Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
A Graph-Based Methodology for the Sensorless Estimation of Road Traffic Profiles | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

A Graph-Based Methodology for the Sensorless Estimation of Road Traffic Profiles


Abstract:

Traffic forecasting models rely on data that needs to be sensed, processed, and stored. This requires the deployment and maintenance of traffic sensing infrastructure, of...Show More

Abstract:

Traffic forecasting models rely on data that needs to be sensed, processed, and stored. This requires the deployment and maintenance of traffic sensing infrastructure, often leading to unaffordable monetary costs. The lack of sensed locations can be complemented with synthetic data simulations that further lower the economical investment needed for traffic monitoring. One of the most common data generative approaches consists of producing real-like traffic patterns, according to data distributions from analogous roads. The process of detecting roads with similar traffic is the key point of these systems. However, without collecting data at the target location no flow metrics can be employed for this similarity-based search. We present a method to discover locations among those with available traffic data by inspecting topological features. These features are extracted from domain-specific knowledge as numerical representations (embeddings) to compare different locations and eventually find roads with analogous daily traffic profiles based on the similarity between embeddings. The performance of this novel selection system is examined and compared to simpler traffic estimation approaches. After finding a similar source of data, a generative method is used to synthesize traffic profiles. Depending on the resemblance of the traffic behavior at the sensed road, the generation method can be fed with data from one road only. Several generation approaches are analyzed in terms of the precision of the synthesized samples. Above all, this work intends to stimulate further research efforts towards enhancing the quality of synthetic traffic samples and thereby, reducing the need for sensing infrastructure.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems ( Volume: 24, Issue: 8, August 2023)
Page(s): 8701 - 8715
Date of Publication: 18 January 2023

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

One of the main goals of traffic management is to provide a safe traffic infrastructure, where most of the potential traffic congestion scenarios and car collisions are avoided. This issue can be addressed by modeling the traffic behavior of the road network and by developing predictive methods that allow forecasting metrics that characterize traffic, such as flow, speed, or travel time [1]. This process enables the implementation of operational measures for decision making (e.g., redirecting traffic flow to other alternative routes). These traffic forecasting models are usually built from past traffic observations. However, in practice traffic data acquisition systems cannot be deployed over every link of a road, mainly due to the high costs of deployment and maintenance of such sensing equipment. On many occasions this issue has been addressed by deploying temporal sensors that provide measurements for certain locations of interest during a limited period of time. Nevertheless, a proper characterization of the traffic behavior under a variety of circumstances (e.g., events or holidays) requires real traffic measurements over more dilated periods [2]. Thus, real traffic data are not available for every road link, nor are they collected for the time needed for a thorough characterization. Indeed, in some cases placing a sensor is not feasible due to manifold reasons. If possible, another concern arises from the long latency needed to collect sufficient data for the subsequent model training. Since the performance of traffic forecasting models is constrained to both data quality and quantity, data availability is arguably the practical bottleneck for a successful traffic network characterization.

