Abstract:
This paper provides methodology for fully automated model-based image segmentation. All information necessary to perform image segmentation is automatically derived from ...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
This paper provides methodology for fully automated model-based image segmentation. All information necessary to perform image segmentation is automatically derived from a training set that is presented in a form of segmentation examples. The training set is used to construct two models representing the objects-shape model and border appearance model. A two-step approach to image segmentation is reported. In the first step, an approximate location of the object of interest is determined. In the second step, accurate border segmentation is performed. The shape-variant Hough transform method was developed that provides robust object localization automatically. It finds objects of arbitrary shape, rotation, or scaling and can handle object variability. The border appearance model was developed to automatically design cost functions that can be used in the segmentation criteria of edge-based segmentation methods. The authors' method was tested in five different segmentation tasks that included 489 objects to be segmented. The final segmentation was compared to manually defined borders with good results [rms errors in pixels: 1.2 (cerebellum), 1.1 (corpus callosum), 1.5 (vertebrae), 1.4 (epicardial), and 1.6 (endocardial) borders]. Two major problems of the state-of-the-art edge-based image segmentation algorithms were addressed: strong dependency on a close-to-target initialization, and necessity for manual redesign of segmentation criteria whenever new segmentation problem is encountered.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging ( Volume: 19, Issue: 10, October 2000)
DOI: 10.1109/42.887613
References is not available for this document.
Select All
1.
R. M. Haralick and L. G. Shapiro, "Image segmentation techniques", Comp.Vision Graphics and Image Proc., vol. 29, pp. 100-132, 1985.
2.
"Analysis of some region growing operators for image segmentation" in Advances in Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Amsterdam:North Holland, pp. 204-208, 1986.
3.
M. Sonka, V. Hlavac and R. Boyle, Image Processing Analysis and Machine Vision, CA, Pacific Grove:PWS, 1998.
4.
M. Kass, A. Witkin and D. Terzopoulos, "Snakes: Active contour models", Int. J. Comput. Vision, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 321-331, 1987.
5.
R. Bellmann, Dynamic Programming, NJ, Princeton:Princeton Univ. Press, 1957.
6.
L. S. Pontriagin, Optimal Control and Differential Games: Collection of Papers, RI, Providence:Amer. Math. Soc., 1990.
7.
T. F. Cootes, A. Hill, C. J. Taylor and J. Haslam, "Use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images", Image Vision Comput., vol. 12, pp. 355-365, 1994.
8.
A. Falcao, J. Udupa, S. Samarasekera, S. Sharma, B. Hirsh and R. Lotufo, User-steered image segmentation paradigm: Live wire and live lane, 1995.
9.
A. Falcao and J. Udupa, Segmentation of 3-D objects using live wire, 1997.
10.
E. Mortensen, B. Morse, W. Barrett and J. Udupa, "Adaptive boundary detection using live-wire two-dimensional dynamic programming" in Computers in Cardiology, CA, Los Alamitos:IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, pp. 635-638, 1992.
11.
W. A. Barrett and E. N. Mortensen, "Fast accurate and reproducible live-wire boundary extraction" in Visualization in Biomedical Computing, Germany, Berlin:Springer Verlag, pp. 183-192, 1996.
12.
"Multiscale medial analysis of medical images" in Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Germany, Berlin:Springer-Verlag, pp. 112-131, 1993.
13.
S. M. Pizer, D. H. Eberly, B. S. Morse and D. S. Fritsch, "Zoom invariant vision of figural shape: The mathematics of cores", Comput. Vision Image Understanding, vol. 69, pp. 55-71, 1998.
14.
T. Cootes, G. Edwards and C. Taylor, "Active appearance models", Proc. 5th Eur. Conf. Computer Vision, vol. 2, pp. 484-498, 1998.
15.
T. Cootes and C. J. Taylor, Statistical models of appearance for computer vision, 1999.
16.
"Comparing active shape models with active appearance models", Br. Machine Vision Conf., vol. 1, pp. 173-182, 1999.
17.
A. X. Falcao, J. K. Udupa, S. Samarasekera, S. Sharma, B. E. Hirsch and R. A. Lotufo, User-steered image segmentation paradigms: Live wire and live lane, 1995.
18.
J. K. Udupa, S. Samarasekera and W. A. Barrett, "Boundary detection via dynamic programming", Visualization in Biomedical Computing Proc. SPIE, vol. 1808, pp. 33-39, 1992.
19.
B. S. Morse, W. A. Barrett, J. K. Udupa and R. P. Burton, Trainable optimal boundary finding using two-dimensional dynamic programming, 1991.
20.
T. F. Cootes, D. H. Cooper, C. J. Taylor and J. Graham, "Trainable method of parametric shape description", Image Vision Comput., vol. 10, no. 5, 1992.
21.
M. Brejl and M. Sonka, "Medical image segmentation automated design of border detection criteria from examples", J. Electron. Imag., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 54-64, Jan. 1999.
22.
P. V. C. Hough, A method and means for recognizing complex patterns, 1962.
23.
D. H. Ballard, "Generalizing the Hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes", Pattern Recogn., vol. 13, pp. 111-122, 1981.
24.
C. Goodall, "Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape", J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 285-339, 1991.
25.
F. L. Bookstein, Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data, U.K., Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991.
26.
J. Kent, "The complex bingham distribution and shape analysis", J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, vol. 56, pp. 285-299, 1994.
27.
B. K. P. Horn, "Closed form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions", J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A, vol. 4, pp. 629-642, 1987.
28.
T. F. Cootes, C. J. Taylor, D. H. Cooper and J. Graham, "Active shape models-their training and application", Comput. Vision Image Understanding, vol. 61, pp. 38-59, 1995.
29.
N. Duta and M. Sonka, "Segmentation and interpretation of MR brain images: An improved active shape model", IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 17, pp. 1049-1062, Dec. 1998.
30.
J. C. Bezdek, Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms, New York:Plenum, 1981.