A Generative Adversarial Network Based Learning Approach to the Autonomous Decision Making of High-Speed Trains | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

A Generative Adversarial Network Based Learning Approach to the Autonomous Decision Making of High-Speed Trains


Abstract:

Nowadays, the autonomous driving transportation systems are at the heart of both academic and industry research for the distinguished advantages including increased netwo...Show More

Abstract:

Nowadays, the autonomous driving transportation systems are at the heart of both academic and industry research for the distinguished advantages including increased network capacity, enhanced punctuality, greater flexibility and improved overall safety level. With the responsibility of transporting passengers in a safe, comfortable and efficient way, the decision making method plays a critical position in the autonomous driving of high-speed trains. Focusing on solving the autonomous decision making problem, this paper proposes a novel learning based framework by combining the deep learning technology with the distributed tracking control approach. To cope with the data insufficiency problem in training the deep learning network, a generative adversarial network (GAN) based data argumentation scheme is proposed to generate data samples that have the same distribution with actual data samples, and a hybrid learning network is constructed to predict the speed trajectory from the multi-attribute data with both temporal sequences and static features. Then, based on the model predictive control (MPC) scheme, a distributed tracking control model is formulated to minimize the tracking deviations and balance the performance of punctuality, energy-efficiency and riding comfort. Further, the dual decomposition technique is adopted to deal with the coupling constraints for the safe distance headway such that the separation for the autonomous driving of high-speed trains is achieved. Finally, simulation experiments based on actual scenarios of the Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railway are conducted to illustrate the effectiveness of our methods.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology ( Volume: 71, Issue: 3, March 2022)
Page(s): 2399 - 2412
Date of Publication: 11 January 2022

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Over the last decades, there has been great attentions dedicated to the research of autonomous vehicles. The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) and communication technologies has made it possible for autonomous vehicles to enter into a wide range of transportation applications [1]–[3]. The decision making system, which is responsible for enhancing operational safety, improving traffic capacity and alleviating driver fatigue, is one of the most crucial technologies for autonomous vehicles. For the high-speed railways, the high level of safety, punctuality, riding comfort and complex environment puts a strict requirement on the development of the decision making system for the autonomous driving of high-speed trains.

