Loading web-font TeX/Main/Regular
Kerr Frequency Comb and Stimulated Raman Comb Covering S+C+L+U Band Based on a Packaged Silica Spherical Microcavity | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Kerr Frequency Comb and Stimulated Raman Comb Covering S+C+L+U Band Based on a Packaged Silica Spherical Microcavity


Abstract:

Optical microresonators supported whispering gallery modes (WGMs) are one of the most cost-effective platforms for optical frequency comb generated due to their advantage...Show More

Abstract:

Optical microresonators supported whispering gallery modes (WGMs) are one of the most cost-effective platforms for optical frequency comb generated due to their advantages of ultra-high quality (Q) factor and ultra-low mode volume. In this paper, we report a portable and robust packaged silica spherical microcavity by melting the end of a standard single-mode fiber with ultra-high Q factor up to {10}^8, and theoretically and experimentally demonstrate a broadband optical frequency comb (OFC) generation including Kerr OFC and stimulated Raman comb. Kerr OFCs are separated by one, two, eight and twelve free spectral ranges corresponding to 1.4, 2.8, 11.2, and 16.8 nm, respectively. The transition between Kerr OFC and stimulated Raman comb is achieved by changing the pump laser power and the detuning frequency resulting from gain competition between modulation instability and Raman gain. Benefitting from the dispersion control and ultra-high Q factor persistence in our packaged microcavity, OFC can be adjusted continuously covering from S-band to C-band, L-band and U-band. We also explain these results by numerical simulations using a model framework combined with the Lugiato-Lefever equation and Raman response function.
Published in: Journal of Lightwave Technology ( Volume: 41, Issue: 1, 01 January 2023)
Page(s): 199 - 208
Date of Publication: 29 September 2022

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

No metrics found for this document.

I. Introduction

Optical frequency comb (OFC) sources have been proven be useful in numerous applications including molecular spectroscopy [1], RF photonics [2], millimeter wave generation [3], frequency metrology [4], atomic clock [5] and dense/ultra-dense wavelength division multiplexed high speed optical communications [6]. These applications require highly stable, coherent and cost OFC sources. Typical OFC sources generate multiple carriers offering low power consumption and complexity by replacing multiple independent lasers with a single subsystem [7]. OFCs in whispering gallery modes (WGMs) microcavities [7], or ‘microcombs’, are coherent light sources generated by a continuous-wave laser pump and have attracted extensive attention [9]–[10]. The WGM microcavity-based OFC is first realized in the silica microtoroid cavity [11]. Up to now, Kerr frequency combs are successfully generated in spherical, ring, toroid, disk, and bottle microcavities made of different materials with third-order optical nonlinearity or second-order nonlinearity [12], [13] [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Compared with traditional OFCs built on mode-locked lasers, microcomb is considered a new type of coherent light source that shows unique and promising advantages of lower power consumption as well as whole system integratability. Further, microcombs are also capable of generating ultrashort pulses with gigahertz to terahertz repetition rates [23]. As shown in Table I, typical microcombs are briefed. OFC generation with different spectral coverages have been demonstrated various material platforms, including the micro-cavity types, materials, Q factor values, wavelength ranges, etc. Among them, the silica spherical microcavity is one of the simplest ones because it is easy to be engineered to sphere shapes by melting the end of a standard single-mode fiber using CO2 laser [21]. The microsphere cavity has become an ideal candidate for OFC generation at low threshold powers [17], [18], [19], [20]. Typical Parameters of Microcavities Made of Different Materials

Material Structure Q factor FSR (GHz) Wavelength range (nm) Refs
Si3N4 microring 0.6×106 1000 850 to 2000 [12]
microring 1.5×106 ∼230 1500 to 1650 [13]
LiNbO3 microring 1.1×106 ∼200 1830 to 2130 [14]
SiO2 microbubble 5×107 ∼464 1530 to 1560 [15]
microbottle 1×107 ∼400 1520 to 1600 [16]
microsphere 3.7×107 ∼260 1500 to 1600 [17]
5×107 ∼408 1400 to 1700 [21]
2×107 ∼357 1300 to 1700 [22]

Usage
Select a Year
2025

View as

Total usage sinceSep 2022:559
02468101214JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec7413000000000
Year Total:24
Data is updated monthly. Usage includes PDF downloads and HTML views.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.