Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
A Proprioceptive Bellows (PB) Actuator With Position Feedback and Force Estimation | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

A Proprioceptive Bellows (PB) Actuator With Position Feedback and Force Estimation


Abstract:

Soft robot is known for great safety in human-centered environments due to its inherent compliance. However, the compliance resulting from the soft continuum structure an...Show More

Abstract:

Soft robot is known for great safety in human-centered environments due to its inherent compliance. However, the compliance resulting from the soft continuum structure and viscoelastic material also induces challenges for sensing and control of soft robots. In this letter, we propose a proprioceptive soft actuator design approach based on 3D printed conductive material and 3D printed deformable structure, such as bellows. The conductive bellow exhibits effective resistance change and structural deformation, thus provides a promising solution for the challenge of deformable soft robots that need integrated actuation and sensing. The proposed proprioceptive bellow actuator (PB actuator) achieves effective position feedback and real-time output force estimation. Using a dedicated control logic of the pressure controller, the PB actuator can not only provide anticipated motion but also estimate the interactive force based on real-time position sensing and input pressure. The design, fabrication, modeling, control, and experimental validation of our proposed PB actuator are discussed in detail in this letter. The parameters of PB actuator are highly customizable depending on the intended applications. Based on the proposed PB actuator, two specialized grippers, T and Y gripper, are designed and prototyped to demonstrate the grasping force estimation capability. The proposed proprioceptive soft robotic approach provides a promising solution to design behavior steerable soft robots.
Published in: IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters ( Volume: 5, Issue: 2, April 2020)
Page(s): 1867 - 1874
Date of Publication: 28 January 2020

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Human-centered environment is one of the most important application scenarios for robot [1]. Close cooperation between human beings and robots significantly enhances the working efficiency. Robots can also serve as the companion and assistant to humans as part of human life. Under human-centered conditions, the vital considerations for robot design are safety, adaptability, task-worthiness, and affordability compared to robots focused on force, speed and accuracy of traditional industrial robots [2]. Soft robots with inherent compliance provide an effective solution for safe robot-environment and robot-human interaction [3], [4]. Existing works have demonstrated potential of soft robot to solve challenges in areas such as human-centered grasping [5], [6], manipulation [7], [8], rehabilitation [9], [10], medical applications [11], [12], and novel robotic applications [13], [14].

Select All
1.
M. A Goodrich, "Schultz A C. human–robot interaction: A survey", Found. Trends Human–Comput. Interact., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 203-275, 2008.
2.
K. Severinson-Eklundh, A. Green and H. Hüttenrauch, "Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot", Robot. Auton. Syst., vol. 42, no. 3-4, pp. 223-234, 2003.
3.
D. Rus and M. T. Tolley, "Design fabrication and control of soft robots[J]", Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 467-75, 2015.
4.
S. Kim, C. Laschi and B. Trimmer, "Soft robotics: A bioinspired evolution in robotics", Trends Biotechnol., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 287-294, 2013.
5.
S. Hirose and Y. Umetani, "The development of soft gripper for the versatile robot hand", Mechanism Mach. Theory, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 351-359, 1978.
6.
J. Zhou, S. Chen and Z. Wang, "A soft robotic gripper with enhanced object adaptation and grasping reliability", IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 2287-2293, Oct. 2017.
7.
J. Zhou, J. Yi, X. Chen, Z. Liu and Z. Wang, "BCL-13: A 13-DOF Soft robotic hand for dexterous grasping and in-hand manipulation", IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3379-3386, Oct. 2018.
8.
J. Zhou et al., "A soft-robotic approach to anthropomorphic robotic hand dexterity", IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 101483-101495, 2019.
9.
P. Polygerinos, Z. Wang, K. C. Galloway, R. J. Wood and C. J. Walsh, "Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation", Robot. Auton. Syst., vol. 73, pp. 135-143, 2015.
10.
M. Grimmer et al., "Mobility related physical and functional losses due to aging and disease-a motivation for lower limb exoskeletons", J. Neuroengineering Rehabil., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 12-33, 2019.
11.
T. Ranzani et al., "A bioinspired soft manipulator for minimally invasive surgery", Bioinspiration Biomimet., vol. 10, no. 3, 2015.
12.
T. Ranzani, M. Cianchetti, G. Gerboni, I. D. Falco and A. Menciassi, "A soft modular manipulator for minimally invasive surgery: Design and characterization of a single module", IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 187-200, Feb. 2016.
13.
F. Ilievski, A. D. Mazzeo, R. F. Shepherd, X. Chen and G. M. Whitesides, "Soft robotics for chemists", Angewandte Chemie Int. Edition, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1890-1895, 2011.
14.
E. W. Hawkes et al., "A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth", Sci. Robot., vol. 2, no. 8, 2017.
15.
T. G. Thuruthel et al., "Soft robot perception using embedded soft sensors and recurrent neural networks", Sci. Robot., vol. 4, no. 26, 2019.
16.
H. Wang, M. Totaro and L. Beccai, "Toward perceptive soft robots: Progress and challenges", Adv. Sci., vol. 5, no. 9, 2018.
17.
X. Chen, J. Yi, J. Li, J. Zhou and Z. Wang, "Soft-actuator-based robotic joint for safe and forceful interaction with controllable impact response", IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3505-3512, Oct. 2018.
18.
K. Kure et al., "Flexible displacement sensor using injected conductive paste", Sensors Actuators A: Phys., vol. 143, no. 2, pp. 272-278, 2008.
19.
S. Sareh et al., "Macrobend optical sensing for pose measurement in soft robot arms", Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 24, no. 12, 2015.
20.
M. Cianchetti, F. Renda, A. Licofonte and C. Laschi, "Sensorization of continuum soft robots for reconstructing their spatial configuration", Proc. 2012 4th IEEE RAS EMBS Int. Conf. Biomed. Robot. Biomechatronics (BioRob), pp. 634-639, 2012.
21.
S. Ozel et al., "A precise embedded curvature sensor module for soft-bodied robots", Sensors Actuators A: Phys., vol. 236, pp. 349-356, 2015.
22.
T. Helps and J. Rossiter, "Proprioceptive flexible fluidic actuators using conductive working fluids", Soft Robot., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 175-189, 2018.
23.
S. Nakamaru et al., "FoamSense: Design of three dimensional soft sensors with porous materials", Proc. 30th Ann. ACM Symp. User Interface Softw. Technol., pp. 437-447, 2017.
24.
B. Shih et al., "Design considerations for 3D printed soft multimaterial resistive sensors for soft robotics", Front. Robot. AI, vol. 6, pp. 18-30, 2019.
25.
S. J. Leigh et al., "A simple low-cost conductive composite material for 3D printing of electronic sensors", PloS one, vol. 7, no. 11, 2012.
26.
J. T. Muth et al., "Embedded 3D printing of strain sensors within highly stretchable elastomers", Adv. Mater., vol. 26, no. 36, pp. 6307-6312, 2014.
27.
M. Yao, C. H. Belke, H. Cui and J. Paik, "A reconfiguration strategy for modular robots using origami folding", Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 73-89, 2019.
28.
A. Firouzeh and J. Paik, "Robogami: A fully integrated low-profile robotic origami", J. Mechanisms Robot., vol. 7, no. 2, 2015.
29.
J. Yi et al., "Customizable three-dimensional-printed origami soft robotic joint with effective behavior shaping for safe interactions", IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 114-123, Feb. 2019.
30.
S. Liu et al., "Deformation of the Miura-Ori patterned sheet", Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 99, pp. 130-142, 2015.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.