Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Preliminary investigation of a multiple-image radiography method | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Preliminary investigation of a multiple-image radiography method


Abstract:

Conventional radiography seeks to produce, at each location in the image plane, a measure of the X-ray absorption of the object. In this paper, we present a method of det...Show More

Abstract:

Conventional radiography seeks to produce, at each location in the image plane, a measure of the X-ray absorption of the object. In this paper, we present a method of determining a much more complete object description at each point, namely the intensity distribution (as a function of angle) of the emerging X-ray beam. From this distribution one can compute many different images, depicting the refraction, absorption, and scattering characteristics of the object. The method is based on acquisition of multiple X-ray images using monochromator and analyzer crystals, followed by a deconvolution operation (over angle) at each pixel. Parameters of the deconvolved angular intensity function are measured to obtain the various images of interest. We present experimental results obtained using X-rays produced by a synchrotron, along with simulated images showing the effect of noise in a hypothetical photon-limited imaging situation.
Date of Conference: 07-10 July 2002
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 07 November 2002
Print ISBN:0-7803-7584-X
Conference Location: Washington, DC, USA
References is not available for this document.

1. Introduction

Conventional radiographic imaging depicts only one physical parameter of the object: x-ray absorption. Other possibly informative effects such as refraction are not normally measured. An additional limitation of conventional radiography is the presence of scatter, which can obscure important image details.

Select All
1.
R. Fitzgerald, "Phase-Sensitive X-ray Imaging", Physics Today, vol. 53, no. 7, 2000.
2.
K.M. Podurets, V.A. Somenkov and S.S. Shilstein, "Refraction-contrast radiography", Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys., vol. 34, pp. 654-657, 1989.
3.
V.A. Somenkov, A.K. Tkalich and S.S. Shirstein, "Refraction contrast in x-ray introscopy", Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys., vol. 36, pp. 1309-1311, 1991.
4.
V.N. Ingal and E.A. Beliaevsky, "X-ray plane wave topography observation of phase contrast from a non-crystalline object", J Phys, vol. 28, pp. 2314-2317, 1995.
5.
T.E. Gureyev and S.W. Wilkins, "Regimes of x-ray phase-contrast imaging with perfect crystals", Nuovo Cimento, vol. 19, pp. 545-552, 1997.
6.
D. Chapman, W. Thomlinson, R.E. Johnston, D. Washburn, E. Pisano, N. Gmür, et al., "Diffraction Enhanced X-ray Imaging", Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 42, pp. 2015-2025, 1997.
7.
D. Chapman, W. Thomlinson, Z. Zhong, R.E. Johnston, E. Pisano, D. Washburn, et al., "Diffraction enhanced imaging applied to materials science and medicine", Synchrotron Radiation News, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 4-11, 1998.
8.
Z. Zhong, W. Thomlinson, D. Chapman and D. Sayers, "Implementation of diffraction enhanced imaging experiments at the NSLS and APS", Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, vol. 450, pp. 556-567, 2000.
9.
A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird and D.B. Rubin, "Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm", J. Roy. Statist. Sect., vol. 39, pp. 1-38, 1977.
10.
K. Lange and R. E. Carson, "EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography", J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., vol. 9, pp. 306-316, 1984.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.