Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
Low-Complexity Data Collection Scheme for UAV Sink Nodes in Cellular IoT Networks | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Low-Complexity Data Collection Scheme for UAV Sink Nodes in Cellular IoT Networks


Abstract:

Owing to the nature of battery-operated sensors, the residual energy of their battery should be considered when a sink node collects sensory data from them. If a sink att...Show More

Abstract:

Owing to the nature of battery-operated sensors, the residual energy of their battery should be considered when a sink node collects sensory data from them. If a sink attempts to collect data from a sensor that does not have sufficient residual energy to transmit data, the utilization of wireless communication resources may be degraded. However, requiring a periodic residual energy report of the sensors considerably reduces the energy efficiency of them. Consequently, the sink node must be able to estimate the residual energy of the sensors without additional information exchange before attempting to collect data. To tackle this problem, we propose a data collection scheme for mobile sinks in cellular Internet-of-things (IoT) networks. The scheme consists of two phases. In the first phase, the mobile sink estimates the residual energy of the surrounding sensors. To reduce the complexity, we design a state diagram composed of three states based on the Markov chain of the sensor. The sink node calculates the communicable likelihood of each sensor based on the state diagram and collects data from the sensor with the highest likelihood. In the second phase, a cellular base station (BS) selects the appropriate mobile sink to improve the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) of the signal from a cellular user. Each sink node delivers the bidding price to the BS based on the likelihoods of the sensors. The BS determines an appropriate sink node to allocate resources based on the received bidding prices. Moreover, we show the performance of the proposed method in terms of SINR and IoT network utilization through simulation.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology ( Volume: 70, Issue: 5, May 2021)
Page(s): 4865 - 4879
Date of Publication: 25 March 2021

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The Internet of things (IoT) technology plays a key role in modern wireless communication systems. In addition, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are essential for the realization of IoT and have attracted considerable attention from academia and industry. The IoT technology has been applied to numerous services such as smart city [1], smart agriculture [2], and smart homes [3] using the WSNs. In addition, a cellular-IoT network that utilizes massive machine type communication or narrow-band IoT is attracting attention for building large-scale WSNs [4]--[6]. A WSN consists of numerous sensors in the area of interest to monitor environmental factors such as temperature and humidity. Sensors are power-limited devices powered by batteries for economic and technical reasons. Consequently, the performance improvements of WSNs are limited by the finite lifetime of the sensor. Thus, numerous studies have been conducted to increase the lifetime of the sensor [7]–[10]. Most WSNs transfer the sensory data monitored by the sensor to the sink node through relaying. If the sink node is static, the energy efficiency of sensors is degraded because of problems such as energy holes. The problems make the WSNs unable to collect sensory data [11].

