Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Deformation-Aware Robotic 3D Ultrasound | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Abstract:

Tissue deformation in ultrasound (US) imaging leads to geometrical errors when measuring tissues due to the pressure exerted by probes. Such deformation has an even large...Show More

Abstract:

Tissue deformation in ultrasound (US) imaging leads to geometrical errors when measuring tissues due to the pressure exerted by probes. Such deformation has an even larger effect on 3D US volumes as the correct compounding is limited by the inconsistent location and geometry. This work proposes a patient-specified stiffness-based method to correct the tissue deformations in robotic 3D US acquisitions. To obtain the patient-specified model, robotic palpation is performed at sampling positions on the tissue. The contact force, US images and probe poses of the palpation procedure are recorded. The contact force and the probe poses are used to estimate the nonlinear tissue stiffness. The images are fed to an optical flow algorithm to compute the pixel displacement. Then the pixel-wise tissue deformation under different forces is characterized by a coupled quadratic regression. To correct the deformation at unseen positions on the trajectory for building 3D volumes, an interpolation is performed based on the stiffness values computed at the sampling positions. With the stiffness and recorded force, the tissue displacement could be corrected. The method was validated on two blood vessel phantoms with different stiffness. The results demonstrate that the method can effectively correct the force-induced deformation and finally generate 3D tissue geometries.
Published in: IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters ( Volume: 6, Issue: 4, October 2021)
Page(s): 7675 - 7682
Date of Publication: 26 July 2021

ISSN Information:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Ultrasound (US) is a broadly utilized diagnostic imaging modality for examinations of internal organs. It is also commonly used to obtain the location and geometric information of disease intraoperatively as US imaging is highly available, non-invasive and radiation-free. However, to obtain optimal acoustic coupling of a US transducer and thus achieve good visibility of target anatomies, a certain pressure is required to be applied to the imaged anatomy. Due to the exerted pressure, the shape distortion of visualized tissue structures is inevitable, particularly for soft tissues such as superficial blood vessels (Fig. 1). The shape of the cephalic vein continues to compress when the contact force increases. The vein loses its complete lumen when the force increases to . As a result, the distortion can severely obfuscate the geometrical measurements of subsurface targets, e.g., measuring blood vessel diameter for diagnosing vascular stenosis.

Select All
1.
K. Pfister, W. Schierling, E. M. Jung, H. Apfelbeck, C. Hennersperger and P. M. Kasprzak, "Standardized 2d ultrasound versus 3d/4d ultrasound and image fusion for measurement of aortic aneurysm diameter in follow-up after evar", Clin. Hemorheology Microcirculation, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 249-260, 2016.
2.
S. Virga, R. Göbl, M. Baust, N. Navab and C. Hennersperger, "Use the force: deformation correction in robotic 3D ultrasound", Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 619-627, 2018.
3.
G. M. Treece, R. W. Prager, A. H. Gee and L. Berman, "Correction of probe pressure artifacts in freehand 3d ultrasound", Image Anal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 199-214, 2002.
4.
M. R. Burcher, L. Han and J. A. Noble, "Deformation correction in ultrasound images using contact force measurements", Proc. IEEE Workshop Math. Methods Biomed. Image Anal., pp. 63-70, 2001.
5.
B. Flack, M. Makhinya and O. Goksel, "Model-based compensation of tissue deformation during data acquisition for interpolative ultrasound simulation", Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag., pp. 502-505, 2016.
6.
J. Dahmani, Y. Petit and C. Laporte, "Model-based correction of ultrasound image deformations due to probe pressure", Proc. Med. Imag.: Image Process., vol. , 2017.
7.
S.-Y Sun, B. W. Anthony and M. W. Gilbertson, "Trajectory-based deformation correction in ultrasound images", Proc. Med. Imag. Ultrason. Imag. Tomography Ther. Int. Soc. Opt. Photon., vol. 7629, pp. 76290A, 2010.
8.
Z. Jiang, , , et al., "Automatic normal positioning of robotic ultrasound probe based only on confidence map optimization and force measurement", IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1342-1349, Apr. 2020.
9.
M. W. Gilbertson and B. W. Anthony, "Force and position control system for freehand ultrasound", IEEE Trans. Robot, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 835-849, Aug. 2015.
10.
Z. Jiang et al., "Autonomous robotic screening of tubular structures based only on real-time ultrasound imaging feedback", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2021.
11.
Q. Huang, J. Lan and X. Li, "Robotic arm based automatic ultrasound scanning for three-dimensional imaging", IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1173-1182, Feb. 2019.
12.
Z. Jiang, M. Grimm, M. Zhou, Y. Hu, J. Esteban and N. Navab, "Automatic force-based probe positioning for precise robotic ultrasound acquisition", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2020.
13.
Z. Jiang et al., "Motion-aware robotic 3d ultrasound".
14.
C. Hennersperger et al., "Towards MRI-based autonomous robotic us acquisitions: a first feasibility study", IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 538-548, Feb. 2017.
15.
B. D. Lucas, et al., "An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision", Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell, pp. 674-679, 1981.
16.
D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, "Adam: A method for stochastic optimization", 2014.
17.
T. S. Pheiffer, R. C. Thompson, D. C. Rucker, A. L. Simpson and M. I. Miga, "Model-based correction of tissue compression for tracked ultrasound in soft tissue image-guided surgery", Ultrasound Med. Biol., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 788-803, 2014.
18.
T. S. Pheiffer and M. I. Miga, "Toward a generic real-time compression correction framework for tracked ultrasound", Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1777-1792, 2015.
19.
E. Tagliabue, D. Alba, E. Magnabosco, C. Tenga, I. Peterlík and P. Fiorini, "Position-based modeling of lesion displacement in ultrasound-guided breast biopsy", Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg., vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1329-1339, 2019.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.