Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Comparison of CART Algorithm and Cropping Calendar in Estimating Paddy Growth Stage in Karawang Regency, West Java | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Comparison of CART Algorithm and Cropping Calendar in Estimating Paddy Growth Stage in Karawang Regency, West Java


Abstract:

Classification And Regression Trees (CART) is one of the classic and simple algorithm in predictive modeling machine learning. This study aims to compare the result of pa...Show More

Abstract:

Classification And Regression Trees (CART) is one of the classic and simple algorithm in predictive modeling machine learning. This study aims to compare the result of paddy growth stage estimates based on CART model of Sentinel-1A Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data and Cropping Calendar (KATAM). The construction of the CART model utilises real data field from Area Frame Sampling (Kerangka Sampling Area or KSA) in Karawang Regency observed on 2020. The CART algorithm makes predictions using a tree structure or hierarchical structure. The CART algorithm focuses on finding a decision tree model that has a Gini impurities value = 0. The rules for classifying class based on the physical polarization spectrum which is represented by pixel digital number from Vertical-Vertical (VV), Vertical-Horizontal (VH), and VV/VH of SAR image properties. This study found that the initial planting time is different. The CART model estimates the initial planting time is on September, while the KATAM estimates on November-December.
Date of Conference: 24-25 November 2022
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 30 December 2022
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Yogyakarta, Indonesia
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Indonesia is an agricultural country with one of the main agricultural commodities is rice. Data from Statistic Indonesia (BPS) stated that rice production in 2020 reached 54.65 million tons of dry milled grain (in Indonesian called Gabah Kering Giling or GKG). Since rice production is strategic activities, therefore some methods have developed to monitor rice and paddy field including paddy growth stage. There are two methods that have been developed for paddy growth stage observation which are satellite-based remote sensing and statistic-based terrestrial observation. Satellite-based remote sensing method has the advantage on area coverage and repeat observations and well known as temporal resolution, whereas statistic-based terrestrial observation method has the advantage on informing actual paddy condition directly from the field [1].

Select All
1.
A. Agustan, S. Yulianto, R. Arifandri, H. Sadmono and Y. Anantasena, "Automatic paddy growth stage identification based on convolutional neural network", Proc.-39th Asian Conf. Remote Sens. Remote Sens. Enabling Prosper. ACRS 2018, vol. 5, pp. 3209-3214, 2018.
2.
A. Agustan, M. Mubekti and L. Sumargana, "The utilization of ALOS-2 data to identify the potential area for paddy field", Proc.-36th Asian Conf. Remote Sens. Remote Sens. Fostering Resilient Growth in Asia ACRS 2015, pp. 118634, 2015.
3.
A. Agustan, S. Yulianto, A. Anisah, L. Sumargana and B. H. Santosa, "High temporal resolution of sentinel-la data for paddy field identification based on change detection method", Proc.-39th Asian Conf. Remote Sens. Remote Sens. Enabling Prosper, vol. 5, pp. 2709-2714, 2018.
4.
A. Agustan, S. Yulianto, R. Arifandri, F. Alhasanah, L. Sumargana and H. Sadmono, "Sentinel-I Dual-Polarization Data Analysis to Identify Paddy Growth Stages in Indramayu District", IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 280, no. 1, pp. 012021, 2019.
5.
M. Mubekti and L. Sumargana, "An Area Sampling Frame Approach for Estimating and Forecasting Rice Production [in Indonesian] Pendekatan kerangka sampel area untuk estimasi dan peramalan produksi padi", Jurnal Pangan, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 71-146, 2016.
6.
F. Ramadhani, E. Runtunuwu and H. Syahbuddin, "Integrated Cropping Calendar Information Technology System [in Indonesian]" in Sistem teknologi informasi kalender tanam terpadu, Jurnal Informatika Pertanian, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 103-112, 2013.
7.
A. Agustan, S. Yulianto, L. Sumargana, H. Sadmono and F. Alhasanah, "Innovation on Geolocation and Pattern Recognition for Paddy Growth Stages Reporting in Indonesia" in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 012001, 2018.
8.
Q. Wu, "geemap: A Python package for interactive mapping with Google Earth Engine", Journal of Open Source Software, vol. 5, no. 51, pp. 2305, 2020.
9.
R. J. Lewis, "An introduction to classification and regression tree (CART) analysis" in Annual meeting of the society for academic emergency medicine in San Francisco, California, Citeseer, vol. 14, May 2000.
10.
H. R. Bittencourt and R. T. Clarke, "Use of classification and regression trees (CART) to classify remotely-sensed digital images", IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37477), vol. 6, pp. 3751-3753, 2003.
11.
A. Bar-Hen, S. Gey and J. M. Poggi, "Spatial CART classification trees", Computational Statistics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 2591-2613, 2021.
12.
S. Yulianto, A. Anisah, A. Agustan, L. Sumargana, Y. Anantasena and B. H. Santosa, "Spatial Distribution of Paddy Growth Stage Using Sentinel-1 based on CART Model", 2021 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Geoscience Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology (AGERS), pp. 73-77, 2021.
13.
S. Santoso, Kappa alignment [in Indonesian] Keselarasan Kappa [Ebook], pp. 6, September 2005.
14.
A. S. Namin and J. H. Andrews, "The influence of size and coverage on test suite effectiveness", Proceedings of the eighteenth international symposium on Software testing and analysis, pp. 57-68, July 2009.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.