Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic
A Novel Framework for Road Side Unit Location Optimization for Origin-Destination Demand Estimation | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

A Novel Framework for Road Side Unit Location Optimization for Origin-Destination Demand Estimation


Abstract:

This study deals with the problem of road side unit (RSU) location optimization for origin-destination (OD) demand estimation. With the point-to-point measurement provide...Show More

Abstract:

This study deals with the problem of road side unit (RSU) location optimization for origin-destination (OD) demand estimation. With the point-to-point measurement provided by RSUs in connected vehicle environment, the errors of OD demand estimation come from two sources: 1) the lack of enough path flow information; and 2) the vehicle-to-RSU (V2R) communication delay. However, increasing the amount of path flow information collected by RSUs results in the increase of V2R communication delay encountered by each collected data packet. Moreover, it is difficult to find a global optimal solution by formulating the problem as a single objective program. To address the investigated problem, this study proposes a novel framework consisting of solving a bi-objective RSU location optimization problem and an OD demand estimation problem. This RSU location optimization problem is formulated as a bi-objective nonlinear binary integer program to balance the maximization of the amount of path flow information and the minimization of V2R communication delay. The OD demand estimation problem is formulated as a least square estimator to identify the RSU location scheme with the smallest OD demand estimation error, among the Pareto optimal solutions to the bi-objective program. An efficient \varepsilon -constraint method is developed to generate the Pareto optimal solutions. The numerical example demonstrates that the proposed framework achieves 6.95 lower root-mean-square error of OD demand estimation, compared with the baseline framework.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems ( Volume: 23, Issue: 11, November 2022)
Page(s): 21113 - 21126
Date of Publication: 31 August 2022

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Sensor location optimization for Origin-destination (OD) demand estimation is crucial for cost-effective OD demand estimation. Traditional ways to obtain OD demand of a transportation network, such as roadside interviews and postcard surveys, are costly, time consuming, and labor intensive. Sensors, such as loop detectors and Automatic Vehicle Identifications (AVIs), located in a transportation network is able to collect link flow information or path flow information. This provides a cost-effective way to obtain OD demand and motivates the development of some effective OD demand estimation method, such as entropy maximization method [1], generalized least squares method [2] and deep learning method [3]. Sensor location significantly affects the accuracy of OD demand estimation from two ways: 1) sensor location affects the quality of the solution to an OD demand estimation model, given that the input data is correctly observed; 2) different sensor location decisions usually associate with different errors of the input data. To reduce the errors caused by the first factor, Yang et al. proposed the concept of “Maximum Possible Relative Error” to evaluate the quality of the solution to an OD demand estimation model [4]. Built on this concept, rules and corresponding models for OD-demand-estimation-oriented sensor location optimization are proposed in the literatures [5], [6], [7]. To reduce the errors induced by the second factor, OD-demand-estimation-oriented sensor location models are developed to minimize the input data errors, such as the error of priori route flow information [8], [9], the error of prior OD demand [10], and the measurement error of collected data [11].

