Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Improved Frequency Response Model for Power System with Photovoltaic Generation | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Improved Frequency Response Model for Power System with Photovoltaic Generation


Abstract:

With the gradual increase of renewable generation integration, power system with high-penetration photovoltaic(PV) integrated is one of the typical operating scenarios. L...Show More

Abstract:

With the gradual increase of renewable generation integration, power system with high-penetration photovoltaic(PV) integrated is one of the typical operating scenarios. Large-scale PV entry affects the dynamic frequency characteristics of the power system greatly. Based on the analysis of the insufficiency of the traditional power system frequency response (SFR) model, an improved SFR model of the power system with PV generation is established, considering the effect of PV frequency regulation, equivalent governor delay and frequency regulation deadband. Secondly, the parameter calculation method for the improved SFR model is proposed, in which some parameters are achieved by the weighted average of the information of each unit, and the remaining parameters are identified. Finally, the effect of the improved model and parameter calculation method are verified by simulation cases. Simulation results show that the improved SFR model can reflect the frequency response characteristics of the power system, and its accuracy is better than the traditional SFR model.
Date of Conference: 27-29 May 2022
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 11 August 2022
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Nangjing, China

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Power system frequency reflects the active power balance of the system, and once the power disturbance occurs, the system frequency will deviate [1]. If the frequency regulation capability of the power system is insufficient, the low-frequency load shedding protection action may be triggered. In severe cases, the system will be disconnected, resulting in large economic losses [2]. With the gradual increase of renewable generation integration, power system with high-penetration PV integrated is one of the typical operating scenarios. Large-scale PV entry greatly affects the dynamic frequency characteristics of the power system [3]. Therefore, it is necessary to study the frequency dynamic response characteristics of power system with PV generation.

Select All
1.
H. Golpira and A. R. Messina, "A Center-of-Gravity-Based Approach to Estimate Slow Power and Frequency Variations", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1026-1035, Jan. 2018.
2.
N. Ma and D. Wang, "Extracting Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Frequency Dynamic in Large-Scale Power Grids", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 2654-2662, Jul. 2019.
3.
Y. Su et al., "An Adaptive PV Frequency Control Strategy Based on Real-Time Inertia Estimation", IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 2355-2364, May 2021.
4.
G. Kou, P. Markham, S. Hadley, T. King and Y. Liu, "Impact of Governor Deadband on Frequency Response of the U.S. Eastern Interconnection", IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1368-1377, May 2016.
5.
R. Chang, C. Lu and T. Hsiao, "Prediction of frequency response after generator outage using regression tree", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2146-2147, Nov. 2005.
6.
L. S. Moulin, A. P. A. da Silva, M. A. El-Sharkawi and R. J. Marks, "Support vector machines for transient stability analysis of large-scale power systems", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 818-825, May 2004.
7.
M. Alizadeh and T. Amraee, "Adaptive scheme for local prediction of postcontingency power system frequency", Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 107, pp. 240-249, Feb. 2014.
8.
P. M. Anderson and M. Mirheydar, "A low-order system frequency response model", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 720-729, Aug. 1990.
9.
I. Egido, F. Femandez-Bemal, P. Centeno and L. Rouco, "Maximum Frequency Deviation Calculation in Small Isolated Power Systems", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1731-1738, Nov. 2009.
10.
M. L. Chan, R. D. Dunlop and F. Schweppe, "Dynamic Equivalents for Average System Frequency Behavior Following Major Distribances", IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst., vol. PAS-91, no. 4, pp. 1637-1642, Jul. 1972.
11.
P. Vorobev, D. M. Greenwood, J. H. Bell, J. W. Bialek, P. C. Taylor and K. Turitsyn, "Deadbands Droop and Inertia Impact on Power System Frequency Distribution", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 3098-3108, Jul. 2019.
12.
L. Liu, W. Li, Y. Ba, J. Shen, C. Jin and K. Wen, "An Analytical Model for Frequency Nadir Prediction Following a Major Disturbance", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 2527-2536, July 2020.
13.
J. Tang, H. He, G. Yang, S. Xiao and M. Li, "Power System Multi-Machine Frequency Response Model Aggregation of Thermal Power Unit and Hydro Turbine Generator", 2020 7th International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering (ICISCE), pp. 2031-2035, 2020.
14.
J. Dai, Y. Tang, Q. Wang and P. Jiang, "Aggregation Frequency Response Modeling for Wind Power Plants with Primary Frequency Regulation Service", IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 108561-108570, 2019.
15.
H. Huang et al., "Generic System Frequency Response Model for Power Grids with Different Generations", IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 14314-14321, 2020.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.