutter, C. Gehring, D. Jud et al., "ANYmal - a highly mobile and dynamic quadrupedal robot", IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 38-44, 2016.
14.
M. Lysakowski, M. R. Nowicki, R. Buchanan et al., "Unsupervised learning of terrain representations for haptic monte carlo localization", 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4642-4648, 2022.
15.
A. M. Johnson, G. C. Haynes and D. E. Koditschek, "Disturbance detection identification and recovery by gait transition in legged robots", IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5347-5353, 2010.
16.
P. M. Wensing, A. Wang, S. Seok et al., "Proprioceptive actuator design in the MIT Cheetah: Impact mitigation and high-bandwidth physical interaction for dynamic legged robots", IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 509-522, 2017.
17.
G. Kenneally, W.-H. Chen and D. E. Koditschek, "Actuator transparency and the energetic cost of proprioception", International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, pp. 485-495, 2018.
18.
P. Fankhauser, M. Bloesch and M. Hutter, "Probabilistic terrain mapping for mobile robots with uncertain localization", IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3019-3026, 2018.
19.
G. Bledt, P. M. Wensing, S. Ingersoll and S. Kim, "Contact model fusion for event-based locomotion in unstructured terrains", IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 4399-4406, 2018.
20.
J. Lee, J. Hwangbo, L. Wellhausen et al., "Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain", Science Robotics, vol. 5, no. 47, pp. eabc5986, Oct. 2020.
21.
T. Homberger, L. Wellhausen, P. Fankhauser and M. Hutter, "Support surface estimation for legged robots", IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 8470-8476, 2019.
22.
A. Seyfarth, H. Geyer and H. Herr, "Swing-leg retraction: a simple control model for stable running", Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 206, no. 15, pp. 2547-2555, 08 2003.
23.
J. Zhu, N. J. Kong, G. Council and A. M. Johnson, "Hybrid event shaping to stabilize periodic hybrid orbits", IEEE Intl. Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 2022.
24.
V. Kurtz, H. Li, P. M. Wensing and H. Lin, "Mini Cheetah the Falling Cat: A Case Study in Machine Learning and Trajectory Optimization for Robot Acrobatics", 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4635-4641, May 2022.
25.
T. Libby, A. M. Johnson, E. Chang-Siu et al., "Comparative design scaling and control of appendages for inertial reorientation", IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1380-1398, 2016.
26.
C.-Y. Lee, S. Yang, B. Bokser and Z. Manchester, "Reaction wheel assisted locomotion for legged robots", ICRA Workshop on Legged Robots, May 2022.
27.
R. Briggs, J. Lee, M. Haberland and S. Kim, "Tails in biomimetic design: Analysis simulation and experiment", IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1473-1480, 2012.
28.
R. T. Fawcett, A. Pandala, J. Kim and K. Akbari Hamed, "Real-time planning and nonlinear control for quadrupedal locomotion with articulated tails", Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, vol. 143, no. 7, 02 2021.
29.
J. Norby, J. Y. Li, C. Selby et al., "Enabling dynamic behaviors with aerodynamic drag in lightweight tails", IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1144-1153, 2021.
30.
A. Patel and E. Boje, "On the conical motion of a two-degree-of-freedom tail inspired by the cheetah", IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1555-1560, 2015.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.