Processing math: 100%
Design and Characterization of a Multi-Processed Differential Magnetic Field Probe by Using Asymmetric Calibration Method | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Design and Characterization of a Multi-Processed Differential Magnetic Field Probe by Using Asymmetric Calibration Method


Abstract:

In order to improve the spatial resolution of a magnetic near field probe, the design method combining multiple ports with multiple production processes has been proven e...Show More

Abstract:

In order to improve the spatial resolution of a magnetic near field probe, the design method combining multiple ports with multiple production processes has been proven effective. However, the asymmetry of transmission structure introduced by the junction between two different processes is a key problem that limits the performance of these probes. In this paper, a differential magnetic near field probe (diff-H-probe) combining flexible printed circuit (FPC) process with print circuit board (PCB) process has been manufactured to achieve high spatial resolution. The measurement results show that this probe can recognize a serpentine line with 100~\mu \text{m} -width of trace and 100~\mu \text{m} -space between traces. Meanwhile, an asymmetric calibration method (ACM) has been applied to significantly improve the performance of the diff-H-probe. Some key parameters of the probe with and without using the ACM are compared by using an air-dielectric microstrip line. The compared results show that the detection frequency range of the proposed probe is broaden to 12 GHz. Moreover, the results also demonstrate that the ACM can improve the differential electric field suppression up to 4.1 dB and improve the common mode electric field suppression to 20 dB at the frequency below 12 GHz.
Published in: IEEE Sensors Journal ( Volume: 22, Issue: 6, 15 March 2022)
Page(s): 5723 - 5731
Date of Publication: 31 January 2022

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

Citations are not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Magnetic near field measurement technique has been paid more attention in recent years [1]–[6]. Many techniques can be used to realize magnetic field measurement, such as fluxgate (FG) sensors [7], [8], optical pumping (OP) sensors [9], [10], superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) sensors [11], diamond nitrogen-vacancy center (DNVC) sensors [3], [12], and near field probe [2], [4], [13]. They are widely used for shielding effectiveness analysis [14], [15], fault detection of device [1], [16], high sensitivity magnetic field measurement [11], nondestructive inspection of suspicious areas on cryptographic large-scale integration chips [17], electromagnetic interference prediction [18] and electromagnetic emission analysis of integrated circuits in IEC 61967 [19], [20]. In general, FG and OP sensors are more suitable for high sensitivity magnetic field measurement with frequency range below several hundreds kHz. The SQUID sensor based on the principle of low temperature superconductivity is more suitable for high sensitivity magnetic field measurement, its frequency range usually below several hundreds MHz and the spatial resolution is usually several (such as Magma EFI HiRes). The DNVC sensor is usually suitable for high spatial resolution magnetic field measurement, its spatial resolution can reach several tens nm (such as QSM system of Qzabre). Compared with these sensors mentioned above, near field probes in IEC61967 [19], [20] have the advantages of low production cost, simple application configuration and wide detection frequency band. It is mainly used in near field scanning analysis, such as radiation emission evaluation and coupling path analysis of electronic products.

Cites in Papers - |

Cites in Papers - IEEE (13)

