The Review for Visual Analytics Methodology | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

The Review for Visual Analytics Methodology


Abstract:

Big data usage evolves from previously looking into the capacity of big data's descriptive and diagnostic perspectives into currently feeding the demands for predictive b...Show More

Abstract:

Big data usage evolves from previously looking into the capacity of big data's descriptive and diagnostic perspectives into currently feeding the demands for predictive big data analytics. The needs come about due to organizations that crave predictive analytics capabilities to reduce risk, make intelligent decisions, and generate different customer experiences. Similarly, visual analytics play an essential role in understanding and fitting the analytics prediction in their business decision. Hence, the combination of descriptive, diagnostics and predictive within Visual Analytics emerges as a balanced field to provide understandable predictive insight. Due to the organizational demand and multi-discipline area, the approach to developing visual analytics is still uncertain in the Big Data Project Lifecycle from methodological perspectives. While there are a few potential methodological approaches that could be used for visual analytics, they are scattered across numerous academic research and industrial practice. To date, there is no coherent review and analysis of the work that has been explored specifically for Visual Analytics methodology. This paper reports on a review of previous literature concerning how Visual Analytics has been executed in the big data life cycle to address the gap. The review is organized in this study from three perspectives: i) general ICT -related methodology (e.g. SDLC, Agile, DevOps), ii) Data Science-related methodology (e.g. CRISP-DM, SEMMA, KDD) and iii) Visual Analytics-related methodologies in which each method will be benchmarked based on the Visual Analytics major part of reality, computer and human, in terms of its width, depth, and flows. This study found insufficiencies, non-specific and vague conditions in handling the Visual Analytics when using current methodological approaches based on the review conducted. The paper also highlights the Visual Analytics-related methodological review, which can shed some light on the appr...
Date of Conference: 09-11 June 2022
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 27 June 2022
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Ankara, Turkey
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Big data refers to massive, complex structured and unstructured data sets that are rapidly generated and transmitted from a wide variety of sources. It extracts value from the data and analyzes insights that lead to better decisions and strategic business moves. Big data usage evolves from descriptive, diagnostics, and more recently to predictions capabilities. As a result, Predictive Visual Analytics is currently in high demand for business and organization [1]. This is because organizations require predictive capabilities to reduce risk, make intelligent decisions, and generate different customer experiences. It attracts many industrial players to implement predictive analytics in their business [2]. In parallel, visual analytics play an essential role in understanding and fitting the analytics prediction in their business decisions. Hence, there is a need to embed prediction in visual analytics and becomes balanced to provide understandable predictive insights. When carefully executed, it can provide practical insights and predictions by analyzing current and historical data.