Select All
1.
I. Lana, J. D. Ser, M. Velez and E. I. Vlahogianni, "Road traffic forecasting: Recent advances and new challenges", IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 93-109, 2018.
2.
E. L. Manibardo, I. Lana and J. D. Ser, "Transfer learning and online learning for traffic forecasting under different data availability conditions: Alternatives and pitfalls", Proc. IEEE 23rd Int. Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst. (ITSC), pp. 1-6, Sep. 2020.
3.
E. L. Manibardo, I. Lana and J. D. Ser, "Deep learning for road traffic forecasting: Does it make a difference?", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 6164-6188, Jul. 2022.
4.
L. L. Pipino, Y. W. Lee and R. Y. Wang, "Data quality assessment", Commun. ACM, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 211-218, 2002.
5.
Caltrans Performance Measurement System, Nov. 2020, [online] Available: https://pems.dot.ca.gov.
6.
B. Liao et al., "Deep sequence learning with auxiliary information for traffic prediction", Proc. 24th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining, pp. 537-546, Jul. 2018.
7.
H. V. Jagadish et al., "Big data and its technical challenges", Commun. ACM, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 86-94, Jul. 2014.
8.
I. Laña, J. J. Sanchez-Medina, E. I. Vlahogianni and J. D. Ser, "From data to actions in intelligent transportation systems: A prescription of functional requirements for model actionability", Sensors, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1121, Feb. 2021.
9.
I. Lana, I. Oregi and J. D. Ser, "Soft sensing methods for the generation of plausible traffic data in sensor-less locations", Proc. IEEE Int. Intell. Transp. Syst. Conf. (ITSC), pp. 3183-3189, Sep. 2021.
10.
E. I. Vlahogianni, M. G. Karlaftis and J. C. Golias, "Short-term traffic forecasting: Where we are and where we’re going", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 43, pp. 3-19, Jun. 2014.
11.
T. Brinkhoff, "Generating traffic data", IEEE Comput. Soc. Tech. Committee Data Eng., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 19-25, Jun. 2003.
12.
D. Krajzewicz, J. Erdmann, M. Behrisch and L. Bieker, "Recent development and applications of SUMO-simulation of urban mobility", Int. J. Adv. Syst. Meas., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1-11, 2012.
13.
M. Fellendorf and P. Vortisch, "Microscopic traffic flow simulator VISSIM" in Fundamentals Traffic Simulation, Cham, Switzerland:Springer, pp. 63-93, 2010.
14.
L. E. Owen, Y. Zhang, L. Rao and G. McHale, "Traffic flow simulation using CORSIM", Proc. Winter Simulation Conf., pp. 1143-1147, Dec. 2000.
15.
K. W Axhausen, A. Horni and K. Nagel, The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation MATSim, London, U.K.:Ubiquity Press, 2016.
16.
P. A. Lopez et al., "Microscopic traffic simulation using SUMO", Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst. (ITSC), pp. 2575-2582, Nov. 2018.
17.
M. K. Reilly, M. P. O’Mara and K. C. Seto, "From bangalore to the bay area: Comparing transportation and activity accessibility as drivers of urban growth", Landscape Urban Planning, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 24-33, Aug. 2009.
18.
T.-H. Wen, W.-C.-B. Chin and P.-C. Lai, "Understanding the topological characteristics and flow complexity of urban traffic congestion", Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl., vol. 473, pp. 166-177, May 2017.
19.
S. Wang, D. Yu, X. Ma and X. Xing, "Analyzing urban traffic demand distribution and the correlation between traffic flow and the built environment based on detector data and POIs", Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1-17, Jun. 2018.
20.
N. Geroliminis and C. F. Daganzo, "Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 759-770, Nov. 2008.
21.
L. Ambühl, A. Loder, L. Leclercq and M. Menendez, "Disentangling the city traffic rhythms: A longitudinal analysis of MFD patterns over a year", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 126, May 2021.
22.
J. A. Laval and F. Castrillón, "Stochastic approximations for the macroscopic fundamental diagram of urban networks", Transp. Res. Proc., vol. 7, pp. 615-630, Jan. 2015.
23.
W. Wong, S. C. Wong and H. X. Liu, "Network topological effects on the macroscopic fundamental diagram", Transportmetrica B Transp. Dyn., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 376-398, Jan. 2021.
24.
I. I. Sirmatel and N. Geroliminis, "Stabilization of city-scale road traffic networks via macroscopic fundamental diagram-based model predictive perimeter control", Control Eng. Pract., vol. 109, Apr. 2021.
25.
Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio and G. Hinton, "Deep learning", Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436-444, 2015.
26.
S. Landolt, T. Wambsganss and M. Söllner, "A taxonomy for deep learning in natural language processing", Proc. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. (ICSS), pp. 1-10, 2021.
27.
M. Hassaballah and A. I. Awad, Deep Learning in Computer Vision: Principles and Applications, Boca Raton, FL, USA:CRC Press, 2020.
28.
A. Darmochwał, "The Euclidean space", Formalized Math., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 599-603, 1991.
29.
A. Vaswani et al., "Attention is all you need", Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 30, pp. 1-11, 2017.
30.
A. B. Arrieta et al., "Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts taxonomies opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI", Inf. Fusion, vol. 58, pp. 82-115, Jun. 2020.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.