Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
A Physics-Inspired Machine Learning Nonlinear Model of Li-ion Batteries | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

A Physics-Inspired Machine Learning Nonlinear Model of Li-ion Batteries


Abstract:

Accurate modeling of Lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) allows for more efficient utilization of their potential without compromising their safety or useful life. Accurate phys...Show More

Abstract:

Accurate modeling of Lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) allows for more efficient utilization of their potential without compromising their safety or useful life. Accurate physics-based models require in-situ measurements and proprietary information unavailable for each cell. Data-driven models offer a solution to identify governing equations of individual cells using only the excitation inputs and measured outputs. How-ever, the main drawback of such models is their performance in unseen scenarios, as they tend to overfit the training data and perform poorly in other scenarios. We seek physics-informed reduced-order nonlinear models of LiBs from measured data. The model was trained using a high-fidelity model of a Li- ion cell. We used Sequentially Thresholded Ridge regression (STRidge) optimization to determine the optimal reduced-order model. Using a validation set, we proposed an algorithm to tune hyperparameters (threshold and regularization parameters). A stochastic electrical current signal up to 2C/4C-rates charge/discharge was used in the training set, and the US highway profile (US06 drive cycle) was used for the validation. The model was validated with EPA Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS) as the test set. The test errors (normalized root mean square error (NRMSE)) were 6.3e-3 for SOC and Voltage predictions.
Date of Conference: 31 May 2023 - 02 June 2023
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 03 July 2023
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: San Diego, CA, USA

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this research, we propose a data-driven algorithm to predict the voltage and state of charge (SOC) of Lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) simultaneously from the electrical current. This algorithm is auto-tuned to have a better performance for validation and test data. Our algorithm offers a solution for a more advanced battery management system (BMS).

Select All
1.
G. Zubi, R. Dufo-López, M. Carvalho and G. Pasaoglu, "The lithiumion battery: State of the art and future perspectives", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 89, pp. 292-308, 2018.
2.
G. Karimi and X. Li, "Thermal management of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles", Int. J. Energy Res, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 13-24, 2013.
3.
D. Zhang, S. Dey, L. D. Couto and S. J. Moura, "Battery adaptive observer for a single-particle model with intercalation-induced stress", IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1363-1377, 2019.
4.
X. Han, M. Ouyang, L. Lu and J. Li, "Simplification of physicsbased electrochemical model for lithium ion battery on electric vehicle. Part I: Diffusion simplification and single particle model", J. Power Sources, vol. 278, pp. 802-813, 2015.
5.
S. J. Moura, F. B. Argomedo, R. Klein, A. Mirtabatabaei and M. Krstic, "Battery state estimation for a single particle model with electrolyte dynamics", IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 453-468, 2017.
6.
S. Park, D. Zhang, R. Klein and S. Moura, "Estimation of cyclable lithium for li-ion battery state-of-health monitoring" in ACC 21, IEEE, pp. 3094-3101, 2021.
7.
S. Park, D. Kato, Z. Gima, R. Klein and S. Moura, "Optimal experimental design for parameterization of an electrochemical lithium-ion battery model", J. Electrochem. Soc, vol. 165, no. 7, pp. A1309, 2018.
8.
M. Ecker, T. K. D. Tran, P. Dechent, S. Käbitz, A. Warnecke and D. U. Sauer, "Parameterization of a Physico-Chemical Model of a Lithium-Ion Battery: I. Determination of Parameters", J. Electrochem. Soc, vol. 162, no. 9, pp. A1836-A1848, 2015.
9.
P. Kemper and D. Kum, "Extended single particle model of li-ion batteries towards high current applications", IEEE Veh. Power Propuls. Conf. VPPC 2013, pp. 1-6, 2013.
10.
T. R. Tanim, C. D. Rahn and C.-Y. Wang, "A temperature dependent single particle lithium ion cell model including electrolyte diffusion", J Dyn Syst Meas, vol. 137, no. 1, 2015.
11.
K. E. Thomas, J. Newman and R. M. Darling, "Mathematical modeling of lithium batteries" in Advances in Lithium-Ion Batteries, Springer, pp. 345-392, 2002.
12.
M. Doyle, "Modeling of Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge of the Lithium/Polymer/Insertion Cell", Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 1526, 1993.
13.
N. A. Chaturvedi, R. Klein, J. Christensen, J. Ahmed and A. Kojic, "Algorithms for advanced battery-management systems", IEEE Control Syst, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 49-68, 2010.
14.
H. He, R. Xiong and J. Fan, "Evaluation of lithium-ion battery equivalent circuit models for state of charge estimation by an experimental approach", energies, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 582-598, 2011.
15.
M. Nikdel et al., "Various battery models for various simulation studies and applications", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 32, pp. 477-485, 2014.
16.
Z. Geng, S. Wang, M. J. Lacey, D. Brandell and T. Thiringer, "Bridging physics-based and equivalent circuit models for lithium-ion batteries", Electrochimica Acta, vol. 372, pp. 137829, 2021.
17.
M. Derakhshan and D. Soudbakhsh, "Temperature-dependent time constants of li-ion batteries", IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 6, pp. 2012-2017, 2021.
18.
M. Derakhshan, E. Sahraei and D. Soudbakhsh, "Detecting mechanical indentation from the time constants of li-ion batteries", Cell Reports Physical Science, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 101102, 2022.
19.
X. Hu, S. E. Li and Y. Yang, "Advanced Machine Learning Approach for Lithium-Ion Battery State Estimation in Electric Vehicles", IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, vol. 2, pp. 140-149, June 2016.
20.
R. P. Joshi, J. Eickholt, L. Li, M. Fornari, V. Barone and J. E. Peralta, "Machine learning the voltage of electrode materials in metal-ion batteries", ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 11, no. 20, pp. 18494-18503, 2019.
21.
E. Chemali, P. J. Kollmeyer, M. Preindl and A. Emadi, "State-of-charge estimation of Li-ion batteries using deep neural networks: A machine learning approach", J. Power Sources, vol. 400, pp. 242-255, 2018.
22.
S. Li, H. He, C. Su and P. Zhao, "Data driven battery modeling and management method with aging phenomenon considered", Appl. Energy, vol. 275, pp. 115340, 2020.
23.
W. Junping, C. Quanshi and C. Binggang, "Support vector machine based battery model for electric vehicles", Energy conversion and management, vol. 47, no. 7-8, pp. 858-864, 2006.
24.
H. Tu, S. Moura and H. Fang, "Integrating electrochemical modeling with machine learning for lithium-ion batteries", 2021 American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 4401-4407, 2021.
25.
T. F. Chan, "An improved algorithm for computing the singular value decomposition", ACM Trans. Math. Software, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 72-83, 1982.
26.
S. L. Brunton, J. L. Proctor and J. N. Kutz, "Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems", PNAS, vol. 113, no. 15, pp. 3932-3937, 2016.
27.
J. Annoni and P. Seiler, "A method to construct reduced-order parameter-varying models", INT J ROBUST NONLIN, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 582-597, 2017.
28.
K. K. Chen, J. H. Tu and C. W. Rowley, "Variants of dynamic mode decomposition: Boundary condition Koopman and Fourier analyses", J. Nonlinear Sci, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 887-915, 2012.
29.
P. J. Schmid, "Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data", J. Fluid Mech, vol. 656, pp. 5-28, 2010.
30.
S. L. Brunton, J. L. Proctor and J. N. Kutz, "Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics with control (SINDYc)", IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 49, no. 18, pp. 710-715, 2016.

References

References is not available for this document.