Select All
1.
Y. Lu, R. Garcia, B. Hansen, M. Gleicher and R. Maciejewski, "The State-of-the-Art in Predictive Visual Analytics", Comput. Graph. Forum, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 539-562, 2017.
2.
M. Attaran and S. Attaran, "Opportunities and challenges of implementing predictive analytics for competitive advantage", Int. J. Bus. Intell. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1-26, 2018.
3.
A. Malik, R. Maciejewski, S. Towers, S. McCullough and D. S. Ebert, "Proactive spatiotemporal resource allocation and predictive visual analytics for community policing and law enforcement", IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1863-1872, 2014.
4.
J. Yue, A. Raja, D. Liu, X. Wang and W. Ribarsky, "A blackboard-based approach towards predictive analytics", AAAI Spring Symp.-Tech. Rep., vol. SS-09-09, pp. 154-161, 2009.
5.
J. J. Caban and D. Gotz, "Visual analytics in healthcare - opportunities and research challenges", J. Am. Med. Informatics Assoc., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 260-262, 2015.
6.
J. Lu et al., "Recent progress and trends in predictive visual analytics", Front. Comput. Sci., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 192-207, 2017.
7.
S. Mukherjee, "Predictive Analytics and Predictive Modeling in Healthcare", SSRN Electron. J., June 2019.
8.
D. Keim et al., Visual Analytics: Definition Process and Challenges To cite this version: Visual Analytics: Definition Process and Challenges, 2008.
9.
S. Amri, H. Ltifi and M. Ben Ayed, "A Predictive Visual Analytics Evaluation Approach Based on Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System", Comput. J., vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 977-1000, 2019.
10.
N. Andrienko et al., "Viewing Visual Analytics as Model Building", Comput. Graph. Forum, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 275-299, 2018.
11.
K. Sedig and P. Parsons, "Interaction Design for Complex Cognitive Activities with Visual Representations: A Pattern-Based Approach", AIS Trans. Human-Computer Interact., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 84-133, 2013.
12.
D. Keim and J. Thomas, "Scope and Challenges of Visual Analytics", IEEE Vis. Conf. 2007, vol. 4404, no. 4404, pp. 1-58, 2008.
13.
Gartner Data & Analytics Summit (November 2017) Frankfurt Germany, 2017, [online] Available: https://gartner/eu/datade.
14.
J. Scholtz, C. Plaisant, M. Whiting and G. Grinstein, "Evaluation of visual analytics environments: The road to the Visual Analytics Science and Technology challenge evaluation methodology", Inf. Vis., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 326-335, 2014.
15.
S. Yaacob, N. M. Ali, H. N. Liang, N. Z. A. Rahim, N. Maarop and R. Ali, "Giving the boss the big picture: Demonstrating convergence visualization design principles using business intelligence and analytical tools", J. Fundam. Appl. Sci., pp. 1-8, 2018.
16.
A. O. Elfaki and Z. Bassfar, "Construction of a Software Development Model for Managing Final Year Projects in Information Technology Programmes", Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 15, no. 21, pp. 4-23, 2020.
17.
Z. Ibrahim, M. D. G. M. D. Johar and N. R. A. Rahman, "An efficiency and effectively of methodology in software development workflow based on Malaysia", Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 526-536, 2018.
18.
S. Malik, "Software Testing: Essential Phase of SDLC and a Comparative Study of Software Testing Techniques", Int. J. Syst. Softw. Eng., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 38-45, 2017.
19.
F. C. Aguboshim and G. S. Miles, "Well-Defined Interface Development Process: An Important Interface Design Strategy to Create Easy-to-use Banking ATM System Interfaces in Nigeria", Int. J. Eng. Sci. Comput., vol. 8, no. 15, pp. 19514-19525, 2018.
20.
D. K. Ahmad, M. F. Ahmad, M. N. Ahmad and A. S. Ahmad, "An Experiment of Animation Development in Hypertext Preprocessor (PHP) and Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)", Int. J. Sci. Res. Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 45-51, 2020.
21.
H. Khalajzadeh, M. Abdelrazek, J. Grundy, J. Hosking and Q. He, "A Survey of Current End-User Data Analytics Tool Support", Proc.-2018 IEEE Int. Congr. Big Data BigData Congr. 2018 - Part 2018 IEEE World Congr. Serv., pp. 41-48, 2018.
22.
L. BANICA, M. RADULESCU, D. ROSCA and A. HAGIU, "Is DevOps another Project Management Methodology?", Inform. Econ., vol. 21, no. 3/2017, pp. 39-51, 2017.
23.
A. Hemon, B. Lyonnet, F. Rowe and B. Fitzgerald, "Conceptualizing the transition from agile to DevOps: A maturity model for a smarter is function", IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 2019.
24.
P. Perera, R. Silva and I. Perera, "Improve software quality through practicing DevOps", 17th Int. Conf. Adv. ICT Emerg. Reg. ICTer 2017 - Proc., vol. 2018-Janua, no. September 2017, pp. 13-18, 2017.
25.
B. Meyers, K. Gadeyne, B. Oakes, M. Bernaerts, H. Vangheluwe and J. Denil, "A model-driven engineering framework to support the functional safety process", Proc.-2019 ACM/IEEE 22nd Int. Conf. Model Driven Eng. Lang. Syst. Companion Model. 2019, pp. 619-623, 2019.
26.
O. Krancher, P. Luther and M. Jost, "Key Affordances of Platform-as-a-Service: Self-Organization and Continuous Feedback", J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 2018.
27.
G. Kim, J. Humble, P. Debois and J. Willis, "The DevOps Handbook: How to Create World-Class Agility Reliability and Security in Technology Organizations" in The DevOps handbook, 2016.
28.
A. Mateen, M. Tabassum and A. Rehan, Combining Agile with Traditional V Model for Enhancement of Maturity in Software Development, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 280-296, 2017.
29.
B. Kotaiah and M. A. Khalil, "Approaches for development of Software Projects: Agile methodology", Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 6, 2017.
30.
J. Highsmith, C. Consortium and A. Cockburn, Development: The Business of Innovation.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.