Loading [a11y]/accessibility-menu.js
Towards 5G-Enabled Operational Technology for Process Monitoring and Network Slicing | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Towards 5G-Enabled Operational Technology for Process Monitoring and Network Slicing


Abstract:

Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) are deployed to monitor physical processes in critical cyber-enabled services like power generation. However, CPS ecosystems are typically de...Show More

Abstract:

Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) are deployed to monitor physical processes in critical cyber-enabled services like power generation. However, CPS ecosystems are typically designed without robust security. While it is important to ensure optimal performance of the Operational Technology (OT) environments, security cannot be overlooked. To modernize traditional OT services, 5G technology is being integrated. 5G technology offers low latency and high availability, making it a suitable infrastructure for managing and monitoring physical processes. How-ever, integrating 5G mechanisms into large-scale OT networks introduces new implementation and performance challenges. Therefore, this paper presents a 5G-enabled CPS architecture (5G-CPS) that describes the necessary components, services, and communication protocols and conducts feasibility study to integrate 5G technology in industrial control system networks to understand the performance merits. The 5G-CPS architecture aims to minimize implementation and operational challenges associated with integrating 5G technology into constrained OT.
Date of Conference: 27-30 November 2023
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 18 October 2023
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: National Harbor, MD, USA
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) are responsible for supporting critical cyber-enabled services such as power generation. However, traditional CPS ecosystems are made up of legacy Operational Technology (OT) devices that lack robust security to ensure the authenticity and integrity of physical processes. Adversaries can exploit the lack of security to disrupt OT de-vices through data breaches and rogue runtime-system-states. Given the recent growth of cyber attacks, the modernization of CPS architectures is necessary to adopt more flexible and resilient communication technology. Next-generation network management and system process monitoring services are suit-able to provide dynamic frameworks that can be adapted to heterogeneous OT devices and industrial communication protocols however next-generation communication technology needs to comply with the operational requirements and real-time data needed of for traditional CPS ecosystems.

Select All
1.
M. Alsaeedi, M. M. Mohamad and A. A. Al-Roubaiey, "Toward adaptive and scalable openflow-sdn flow control: A survey", IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 107346-107379, 2019.
2.
M. H. Rehmani, A. Davy, B. Jennings and C. Assi, "Software defined networks-based smart grid communication: A comprehensive survey", IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2637-2670, 2019.
3.
C. S. Choudhari, R. Patil and S. Saraf, "Deployment of 5g core for 5g private networks", 2022 International Conference on Industry 4. 0 Technology (I4Tech), pp. 1-6, 2022.
4.
L. Chettri and R. Bera, "A comprehensive survey on internet of things (iot) toward 5g wireless systems", IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 16-32, 2020.
5.
W. Ruoxi, H. Beshley, Y. Lingyu, O. Urikova, M. Beshley and O. Kuzmin, "Industrial 5g private network: Architectures resource management challenges and future directions", 2022 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Trends in Radioelectronics Telecommunications and Computer Engineering (TCSET), pp. 780-784, 2022.
6.
E. O'Connell, D. Moore and T. Newe, "Challenges associated with implementing 5g in manufacturing" in Telecom, MDPI, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5, 2020.
7.
L. M. Bartolín-Arnau, J. Vera-Pérez, V. M. Sempere-Payá and J. Silvestre-Blanes, "Private 5g networks for cyber-physical control applications in vertical domains", 2023 IEEE 19th International Conference on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS), pp. 1-4, 2023.
8.
M. Groshev, C. Guimarães, J. Martín-Pérez and A. de la Oliva, "Toward intelligent cyber-physical systems: Digital twin meets artificial intelligence", IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 14-20, 2021.
9.
W. O'Brien, M. Hayes, M. Penica, J. McCann, D. Moore and E. O'Connell, "Enabling communications for industry 4. 0: Private 5g in smart manufacturing", 2023 34th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC), pp. 1-7, 2023.
10.
C. Contoli, D. Rossi, G. Tontini, D. Borsatti and F. Callegati, "Demon-stration of digital twins for 5g connectivity in industry 4. 0", 2021 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virualization and Software Defined Networks (NFV-SDN), pp. 102-103, 2021.
11.
K. Deep Singh and S. K. Sood, "5g ready optical fog-assisted cyber-physical system for iot applications", IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory & Applications, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 137-144, 2020.
12.
C. Tranoris, S. Denazis, L. Guardalben, J. Pereira and S. Sargento, "Enabling cyber-physical systems for 5g networking: A case study on the automotive vertical domain", 2018 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems (SEsCPS), pp. 37-40, 2018.
13.
J. H. Park, S. Rathore, S. K. Singh, M. M. Salim, A. Azzaoui, T. W. Kim, et al., "A comprehensive survey on core technologies and services for 5g security: taxonomies issues and solutions", Hum.-Centric Comput. Inf. Sci, vol. 11, no. 3, 2021.
14.
M. W. Hoffmann, S. Malakuti, S. Grüner, S. Finster, J. Gebhardt, R. Tan, et al., "Developing industrial cps: A multi-disciplinary challenge", Sensors, vol. 21, no. 6, 2021.
15.
C. Parian, T. Guldimann and S. Bhatia, "Fooling the master: Exploiting weaknesses in the modbus protocol", Procedia Computer Science, vol. 171, pp. 2453-2458, 2020.
16.
D. Pliatsios, P. Sarigiannidis, T. Lagkas and A. G. Sarigiannidis, "A survey on scada systems: secure protocols incidents threats and tactics", IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1942-1976, 2020.
17.
A. O. Gomez Rivera and D. K. Tosh, "Towards security and privacy of scada systems through decentralized architecture", 2019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), pp. 1224-1229, 2019.
18.
I. Mistry, S. Tanwar, S. Tyagi and N. Kumar, "Blockchain for 5g-enabled iot for industrial automation: A systematic review solutions and challenges", Mechanical systems and signal processing, vol. 135, pp. 106382, 2020.
19.
W. Sun, X. Chen, Y. Zhao and X. Huang, "Cybersecurity challenges and mitigation strategies for 5g enabled industrial internet of things", IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 114 149-114 160, 2020.
20.
S.-H. Han, J.-W. Lim, J.-H. Lee and S. Lee, "A security analysis of 5g networks for industrial internet of things", IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 33421-33429, 2019.
21.
A. Sargolzaei, K. Yazdani, A. Abbaspour, C. D. Crane and W. E. Dixon, "Detection and mitigation of false data injection attacks in net-worked control symtems", IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 4281-4292, 2020.
22.
L. Mamushiane, A. A. Lysko, T. Mukute, J. Mwangama and Z. D. Toit, "Overview of 9 open-source resource orchestrating etsi mano compliant implementations: A brief survey", 2019 IEEE 2nd Wireless Africa Conference (WAC), pp. 1-7, 2019.
23.
Kubernetes documentation — kubernetes, [online] Available: https://kubernetes.io/docs/home/.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.