Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Assessing the Robustness of Deep Learning-Assisted Pathological Image Analysis Under Practical Variables of Imaging System | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Assessing the Robustness of Deep Learning-Assisted Pathological Image Analysis Under Practical Variables of Imaging System


Abstract:

With the advancement of deep learning, computer-assisted clinical diagnosis, such as liquid-based cervical cytology, has attracted more attention. However, the fragile ro...Show More

Abstract:

With the advancement of deep learning, computer-assisted clinical diagnosis, such as liquid-based cervical cytology, has attracted more attention. However, the fragile robustness of deep learning models has a non-negligible impact on their classification accuracy and reliability. To be more specific, various scanner parameters will be used depending on the pathologist’s preferences during the clinical diagnosis process (e.g., field source brightness, contrast, saturation, etc.), and this variation will lead to the unstable performance of the model. In this paper, we construct an evaluation pathway to assess the stability and consistency of deep learning models under various customized scanner parameters. Specifically, a multi-scanned dataset consists of 4200 whole slide images (WSIs) is generated by scanning 200 stained slices using various scanner parameters. Moreover, we conducted a large number of experiments to investigate the robustness of numerous models, including convolution-based and transformer-based models concerning various scanner parameter settings. Furthermore, we introduce several indicators to analyze the prediction accuracy, consistency and robustness of the model on the constructed dataset. The experimental results indicate that the deep learning models are sensitive to luminance-related scanner parameters. In addition, transformer-based models have better robustness than traditional convolutional neural networks. Our code has been made available1.
Date of Conference: 04-10 June 2023
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 05 May 2023
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Rhodes Island, Greece

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

1. INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer is still one of the worst health threats to women worldwide, reported in Global Cancer Statistics 2020 [1]. Clinical pathology screening with liquid-based cytology (LBC, thinprep) is a positive recommendation for the early detection of cervical precancerous lesions and effectively prevents the progression of invasive cancer [2]. However, inefficient and labor-intensive conventional analysis under microscopy cannot meet the growing demand for regular screening. In recent years, the advancement of digital pathology technology has led to significant progress in clinical processing through the digitalization of whole slide images. With the evolution of deep neural networks (DNNs) such as convolutional neural networks (CNN) and vision transformers [3], [4], [5], artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnosis can significantly strengthen the working efficiency and diagnostic quality of pathologists.

Select All
1.
Hyuna Sung, Jacques Ferlay, Rebecca L Siegel, Mathieu Laversanne, Isabelle Soerjomataram, Ahmedin Jemal, et al., "Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality world-wide for 36 cancers in 185 countries", CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209-249, 2021.
2.
Debbie Saslow, Diane Solomon, Herschel W Lawson, Maureen Killackey, Shalini L Kulasingam, Joanna Cain, Francisco AR Garcia, Ann Ts Moriarty, Alan G Waxman, David C Wilbur et al., "American cancer society american society for colposcopy and cervical pathology and american society for clinical pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer", American journal of clinical pathology, vol. 137, no. 4, pp. 516-542, 2012.
3.
Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly et al., "An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale", 2020.
4.
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren and Jian Sun, "Deep residual learning for image recognition", Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 770-778, 2016.
5.
Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer and Thomas Brox, "U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation", International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pp. 234-241, 2015.
6.
Hiroshi Yoshida, Hideo Yokota, Rajendra Singh, Tomoharu Kiyuna, Masahiro Yamaguchi, Susumu Kikuchi, et al., "Meeting report: the international workshop on harmonization and standardization of digital pathology image held on april 4 2019 in tokyo", Pathobiology, vol. 86, no. 5-6, pp. 322-324, 2019.
7.
Samuel Dodge and Lina Karam, "Understanding how image quality affects deep neural networks", 2016 eighth international conference on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX), pp. 1-6, 2016.
8.
Dan Hendrycks and Thomas Dietterich, "Benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations", International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
9.
Nicholas Chandler Wang, Jeremy Kaplan, Joonsang Lee, Jeffrey Hodgin, Aaron Udager and Arvind Rao, "Stress testing pathology models with generated artifacts", Journal of Pathology Informatics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 54, 2021.
10.
Yunlong Zhang, Yuxuan Sun, Honglin Li, Sunyi Zheng, Chenglu Zhu and Lin Yang, "Benchmarking the robustness of deep neural networks to common corruptions in digital pathology", 2022.
11.
Maki Ogura, Tomoharu Kiyuna and Hiroshi Yoshida, "Impact of blurs on machine-learning aided digital pathology image analysis", Artificial Intelligence in Cancer, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31-38, 2020.
12.
Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman, "Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition", 2014.
13.
Mingxing Tan and Quoc Le, "Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks", International conference on machine learning, pp. 6105-6114, 2019.
14.
Zhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer, Trevor Darrell and Saining Xie, "A convnet for the 2020s", Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11976-11986, 2022.
15.
Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, et al., "Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows", Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 10012-10022, 2021.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.