I. Introduction
In many practical systems, the sparse impulse responses are often encountered, i.e., the signal vectors representing such responses consist of only a few nonnegligible components, while the other components are zero. Typical examples include spectrum sensing in cognitive radio [1], imaging denoising [2], and comparative genomic hybridization [3]. However, conventional adaptive algorithms for system identification, which include the least mean-square (LMS) algorithm [4] and the recursive least square (RLS) algorithm [5], do not consider the a priori information of sparsity in the cost function. Exploiting the a priori information about the sparsity of these vectors properly when designing adaptive algorithms has proven to lead to significant improvement for identifying sparse impulsive response [6], [7], [9]. In these works, the - or -norm of parameter estimate is incorporated into the mean-square error (MSE) objective function. More recently, inspired by superiority of distributed estimation over noncooperated estimation [10], [13], the study on identifying sparse vector has been generalized to the context of distributed adaptive estimation. Typical examples include the sparse incremental LMS algorithm [8], the sparse diffusion LMS algorithm [21], [22], and the proportionate diffusion LMS (PDLMS) algorithm [23]. Compared to the incremental-type [14], [15] distributed estimation, the diffusion-type [16]–[18] distributed estimation is more frequently used due to its power learning ability and strong robustness. Therefore, we focus on the diffusion-type distributed estimation for sparse vector in this article.