Select All
1.
V. Garcia-Font, C. Garrigues and H. Rifà-Pous, "A comparative study of anomaly detection techniques for smart city wireless sensor networks", Sensors, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1-20, Jun. 2016.
2.
V. Bapat, P. Kale, V. Shinde, N. Deshpande and A. Shaligram, "WSN application for crop protection to divert animal intrusions in the agricultural land", Comput. Electron. Agriculture, vol. 133, pp. 88-96, Jan. 2017.
3.
T. Kim, S. Lee, Y. Kwon, J. Noh, S. Kim and S. Cho, "SELCOM: Selective compression scheme for lightweight nodes in blockchain system", IEEE Access, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 225613-225626, Dec. 2020.
4.
A. Rico-Alvarino et al., "An overview of 3GPP enhancements on machine to machine communications", IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 14-21, Jun. 2016.
5.
R. Ratasuk, N. Mangalvedhe, Y. Zhang, M. Robert and J. P. Koskinen, "Overview of narrowband IoT in LTE Rel-13", Proc. IEEE Conf. Standards Commun. Netw., pp. 1-7, Oct. 2016.
6.
S. K. Sharma and X. Wang, "Toward massive machine type communications in ultra-dense cellular IoT networks: Current issues and machine learning-assisted solutions", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tut., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 426-471, 2020.
7.
J. Tan et al., "An adaptive collection scheme-based matrix completion for data gathering in energy-harvesting wireless sensor networks", IEEE Access, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 6703-6723, Jan. 2019.
8.
F. A. Aoudia, M. Gautier and O. Berder, "RLMan: An energy manager based on reinforcement learning for energy harvesting wireless sensor networks", IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 408-417, Jun. 2018.
9.
H. Mostafaei, "Energy-efficient algorithm for reliable routing of wireless sensor networks", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 5567-5575, Jul. 2019.
10.
A. R. Ansari and S. Cho, "CHESS-PC: Cluster-HEad selection scheme with power control for public safety networks", IEEE Access, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 51640-51646, Sep. 2018.
11.
J. Wang, Y. Gao, W. Liu, A. K. Sangaiah and H. J. Kim, "Energy efficient routing algorithm with mobile sink support for wireless sensor networks", Sensors, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1-19, Mar. 2019.
12.
S. Rashed and M. Soyturk, "Analyzing the effects of UAV mobility patterns on data collection in wireless sensor networks", Sensors, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1-21, Feb. 2017.
13.
C. Konstantopoulos, N. Vathis, G. Pantziou and D. Gavalas, "Employing mobile elements for delay-constrained data gathering in WSNs" in Elsevier Comput. Netw., vol. 135, pp. 108-131, Apr. 2018.
14.
Y. Zeng and R. Zhang, "Energy-efficient UAV communication with trajectory optimization", IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 3747-3760, Jun. 2017.
15.
G. Xie and F. Pan, "Cluster-based routing for the mobile sink in wireless sensor networks with obstacles", IEEE Access, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2019-2028, Apr. 2016.
16.
O. Bushnaq, A. Celik, H. ElSawy, M. Alouini and T. Al-Naffouri, "Aeronautical data aggregation and field estimation in IoT networks: Hovering and traveling time dilemma of UAVs", IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 4620-4635, Oct. 2019.
17.
J. Li et al., "Joint optimization on trajectory altitude velocity and link scheduling for minimum mission time in UAV-Aided data collection", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1464-1475, Feb. 2020.
18.
Z. Wang, R. Liu, Q. Liu, J. Thompson and M. Kadoch, "Energy-efficient data collection and device positioning in UAV-Assisted IoT", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1122-1139, Feb. 2020.
19.
C. Zhan, Y. Zeng and R. Zhang, "Energy-efficient data collection in UAV enabled wireless sensor network", IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 328-331, Jun. 2018.
20.
K. Liu et al., "An active mobile charging and data collection scheme for clustered sensor networks", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 5100-5113, May 2019.
21.
H. Dai et al., "CHASE: Charging and scheduling scheme for stochastic event capture in wireless rechargeable sensor networks", IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 44-59, Jan. 2020.
22.
M. Samir, S. Sharafeddine, C. Assi, T. Nguyen and A. Ghrayeb, "UAV trajectory planning for data collection from time-constrained IoT devices", IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 102243-102254, Jan. 2020.
23.
S. Najjar-Ghabel, L. Farzinvash and S. Razavi, "Mobile sink-based data gathering in wireless sensor networks with obstacles using artificial intelligence algorithms", Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 106, Sep. 2020.
24.
W. Wen, S. Zhao, C. Shang and C. Chang, "EAPC: Energy-aware path construction for data collection using mobile sink in wireless sensor networks", IEEE Sensors J., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 890-901, Jan. 2018.
25.
M. Ghorbel, D. Rodríguez-Duarte, H. Ghazzai, M. Hossain and H. Menouar, "Joint position and travel path optimization for energy efficient wireless data gathering using unmanned aerial vehicles", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 2165-2175, Mar. 2019.
26.
Y. Wang and K. Chen, "Efficient path planning for a mobile sink to reliably gather data from sensors with diverse sensing rates and limited buffers", IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1527-1540, Jul. 2019.
27.
K. Li, W. Ni, E. Tovar and A. Jamalipour, "On-board deep q-network for UAV-assisted online power transfer and data collection", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 12215-12226, Dec. 2019.
28.
A. Pang, F. Chao, H. Zhou and J. Zhang, "The method of data collection based on multiple mobile nodes for wireless sensor network", IEEE Access, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 14704-14713, Jan. 2020.
29.
X. Li, G. Zhu, Y. Gong and K. Huang, "Wirelessly powered data aggregation for IoT via over-the-air function computation: Beamforming and power control", IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 3437-3452, Jul. 2019.
30.
Y. Zhang, S. He and J. Chen, "Near optimal data gathering in rechargeable sensor networks with a mobile sink", IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1718-1729, Jun. 2017.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.