Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Exponential Contingency Explosion: Implications for Artificial General Intelligence | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Exponential Contingency Explosion: Implications for Artificial General Intelligence


Abstract:

The failure of complex artificial intelligence (AI) systems seems ubiquitous. To provide a model to describe these shortcomings, we define complexity in terms of a system...Show More

Abstract:

The failure of complex artificial intelligence (AI) systems seems ubiquitous. To provide a model to describe these shortcomings, we define complexity in terms of a system’s sensors and the number of environments or situations in which it performs. The complexity is not looked at in terms of the difficulty of design, but in the final performance of the system as a function of the sensor and environmental count. As the complexity of AI, or any system, increases linearly the contingencies increase exponentially and the number of possible design performances increases as a compound exponential. In this worst case scenario, the exponential increase in contingencies makes the assessment of all contingencies difficult and eventually impossible. As the contingencies grow large, unexpected and undesirable contingencies are all expected to increase in number. This, the worst case scenario, is highly connected, or conjunctive. Contingencies grow linearly with respect to complexity for systems loosely connected, or disjunctive. Mitigation of unexpected outcomes in either case can be accomplished using tools such as design expertise and iterative redesign informed by intelligent testing.
Page(s): 2800 - 2808
Date of Publication: 04 March 2021

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The more complex a system, the greater number of performance contingencies. This growth is a concern requiring serious consideration in the pursuit of artificial general intelligence (AGI) [2], [29], [39]. The analysis herein does not address the goals of AGI research, but rather the difficulty of achieving them. Any effort at achieving AGI will, by necessity, be complex. Our analysis is applicable to all complex systems including complex artificial intelligence (AI).

Select All
1.
P. Arabshahi et al., "Adaptive routing in wireless communication networks using swarm intelligence", Proc. 19th AIAA Int. Commun. Satellite Syst. Conf., pp. 1-9, Apr. 2001.
2.
M. Baroni et al., CommAI: Evaluating the first steps towards a useful general AI, 2017, [online] Available: http://arXiv:1701.08954.
3.
C. Baylis, R. J. Marks and L. Cohen, Pareto Optimization of Radar Receiver Low-Noise Amplifier Source Impedance for Low Noise and High Gain, Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge Univ. Press, Nov. 2015.
4.
J. C. Bezdek, "Fuzzy models—What are they and why?", IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-6, Feb. 1993.
5.
E. Bonabeau, M. Dorigo, G. Theraulaz and G. Theraulaz, Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems, New York, NY, USA:Oxford Univ. Press, 1999.
6.
J. M. Carlson and J. Doyle, "Highly optimized tolerance: Robustness and design in complex systems", Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 84, no. 11, pp. 2529-2532, Mar. 2000.
7.
Y. Censor, "Pareto optimality in multiobjective problems", Appl. Math. Optim., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 41-59, 1977.
8.
W. E. Combs and J. E. Andrews, "Combinatorial rule explosion eliminated by a fuzzy rule configuration", IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-11, Feb. 1988.
9.
M. Danishvar, A. Mousavi and P. Broomhead, "EventiC: A real-time unbiased event-based learning technique for complex systems", IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1649-1662, May 2020.
10.
W. A. Dembski, No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased Without Intelligence, New York, NY, USA:Rowman Littlefield, 2006.
11.
W. A. Dembski and R. J. Marks, "Conservation of information in search: Measuring the cost of success", IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A Syst. Humans, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1051-1061, Sep. 2009.
12.
W. A. Dembski and R. J. Marks, "Bernoulli’s principle of insufficient reason and conservation of information in computer search", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybern., pp. 2647-2652, 2009.
13.
W. A. Dembski and R. J. Marks, "The search for a search: Measuring the information cost of higher level search", J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Informat., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 475-486, 2010.
14.
B. Dixon, Star Self-Driving Truck Firm Shuts Down; AI Not Safe Enough Soon Enough, Seattle, WA, USA:Mind Matters News, Mar. 2020.
15.
M. Dorigo, M. Birattari and T. Stutzle, "Ant colony optimization", IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 28-39, Nov. 2006.
16.
K. Dorst and N. Cross, "Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution", Design Stud., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 425-437, Sep. 2001.
17.
W. Ewert, R. J. Marks, B. B. Thompson and A. Yu, "Evolutionary inversion of swarm emergence using disjunctive combs control", IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1063-1076, Sep. 2013.
18.
R. Gonzales, Feds Say Self-Driving Uber SUV Did Not Recognize Jaywalking Pedestrian in Fatal Crash, Washington, DC, USA:NPR, Nov. 2019, [online] Available: http://npr.org.
19.
K. Finley, Did a Computer Bug Help Deep Blue Beat Kasparov?, Sep. 2012, [online] Available: http://Wired.com.
20.
H. Gao, C. Ye, W. Lin and J. Qiu, "Complex workpiece positioning system with nonrigid registration method for 6-DoFs automatic spray painting robot", IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., Mar. 2020.
21.
I. A. Gravagne and R. J. Marks, "Emergent Behaviors of Protector Refugee and Aggressor Swarm", IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 471-476, Apr. 2007.
22.
P. Haas, The Real Reason to Be Afraid of Artificial Intelligence TEDxDirigo, Dec. 2017, [online] Available: http://youtu.be/TRzBk_KuIaM.
23.
Y.-C. Ho, Q.-C. Zhao and D. L. Pepyne, "The no free lunch theorems: Complexity and security", IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 783-793, May 2003.
24.
I. Kassabalidis, M. A. El-Sharkawi, R. J. Marks, P. Arabshahi and A. A. Gray, "Swarm intelligence for routing in communication networks", Proc. IEEE Global Telecommun. Conf. (Globecom), pp. 3613-3617, 2001.
25.
I. Kassabalidis, M. A. El-Sharkawi, R. J. Marks, P. Arabshahi and A. A. Gray , "Adaptive-SDR: Adaptive swarm-based distributed routing", Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Neural Netw. World Congr. Comput. Intell., pp. 2878-2883, May 2002.
26.
J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, "Particle swarm optimization", Proc. Int. Conf. Neural Netw. (ICNN), vol. 4, pp. 1942-1948, 1995.
27.
L. Kong, M. K. Khan, F. Wu, G. Chen and P. Zeng, "Millimeter-wave wireless communications for IoT-cloud supported autonomous vehicles: Overview design and challenges", IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 62-68, Jan. 2017.
28.
L. M. Leemis, Reliability: Probabilistic Models and Statistical Methods, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA:Prentice-Hall, 1995.
29.
A. Lieto, M. Bhatt, A. Oltramari and D. Vernon, "The role of cognitive architectures in general artificial intelligence", Cogn. Syst. Res., vol. 48, pp. 1-3, May 2018.
30.
S. Lloyd, "Measures of complexity: A nonexhaustive list", IEEE Control Syst. Mag., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 7-8, Aug. 2001.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.