Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Speckle Noise Removal Using Spatial and Transform Domain Filters in Ultrasound Images | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Speckle Noise Removal Using Spatial and Transform Domain Filters in Ultrasound Images


Abstract:

Noise in the Ultrasound (US) images creates difficulties in interpreting the actual information in the image. Various studies have been done in this direction to retain u...Show More

Abstract:

Noise in the Ultrasound (US) images creates difficulties in interpreting the actual information in the image. Various studies have been done in this direction to retain useful information from the images. Speckle noise is an important noise type present in ultrasound images in the area of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), active Radar, Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and medicine. The granular pattern of speckle noise is formed due to the simultaneous processing of backscattered signals from dispersed targets. This noise limits the quality and contrast of the obtained images resulting in poor understanding of the underlying facts. This work focuses on the various denoising techniques in spatial and transform domain for speckle noise removal in ultrasound images. The performance evaluation of these techniques was done with metrics like Speckle suppression index (SSI), Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and Structural similarity index measure (SSIM). From the experiments, it is evident that SRAD algorithm in spatial domain really out performed all other filters with better SSI, PSNR and SSIM values.
Date of Conference: 19-20 March 2021
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 03 June 2021
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Coimbatore, India
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Denoising Ultrasound (US) images is one of the most demanding fields in image processing. Different noises like Gaussian, impulse, speckle are intrinsically present in US images, which corrupts the content of the image [1]. Among these, removal of speckle noise is challenging due to its multiplicative nature and estimating the noise distribution unlike Gaussian noise. Denoised medical images helps in increasing the certainty of the disease diagnosis and easily detect the lesions. SAR images that give high resolution pictures of the earth are also contaminated by speckle noise [2]. Eliminating speckle noise increase the accuracy of successive segmentation and classification tasks in these images. Therefore, despeckling is a major task in pre-processing stages of US images before detailed analysis and decision making. Ultrasound is high frequency sound waves, inaudible for humans which operates in the range of 2 MHz to 18 MHz [3]. In medical imaging, ultrasound transducers or probes send ultrasound waves to the body, which penetrates through tissues, and the device constructs the image from the echoed waves. Ultrasound waves is a series of small mechanical pressure waves propagating through the body. Ultrasound medical imaging is an effective, noninvasive and inexpensive imaging modality for obtaining cross section of internal organs [4]. The aim of this paper is to analyze the major denoising filters applicable to ultrasound images and quantitative evaluation between these techniques.

Select All
1.
C. a. Duarte-Salazar, andres E. Castro-Ospina, M. a. Becerra and E. Delgado-Trejos, "Speckle Noise Reduction in Ultrasound Images for Improving the Metrological Evaluation of Biomedical applications: an Overview", IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 15983-15999, 2020.
2.
S. K. Ahmed and S. A. Bamerni, "SAR Image Denoising Based on WB-Filter", Proc. 2020 Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. CSASE 2020, pp. 197-202, 2020.
3.
P. T. A, P.S. Hiremath and S. Badiger, "Speckle Noise Reduction in Medical Ultrasound Images", Intech, vol. 32, pp. 137-144, 2013, [online] Available: https://www.intechopen.com/books/advanced-biometrictechnologies/liveness-detection-in-biometrics.
4.
S. Liu et al., "Deep Learning in Medical Ultrasound Analysis: A Review", Engineering, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 261-275, 2019.
5.
J. W. Woods and J. Biemond, "‘A Model for Radar Images and Its Application to Adaptive Digital Filtering of Multiplicative Noise", IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell, vol. PAMI-6, no. 5, pp. 658-659, 1984.
6.
J. Lee, "by Use of Local Statistics", Analysis, no. 2, pp. 1978-1981, 1980.
7.
Y. Yu, S. T. Acton and S. Member, "Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion", IEEE Trans. Image Process, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1260-1270, 2002.
8.
H. Choi and J. Jeong, "Speckle noise reduction in ultrasound images using SRAD and guided filter", 2018 Int. Work. Adv. Image Technol. IWAIT 2018, pp. 1-4, 2018.
9.
A. Buades, B. Coll and J. M. Morel, "A non-local algorithm for image denoising", Proc. - 2005 IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognition CVPR 2005, vol. II, pp. 60-65, 2005.
10.
L. I. Rudin, S. Osher and E. Fatemi, "Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms", Elsevier Sci. Publ, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 259-268, 1992, [online] Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/016727899290242F%0Apapers3://publication/doi/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F.
11.
K. Dabov, A. Foi and K. Egiazarian, "Video denoising by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering", Eur. Signal Process. Conf, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 145-149, 2007.
12.
S. Sari and T. Shimamura, "Frequency Domain Wiener Filter for Image Denoising: Derivation of a New Power Spectrum Estimation Method", J. Signal Process, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 79-85, 2012.
13.
C. S. Panda and S. Patnaik, "Filtering and performance evaluation for restoration of grayscale image corrupted by salt & pepper noise using low pass filtering schemes", 2009 2nd Int. Conf. Emerg. Trends Eng. Technol. ICETET 2009, pp. 940-945, 2009.
14.
S. Thakral and P. Manhas, "Image processing by using different types of discrete wavelet transform", Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci, vol. 955, pp. 499-507, July 2019.
15.
A. E. Savakis and R. Carbone, "Discrete wavelet transform core for image processing applications", Real-Time Imaging IX, vol. 5671, pp. 142, 2005.
16.
A. Devnani and C. D. Rawat, "Comparative analysis of image quality measures", Proc. - Int. Conf. Glob. Trends Signal Process. Inf. Comput. Commun. ICGTSPICC 2016, pp. 353-357, 2017.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.