Select All
1.
Caixu Yu, Lei Wang, Duan Nie, Deren Feng, Jun Luo, Weiheng Shao, "Systematic Characterization on a Four-Port Three-Component Near-Field Probing System", IEEE Sensors Journal, vol.25, no.3, pp.4757-4768, 2025.
2.
Yu Tian, Xing-Chang Wei, Di Wang, Richard Xian-Ke Gao, "A Slot-Type Ez Probe With a Lower Effective Center", IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol.67, no.1, pp.33-41, 2025.
3.
Weiheng Shao, Caixu Yu, Duan Nie, Zhizhe Wang, Xinxin Tian, Lei Wang, "Four-Port Asymmetric Correction for Simultaneous Multicomponent EM-Field Measurement", IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol.73, pp.1-9, 2024.
4.
Lijuan Huang, Jinfu Liao, Zhanjun Huang, Weiheng Shao, Yan Chen, Lei Wang, Zhiqiang Yi, Yangyang Zhou, Jianying Wang, "Design and Calibration of an Ungrounded Double-Loop Active Differential Magnetic Probe", IEEE Sensors Journal, vol.24, no.6, pp.8026-8035, 2024.
5.
Weiheng Shao, Caixu Yu, Xinxin Tian, Zhanjun Huang, Wanqing Jing, Chengyang Luo, Litao Ruan, Yinghui Chen, Shan Xue, Duo-Long Wu, "A Virtual Network Matching Method for Correcting Asymmetric Near-Field Probing System", IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol.73, pp.1-10, 2024.
6.
Weiheng Shao, Shan Xue, Xinxin Tian, Liuxing He, Hongyue Wang, Yangyang Zhou, Changjian Zhou, Yiqiang Chen, "An Advanced Forward Asymmetric Correction Method for an Electromagnetic Near-Field Probing System", IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol.72, no.2, pp.1661-1672, 2024.
7.
Yu Tian, Xing-Chang Wei, Di Wang, Richard Xian-Ke Gao, "A Miniature Electric Probe With a High Spatial Resolution", IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol.73, pp.1-8, 2024.
8.
Hui Li, Weiheng Shao, Xinxin Tian, Duo-Long Wu, Litao Ruan, Shan Xue, "Comparative Analysis of Several Near-Field Probes for Magnetic Field Measurements", IEEE Sensors Journal, vol.23, no.23, pp.28723-28732, 2023.
9.
Weiheng Shao, Yinghui Chen, Lijuan Huang, Wenxiao Fang, "An Asymmetric Correction Method for the Differential Double-Loop Magnetic Field Probing System", IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol.71, no.10, pp.8372-8377, 2023.
10.
Zhiqiang Yi, Weiheng Shao, Xinxin Tian, Yiqiang Chen, Yang Gao, "A Broadband Active Dual Probe by Asymmetric Calibration Method", IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol.71, no.10, pp.8366-8371, 2023.
11.
Weiheng Shao, Hui Li, Zhanjun Huang, Xin-Xin Tian, Lianghua Ye, Yiqiang Chen, Xiao He, "Asymmetric Calibration and Characterization for Diff-Port Magnetic Field Probing System", IEEE Sensors Journal, vol.23, no.10, pp.10559-10567, 2023.
12.
Xinxin Tian, Shan Xue, Weiheng Shao, Duo-Long Wu, "Ultrawideband De-Embedding Calibration for Magnetic Field Probes by Using Symmetric GCPW Calibrators", IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol.71, no.5, pp.4246-4253, 2023.
13.
Weiheng Shao, Hui Li, Xinxin Tian, Bo Hou, Shan Xue, Duo-Long Wu, Wenxiao Fang, Yiqiang Chen, Changjian Zhou, "An Ultrawideband Asymmetric Calibration Method for a Simultaneously Electromagnetic Near-Field Probing System", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol.71, no.3, pp.1083-1092, 2023.

Cites in Papers - Other Publishers (5)

1.
Xin Cheng, Chenhan Jiang, Manish Nagar, Preeti Thakur, Fayu Wan, Atul Thakur, "Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of conformal structures based on near-field scanning: A review", Measurement, pp.115828, 2024.
2.
Wentao Zhao, Chao Zhang, Jianguo Wang, Fengshou Gu, Oscar García Peyrano, Shuai Wang, Da Lv, "Application and research trend of digital twin in measurement technology", Measurement Science and Technology, vol.35, no.11, pp.112003, 2024.
3.
Jianke Li, Shan Xue, Chengyang Luo, Zongqi Cai, Yan Chen, Yuan Chi, "Simultaneous electromagnetic field probing system with Y‐shaped separation detection structure", IET Science, Measurement & Technology, 2024.
4.
Xiao He, Lijuan Huang, Dezhi Zeng, Bo Hou, Yuan Chi, En Li, "Asymmetric calibration method on a back‐to‐back double‐loop differential magnetic field probe", IET Science, Measurement & Technology, 2023.
5.
Hui Li, Weiheng Shao, Xinxin Tian, Shan Xue, Duo?Long Wu, Bo Hou, "De?embedding calibration for an electromagnetic dual probe using GCPW", Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 2023.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.