Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Minimal Injury Risk Motion Planning Using Active Mitigation and Sampling Model Predictive Control | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Minimal Injury Risk Motion Planning Using Active Mitigation and Sampling Model Predictive Control


Abstract:

Collision mitigation is an important element in motion planning. Although Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS) have a rich number of functionalities, they lack inter...Show More

Abstract:

Collision mitigation is an important element in motion planning. Although Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS) have a rich number of functionalities, they lack interchangeability. There is still a gap on finding a way to evaluate the best decision globally. This paper presents a novel motion planning framework to generate emergency maneuvers in complex and risky scenarios using active mitigation. The classical Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) algorithm is improved to be used in a probabilistic dynamic cost map under limited perception range. A cost map with global probability of injury to all road users is used as a constraint to the problem in order to compute target selection based on the global minimum risk considering all road users. Real experiments introduce the use of augmented sensor data by merging simulation and real sensor data to safely produce collision and mitigation experiments. Results show that the proposed algorithm can perform correctly in real time on board of the vehicle, by finding collision-free trajectories in complex scenarios and compute viable target selection that minimizes global injury risk when collision is inevitable.
Date of Conference: 08-12 October 2022
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 01 November 2022
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Macau, China
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS) have been developed to raise safety and driving comfort. Primary safety has been addressed over the years with the advancement of safety technologies such as Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Advanced Evasive Steering (AES) systems.

Select All
1.
"Euro ncap launches road map 2025 - in pursuit of vision zero", Euro NCAP Tech. Rep., 09 2017.
2.
H. Wang, Y. Huang, A. Khajepour, Y. Zhang, Y. Rasekhipour and D. Cao, "Crash mitigation in motion planning for autonomous vehicles", IEEE Transactions on ITS, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 3313-3323, Sep. 2019.
3.
K. Lee and D. Kum, "Collision avoidance/mitigation system: Motion planning of autonomous vehicle via predictive occupancy map", IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 52846-52857, 2019.
4.
M. Schachner, W. Sinz, R. Thomson and C. Klug, "Development and evaluation of potential accident scenarios involving pedestrians and aeb-equipped vehicles to demonstrate the efficiency of an enhanced open-source simulation framework", Accident Analysis Prevention, vol. 148, pp. 105831, 2020.
5.
J. Kovaceva, A. Balint, R. Schindler and A. Schneider, "Safety benefit assessment of autonomous emergency braking and steering systems for the protection of cyclists and pedestrians based on a combination of computer simulation and real-world test results", Accident Analysis Prevention, vol. 136, pp. 105352, 2020.
6.
G. Williams, P. Drews, B. Goldfain, J. M. Rehg and E. A. Theodorou, "Aggressive driving with model predictive path integral control", IEEE ICRA, pp. 1433-1440, May 2016.
7.
H. Kappen, "Linear theory for control of nonlinear stochastic systems", Physical review letters, vol. 95, pp. 200201, 12 2005.
8.
G. Williams, A. Aldrich and E. A. Theodorou, "Model predictive path integral control: From theory to parallel computation", Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, vol. 40, pp. 344-357, 2017.
9.
A. Buyval, A. Gabdullin and A. Klimchik, "Model predictive path integral control for car driving with dynamic cost map", IEEE/RSJ IROS, pp. 258-264, 01 2018.
10.
I. S. Mohamed, G. Allibert and P. Martinet, "Model predictive path integral control framework for partially observable navigation: A quadrotor case study", International Conference on Control Automation Robotics and Vision, pp. 196-203, 2020.
11.
L. A. S. Guardini, A. Spalanzani, C. Laugier, P. Martinet, A.-L. Do and T. Hermitte, "Employing Severity of Injury to Contextualize Complex Risk Mitigation Scenarios", IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 1-7, 10 2020.
12.
L. Rummelhard, A. Negre and C. Laugier, "Conditional monte carlo dense occupancy tracker", IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 2485-2490, Sep. 2015.
13.
G. Williams, B. Goldfain, P. Drews, K. Saigol, J. Rehg and E. Theodorou, "Robust sampling based model predictive control with sparse objective information", Robotics Science and Systems, 06 2018.
14.
"Road vehicles - functional safety", 2018, [online] Available: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:68383:en.
15.
M. Quigley et al., "Ros: an open-source robot operating system", IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation Workshop on Open Source Robotics, may 2009.
16.
N. Koenig and A. Howard, "Design and use paradigms for gazebo an open-source multirobot simulator", IEEE/RSJ IROS, vol. 3, pp. 2149-2154, Sep. 2004.
17.
T. Genevois, J.-B. Horel, A. Renzaglia and C. Laugier, "Augmented Reality on LiDAR data: Going beyond Vehicle-in-the-Loop for Automotive Software Validation", IEEE IVS Aachen Germany, June 2022.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.