Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
An Efficient and Scalable Simulation Model for Autonomous Vehicles With Economical Hardware | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

An Efficient and Scalable Simulation Model for Autonomous Vehicles With Economical Hardware


Abstract:

Autonomous vehicles rely on sophisticated hardware and software technologies for acquiring holistic awareness of their immediate surroundings. Deep learning methods have ...Show More

First Page of the Article

Abstract:

Autonomous vehicles rely on sophisticated hardware and software technologies for acquiring holistic awareness of their immediate surroundings. Deep learning methods have effectively equipped modern self-driving cars with high levels of such awareness. However, their application requires high-end computational hardware, which makes utilization infeasible for the legacy vehicles that constitute most of today’s automotive industry. Hence, it becomes inherently challenging to achieve high performance while at the same time maintaining adequate computational complexity. In this paper, a monocular vision and scalar sensor-based model car is designed and implemented to accomplish autonomous driving on a specified track by employing a lightweight deep learning model. It can identify various traffic signs based on a vision sensor as well as avoid obstacles by using an ultrasonic sensor. The developed car utilizes a single Raspberry Pi as its computational unit. In addition, our work investigates the behavior of economical hardware used to deploy deep learning models. In particular, we herein propose a novel, computationally efficient, and cost-effective approach. The designed system can serve as a platform to facilitate the development of economical technologies for autonomous vehicles that can be used as part of intelligent transportation or advanced driver assistance systems. The experimental results indicate that this model can achieve real-time response on a resource-constrained device without significant overheads, thus making it a suitable candidate for autonomous driving in current intelligent transportation systems.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems ( Volume: 22, Issue: 3, March 2021)
Page(s): 1718 - 1732
Date of Publication: 15 May 2020

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

First Page of the Article

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

A vehicle capable of perceiving its surrounding environment and driving by itself safely without human intervention is known as an autonomous vehicle (also referred to as self-driving, driverless, or robotic vehicle) [1], [2]. Autonomous cars are constantly making headline news over the last few years. Different manufacturing companies and startups are targeting to develop safer, more responsive, and reliable cars for consumers of the next generation [3]. There is a growing competition among the biggest car manufacturing companies, each making their own version of a self-driving car.

Select All
1.
S. K. Gehrig and F. J. Stein, "Dead reckoning and cartography using stereo vision for an autonomous car", Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. Hum. Environ. Friendly Robots High Intell. Emotional Quotients, pp. 1507-1512, Oct. 1999.
2.
S. Thrun, "Toward robotic cars", Commun. ACM, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 99-106, Apr. 2010.
3.
B. Schoettle and M. Sivak, "A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US the UK and Australia", 2014.
4.
Baidu Just Made Its 100th Autonomous Bus Ahead of Commercial Launch in China, Burbank, CA, USA, Jul. 2018.
5.
H. Woo et al., "Lane-change detection based on vehicle-trajectory prediction", IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1109-1116, Apr. 2017.
6.
K. Jo and M. Sunwoo, "Generation of a precise roadway map for autonomous cars", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 925-937, Jun. 2014.
7.
M. Althoff and A. Mergel, "Comparison of Markov chain abstraction and Monte Carlo simulation for the safety assessment of autonomous cars", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1237-1247, Dec. 2011.
8.
Q. Li, L. Chen, M. Li, S.-L. Shaw and A. Nuchter, "A sensor-fusion drivable-region and lane-detection system for autonomous vehicle navigation in challenging road scenarios", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 540-555, Feb. 2014.
9.
A. Borkar, M. Hayes and M. T. Smith, "A novel lane detection system with efficient ground truth generation", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 365-374, Mar. 2012.
10.
H. Yoo, U. Yang and K. Sohn, "Gradient-enhancing conversion for illumination-robust lane detection", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1083-1094, Sep. 2013.
11.
S. Sivaraman and M. M. Trivedi, "Integrated lane and vehicle detection localization and tracking: A synergistic approach", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 906-917, Jun. 2013.
12.
M. Buehler, K. Iagnemma and S. Singh, The DARPA Urban Challenge: Autonomous Vehicles in City Traffic, Berlin, Germany:Springer-Verlag, vol. 56, 2009.
13.
J. Levinson et al., "Towards fully autonomous driving: Systems and algorithms", Proc. IEEE Intell. Vehicles Symp. (IV), pp. 163-168, Jun. 2011.
14.
S. Thrun et al., "Stanley: The robot that won the DARPA grand challenge", J. Field Robot., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 661-692, 2006.
15.
C.-Y. Lee, C.-T. Lin, C.-T. Hong and M.-T. Su, "Smoke detection using spatial and temporal analyses", Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 4749-4770, 2012.
16.
W. J. Schakel, B. van Arem and B. D. Netten, "Effects of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic flow stability", Proc. 13th Int. IEEE Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst., pp. 759-764, Sep. 2010.
17.
B. van Arem, C. J. G. van Driel and R. Visser, "The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 429-436, Dec. 2006.
18.
X. Chen et al., "3D object proposals for accurate object class detection", Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., pp. 424-432, 2015.
19.
R. Guidolini, C. Badue, M. Berger, L. D. P. Veronese and A. F. De Souza, "A simple yet effective obstacle avoider for the IARA autonomous car", Proc. IEEE 19th Int. Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst. (ITSC), pp. 1914-1919, Nov. 2016.
20.
J. Choi et al., "Environment-detection-and-mapping algorithm for autonomous driving in rural or off-road environment", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 974-982, Jun. 2012.
21.
J. Leonard et al., "A perception-driven autonomous urban vehicle", J. Field Robot., vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 727-774, 2008.
22.
N. Kalra and S. M. Paddock, "Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability?", Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., vol. 94, pp. 182-193, Dec. 2016.
23.
A. Petrovskaya and S. Thrun, "Model based vehicle detection and tracking for autonomous urban driving", Auto. Robots, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 123-139, Apr. 2009.
24.
A. S. Razavian, H. Azizpour, J. Sullivan and S. Carlsson, "CNN features off-the-shelf: An astounding baseline for recognition", Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. Workshops, pp. 806-813, Jun. 2014.
25.
S. Khan, K. Muhammad, S. Mumtaz, S. W. Baik and V. H. C. de Albuquerque, "Energy-efficient deep CNN for smoke detection in foggy IoT environment", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 9237-9245, Dec. 2019.
26.
Y. Kim, "Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification", arXiv:1408.5882, 2014, [online] Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.5882.
27.
O. Abdel-Hamid, A.-R. Mohamed, H. Jiang, L. Deng, G. Penn and D. Yu, "Convolutional neural networks for speech recognition", IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio Speech Language Process., vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1533-1545, Oct. 2014.
28.
Y. Wu et al., "Google’s neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation", arXiv:1609.08144, 2016, [online] Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.08144.
29.
M. Defferrard, X. Bresson and P. Vandergheynst, "Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering", Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., pp. 3844-3852, 2016.
30.
Y. S. Wong, N. K. Lee and N. Omar, "GMFR-CNN: An integration of gapped motif feature representation and deep learning approach for enhancer prediction", Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Comput. Syst.-Biol. Bioinf. (CSBio), pp. 41-47, 2016.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.