Model Identification Based on Sparse or Non-Uniform Datasets using Tensor Product Function Manipulations | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Model Identification Based on Sparse or Non-Uniform Datasets using Tensor Product Function Manipulations


Abstract:

This paper presents an approach for creating tensor product (TP) models based on sparse or non-uniform samples representing arbitrary datasets, and for manipulating the r...Show More

Abstract:

This paper presents an approach for creating tensor product (TP) models based on sparse or non-uniform samples representing arbitrary datasets, and for manipulating the resulting TP structure to further identify the models behind the datasets. Given the usefulness of TP models in merging together closed algebraic formulae and tensor representations, it is argued that the proposed approach can be applied towards understanding the underlying complexity of a given dataset, while iteratively arriving at a model for the process that generated it. The key idea behind the approach is demonstrated using a dataset on sound pressure levels generated by different-sized airfoils in a wind tunnel.
Date of Conference: 19-19 November 2020
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 27 January 2021
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Győr, Hungary
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Tensor Product (TP) models can be seen as discrete sampling-based structures that are transformed into a unique representation (consisting of tensor-matrix products) based on higher-order singular value decomposition (HOSVD) [1] . TP models represent a natural connection between matrix and tensor-algbraic concepts such as rank or dimensionality reduction on the one hand, and closed-form equations on the other. This property of TP models has made them a suitable representation in a wide variety of application areas where modeling accuracy and complexity reduction are equally important. [2] , [3] , [4] .

Select All
1.
L. D. Lathauwer, B. D. Moor and J. Vandewalle, "A Multi Linear Singular Value Decomposition", SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1253-1278, 2000.
2.
P. Baranyi et al., TP-model Transformation-based-control Design Frameworks, Springer, 2016.
3.
P. Baranyi, Y. Yam and P. Varlaki, "Tensor product model transformation in polytopic model-based control ser" in Automation and Control Engineering, Taylor & Francis Group, 2013.
4.
L. Szeidl and P. Várlaki, "Hosvd based canonical form for polytopic models of dynamic systems", Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 52-60, 2009.
5.
M. Ishteva, L. Lathauwer, P. Absil and S. van Huffel, "Dimensionality Reduction for Higher-Order Tensors: Algorithms and Applications", International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 337-343, 2008.
6.
L. De Lathauwer, B. De Moor and J. Vandewalle, "On the best rank-1 and rank-(r 1 r 2… rn) approximation of higher-order tensors", SIAM journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1324-1342, 2000.
7.
T. F. Brooks, D. S. Pope and M. A. Marcolini, "Airfoil self-noise and prediction", Technical Report NASA RP-1218, 1989.
8.
R. Lopez, E. Balsa-Canto and E. Oñate, "Neural networks for variational problems in engineering", International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 1341-1360, 2008.
9.
K. Lau, "A neural networks approach to aerofoil noise prediction", MSc Thesis, 2009.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.