Contents Earables are becoming a permanent augmentation of the human ear, offering meaningful and engaging hearing experiences and enhancements. Recently, sensory research in and around the ear has sharply risen as earables can transform how we perceive and experience sound, i.e., spatially aware, distraction-free, and personalized. However, earables can also revolutionize personal health and clinical research by enabling noninvasive, continuous, and accurate health monitoring. Due to its proximity to brain and eyes, earables can be used to monitor a plethora of biomarkers like eye-movements, cerebral activity (EEG), or heart-related photoplethysmography (PPG) signals. Indeed, in the pervasive computing literature, we have already seen ear-worn devices applied for continuous monitoring of cardiovascular functions, heart rate and stress, sleep, measurement of oxygen consumption and blood flow, and tracking dietary and swallowing activities.
Abstract:
Earables are now pervasive, and their established purpose, ergonomy, and noninvasive interaction uncover exciting opportunities for sensing and healthcare research. Howev...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
Earables are now pervasive, and their established purpose, ergonomy, and noninvasive interaction uncover exciting opportunities for sensing and healthcare research. However, it is critical to understand and characterize sensory measurements’ accuracy in earables impacting healthcare decisions. We report a systematic characterization of in-ear photoplethysmography (PPG) in measuring vital signs: heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), blood oxygen saturation (SpO_22), and respiration rate (RR). We explore in-ear PPG inaccuracies stemming from different sensor placements and motion-induced artifacts. We observe statistically significant differences across sensor placements and between artifact types, with ITC placement showing the lowest intersubject variability. However, our study shows the absolute error climbs up to 29.84, 24.09, 3.28, and 30.80%, respectively, for HR, HRV, SpO_22, and RR during motion activities. Our preliminary results suggest that in-ear PPG is reasonably accurate in detecting vital signs but demands careful mechanical design and signal processing treatment.
Published in: IEEE Pervasive Computing ( Volume: 21, Issue: 1, 01 Jan.-March 2022)
References is not available for this document.
Select All
1.
Ľ. Hládek, B. Porr and W. O. Brimijoin, "Real-time estimation of horizontal gaze angle by saccade integration using in-ear electrooculography", PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 1, 2018.
2.
A. Nguyen et al., "A lightweight and inexpensive in-ear sensing system for automatic whole-night sleep stage monitoring", Proc. 14th ACM Conf. Embedded Netw. Sensor Syst. CD-ROM, pp. 230-244, 2016.
3.
M. Lueken et al., "Photoplethysmography-based in-ear sensor system for identification of increased stress arousal in everyday life" in Proc. IEEE 14th Int. Conf. Wearable Implantable Body Sensor Netw., pp. 83-86.
4.
"Evaluating innovative in-ear pulse oximetry for unobtrusive cardiovascular and pulmonary monitoring during sleep", IEEE J. Transl. Eng. Health Med., vol. 1, Aug. 2013.
5.
S. F. LeBoeuf et al., "Earbud-based sensor for the assessment of energy expenditure heart rate and VO2max", Med. Sci. Sports Exercise, vol. 46, no. 5, 2014.
6.
"A machine learning-empowered system for long-term motion-tolerant wearable monitoring of blood pressure and heart rate with ear-ECG/PPG", IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 10547-10561, 2017.
7.
S. Bi et al., "Auracle: Detecting eating episodes with an ear-mounted sensor", Proc. ACM Interactive Mobile Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1-27, 2018.
8.
J. A. C. Patterson, D. C. McIlwraith and G.-Z. Yang, "A flexible low noise reflective PPG sensor platform for ear-worn heart rate monitoring" in Proc. 6th Int. Workshop Wearable Implantable Body Sensor Netw., pp. 286-291.
9.
Bent et al., "Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors", NPJ Digit. Med., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2020.
10.
P. M. Prendergast, "Anatomy of the external ear" in Advanced Cosmetic Otoplasty, Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, pp. 15-21, 2013.
11.
S.-K. Stavrakos and S. Ahmed-Kristensen, "Assessment of anthropometric methods in headset design", Proc. Des. 12th Int. Des. Conf., pp. 1123-1132, 2012.
12.
N. Hjortskov et al., "Development of a signal processing library for extraction of SpO2 HR HRV and RR from photoplethysmographic waveforms", Sports Med, vol. 33, no. 1-2, pp. 147, 2003.
13.
C. Lee, H. S. Shin and M. Lee, "Relations between AC-DC components and optical path length in photoplethysmography", J. Biomed. Opt, vol. 16, no. 7, Jul. 2011.
14.
P. H. Charlton et al., "An assessment of algorithms to estimate respiratory rate from the electrocardiogram and photoplethysmogram", Physiol. Meas., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 610-626, 2016.
15.
Y. S. Can et al., "Continuous stress detection using wearable sensors in real life: Algorithmic programming contest case study", Sensors, vol. 19, no. 8, 2019.
16.
M. Shafique and P. A. Kyriacou, "Photoplethysmographic signals and blood oxygen saturation values during artificial hypothermia in healthy volunteers", Physiol. Meas., vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2065-2078, 2012.
17.
M. A. Russo, D. M. Santarelli and D. O’Rourke, "The physiological effects of slow breathing in the healthy human", Breathe, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 298-309, 2017.
18.
F. Kawsar et al., "Earables for personal-scale behavior analytics", IEEE Pervasive Comput., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 83-89, Jul.–Sep. 2018.
19.
ANSI/CTA-2065, Hopewell, VA, USA:Consumer Technology Association, 2018.
20.
T. Röddiger et al., "Towards respiration rate monitoring using an in-ear headphone inertial measurement unit", Proc. 1st Int. Workshop Earable Comput, pp. 48-53, 2019.