Select All
1.
H. J. Van Zuylen and L. G. Willumsen, "The most likely trip matrix estimated from traffic counts", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 281-293, 1980.
2.
W. Ma and Z. Qian, "Statistical inference of probabilistic origin-destination demand using day-to-day traffic data", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 88, pp. 227-256, Mar. 2018.
3.
Y. Cao, K. Tang, J. Sun and Y. Ji, "Day-to-day dynamic origin–destination flow estimation using connected vehicle trajectories and automatic vehicle identification data", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 129, Aug. 2021.
4.
H. Yang, Y. Iida and T. Sasaki, "An analysis of the reliability of an origin-destination trip matrix estimated from traffic counts", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 25, pp. 351-363, Oct. 1991.
5.
H. Yang and J. Zhou, "Optimal traffic counting locations for origin–destination matrix estimation", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 109-126, 1998.
6.
E. Castillo, J. M. Menéndez and P. Jiménezb, "Trip matrix and path flow reconstruction and estimation based on plate scanning and link observations", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 455-481, Jun. 2008.
7.
M. Owais, G. S. Moussa and K. F. Hussain, "Sensor location model for O/D estimation: Multi-criteria meta-heuristics approach", Oper. Res. Perspect., vol. 6, Jan. 2019.
8.
N. Wang, M. Gentili and P. Mirchandani, "Model to locate sensors for estimation of static origin–destination volumes given prior flow information", Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, vol. 2283, no. 1, pp. 67-73, Jan. 2012.
9.
F. Álvarez-Bazo, R. Cerulli, S. Sánchez-Cambronero, M. Gentili and A. Rivas, "An iterative multiparametric approach for determining the location of AVI sensors for robust route flow estimation", Comput. Oper. Res., vol. 138, Feb. 2022.
10.
H. Fu et al., "Optimization of traffic count locations for estimation of travel demands with covariance between origin-destination flows", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 108, pp. 49-73, Nov. 2019.
11.
X. Zhou and G. F. List, "An information-theoretic sensor location model for traffic origin-destination demand estimation applications", Transp. Sci., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 254-273, May 2010.
12.
O. Trullols, M. Fiore, C. Casetti, C. F. Chiasserini and J. M. B. Ordinas, "Planning roadside infrastructure for information dissemination in intelligent transportation systems", Comput. Commun., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 432-442, 2010.
13.
M. Rios, V. Marianov and M. Pérez, "Locating fixed roadside units in a bus transport network for maximum communications probability", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 53, pp. 35-47, Apr. 2015.
14.
P. Li, X. Huang, Y. Fang and P. Lin, "Optimal placement of gateways in vehicular networks", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 3421-3430, Nov. 2007.
15.
J. Barrachina et al., "Road side unit deployment: A density-based approach", IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 30-39, Jul. 2013.
16.
A. Abdrabou and W. Zhuang, "Probabilistic delay control and road side unit placement for vehicular ad hoc networks with disrupted connectivity", IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 129-139, Jan. 2010.
17.
Y. Wang, J. Zheng and N. Mitton, "Delivery delay analysis for roadside unit deployment in vehicular ad hoc networks with intermittent connectivity", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 8591-8602, Oct. 2015.
18.
M. Ng and S. T. Waller, "A static network level model for the information propagation in vehicular ad hoc networks", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 393-407, Jun. 2010.
19.
Y. Liang, N. Ma, X. Li and J. Hu, "Stochastic roadside unit location optimization for information propagation in the Internet of Vehicles", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 13316-13327, Sep. 2021.
20.
Y. Liang, S. Zhang and Y. Wang, "Data-driven road side unit location optimization for connected-autonomous-vehicle-based intersection control", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 128, Jul. 2021.
21.
T. J. Wu, W. Liao and C. J. Chang, "A cost-effective strategy for road-side unit placement in vehicular networks", IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 2295-2303, Aug. 2012.
22.
Y. Liang, Z. Wu and J. Hu, "Road side unit location optimization for optimum link flow determination", Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 61-79, Jan. 2020.
23.
M. Salari, L. Kattan, W. H. Lam, H. Lo and M. A. Esfeh, "Optimization of traffic sensor location for complete link flow observability in traffic network considering sensor failure", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 121, pp. 216-251, Mar. 2019.
24.
M. Ben-Akiva, M. Bierlaire, H. N. Koutsopoulos and R. Mishalani, "Real time simulation of traffic demand-supply interactions within dynamit" in Transportation and Network Analysis: Current Trends, New York, NY, USA:Springer, pp. 19-36, 2002.
25.
H. S. Mahmassani, H. Sbayti and X. Zhou, "DYNASMART-P version 1.0 user’s guide", vol. 137, 2004.
26.
N. Vidyarthi and S. Jayaswal, "Efficient solution of a class of location–allocation problems with stochastic demand and congestion", Comput. Oper. Res., vol. 48, pp. 20-30, Aug. 2014.
27.
D. Z. W. Wang and H. K. Lo, "Global optimum of the linearized network design problem with equilibrium flows", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 482-492, 2010.
28.
R. B. Dial, "A path-based user-equilibrium traffic assignment algorithm that obviates path storage and enumeration", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 917-936, Dec. 2006.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.