Select All
1.
S. Gao, H. Dong, B. Ning and Q. Zhang, "Cooperative prescribed performance tracking control for multiple high-speed trains in moving block signaling system", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 2740-2749, Jul. 2019.
2.
L. Dong, D. Sun, G. Han, X. Li, Q. Hu and L. Shu, "Velocity-free localization of autonomous driverless vehicles in underground intelligent mines", IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech., vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 9292-9303, Sep. 2020.
3.
Z. Luan, J. Zhang, W. Zhao and C. Wang, "Trajectory tracking control of autonomous vehicle with random network delay", IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech., vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 8140-8150, Aug. 2020.
4.
C. Katrakazas, M. Quddus, W.-H. Chen and L. Deka, "Real-time motion planning methods for autonomous on-road driving: State-of-the-art and future research directions", Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol., vol. 60, pp. 416-442, 2015.
5.
C. Zhang, D. Chu, S. Liu, Z. Deng, C. Wu and X. Su, "Trajectory planning and tracking for autonomous vehicle based on state lattice and model predictive control", IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 29-40, 2019.
6.
S. Glaser, B. Vanholme, S. Mammar, D. Gruyer and L. Nouveliere, "Maneuver-based trajectory planning for highly autonomous vehicles on real road with traffic and driver interaction", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 589-606, Sep. 2010.
7.
L. Ma, J. Xue, K. Kawabata, J. Zhu, C. Ma and N. Zheng, "A fast RRT algorithm for motion planning of autonomous road vehicles", Proc. 17th Int. IEEE Conf. Intell. Trans. Syst., pp. 1033-1038, 2014.
8.
T. Hegedus, B. Nemeth and P. Gaspar, "Design of a low-complexity graph-based motion-planning algorithm for autonomous vehicles", Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 21, pp. 10217716, 2020.
9.
U. Simon and M. Markus, "Probabilistic online POMDP decision making for lane changes in fully automated driving", Proc. 16th Int. IEEE Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst., pp. 2063-2067, 2013.
10.
S. Robin, "Evaluating the utility of driving: Toward automated decision making under uncertainty", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 354-364, Mar. 2012.
11.
A. Kendall et al., "Learning to drive in a day", Proc. Int. Conf. Robot. Automat., pp. 8248-8254, 2019.
12.
A. Zyner, S. Worrall and E. Nebot, "Naturalistic driver intention and path prediction using recurrent neural networks", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1584-1594, Apr. 2020.
13.
L. Hou, L. Xin, S. E. Li, B. Cheng and W. Wang, "Interactive trajectory prediction of surrounding road users for autonomous driving using structural-LSTM network", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 4615-4625, Nov. 2020.
14.
S. Lefevre, A. Carvalho and F. Borrelli, "A learning-based framework for velocity control in autonomous driving", IEEE Trans. Automat. Sci. Eng., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 32-42, Jan. 2016.
15.
A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever and G. E. Hinton, "Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks", Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 25, pp. 1097-1105, 2012.
16.
J. Snell, K. Swersky and R. S. Zemel, "Prototypical networks for few-shot learning", Proc. 31st Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., pp. 4080-4090, 2017.
17.
A. Antoniou, A. Storkey and H. Edwards, "Augmenting image classifiers using data augmentation generative adversarial networks", Int. Conf. Artif. Neural Netw., pp. 594-603, 2018.
18.
Y. Chen, Y. Lv and F.-Y. Wang, "Traffic flow imputation using parallel data and generative adversarial networks", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1624-1630, Apr. 2020.
19.
C. Wu, S. Gao and H. Dong, "Adaptive prescribed performance control for nonlinear pure-feedback systems: A scalarly virtual parameter adaptation approach", Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 2597-2615, 2020.
20.
H. Dong, X. Lin, S. Gao, B. Cai and B. Ning, "Neural networks-based sliding mode fault-tolerant control for high-speed trains with bounded parameters and actuator faults", IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech., vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 1353-1362, Feb. 2020.
21.
Y. Zhao, T. Wang and H. R. Karimi, "Distributed cruise control of high-speed trains", J. Franklin Inst., vol. 354, no. 14, pp. 6044-6061, 2017.
22.
H. Zhao, X. Dai, Q. Zhang and J. Ding, "Robust event-triggered model predictive control for multiple high-speed trains with switching topologies", IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 4700-4710, May 2020.
23.
X. Wang, L. Zhu, H. Wang, T. Tang and K. Li, "Robust distributed cruise control of multiple high-speed trains based on disturbance observer", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 267-279, Jan. 2021.
24.
H. Zheng, R. R. Negenborn and G. Lodewijks, "Fast ADMM for distributed model predictive control of cooperative waterborne AGVs", IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1406-1413, Jul. 2017.
25.
S. Dixit et al., "Trajectory planning for autonomous high-speed overtaking in structured environments using robust MPC", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 2310-2323, Jun. 2020.
26.
X. Wang, S. Li and T. Tang, "Robust efficient cruise control for heavy haul train via the state-dependent intermittent control", Nonlinear Anal.: Hybrid Syst., vol. 38, pp. 100918, 2020.
27.
X. Wang, S. Li, T. Tang, X. Wang and J. Xun, "Intelligent operation of heavy haul train with data imbalance: A machine learning method", Knowl.-Based Syst., vol. 163, pp. 36-50, 2019.
28.
S. Gao, J. Wei, H. Song, Z. Zhang, H. Dong and X. Hu, "Fuzzy adaptive automatic train operation control with protection constraints: A residual nonlinearity approximation-based approach", Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 96, pp. 103986, 2020.
29.
X. Ma, Z. Tao, Y. Wang, H. Yu and Y. Wang, "Long short-term memory neural network for traffic speed prediction using remote microwave sensor data", Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol., vol. 54, pp. 187-197, 2015.
30.
Y. Liu, Z. Liu and R. Jia, "DeepPF: A deep learning based architecture for metro passenger flow prediction", Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol., vol. 101, pp. 18-34, 2019.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.