Replication of Smart-City Internet of Things Assets in a Municipal Deployment | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Replication of Smart-City Internet of Things Assets in a Municipal Deployment


Abstract:

Recent efforts to integrate Internet of Things (IoT) technologies into Smart City constructs have proven successful through proof-of-concept deployments in multiple citie...Show More

Abstract:

Recent efforts to integrate Internet of Things (IoT) technologies into Smart City constructs have proven successful through proof-of-concept deployments in multiple cities. To facilitate additional deployments, standardization, and dissemination of best practices for these technologies is critical. To that effort, this paper seeks to establish a framework in a set of IoT hardware, software, and wireless radio components that are flexible to address several use cases and easily replicable to new deployments. Moreover, the framework aims to be standards-based and to use best practices for cybersecurity to maintain security and privacy. The framework is developed, deployed, and tested through three subprojects in different domains and a live testbed housed by a municipal government, collecting over 160 million distinct sensor records from eight physical locations over a period of eight months. Additionally, the framework is replicated to a separate jurisdiction to prove ease of replicability. This paper identifies common barriers to IoT adoption and replication, both technological and organizational, and enumerates the approaches that were taken to overcome those barriers in these projects.
Published in: IEEE Internet of Things Journal ( Volume: 6, Issue: 4, August 2019)
Page(s): 6715 - 6724
Date of Publication: 17 April 2019

ISSN Information:

PubMed ID: 31579282

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The application of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies to the public space has become an important and very impactful area of research. Smart City is the concept of using sensing and data collection in municipal environments, and incorporates many IoT technologies. Many cities, communities, and municipal governments are looking to Smart-City technology as the next evolution of e-governance, enabling new interactions with the public or reducing overhead of existing policies. Municipal governments are also striving to take advantage of the advances of Information and Communication Technology, but specific implementation of the Smart City technology is often slowed down by the lack of generally accepted best practices and broadly deployed standard-based solutions, as well as by the necessary due processes for procurement and long budget cycles.

Select All
1.
M. J. Burns and S. Rhee, "Facilitation of Smart City and community technology convergence", Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop Sci. Smart City Oper. Platforms Eng. (SCOPE), pp. 36-41, 2018.
2.
SmartAmerica Challenge: Harnessing the Power of the Internet of Things, Jun. 2014, [online] Available: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2014/06/10/smartamerica-challenge-harnessing-power-internet-things.
3.
Smart America, Jun. 2014, [online] Available: http://smartamerica.org/.
4.
Global City Team Challenge, Jun. 2018, [online] Available: https://pages.nist.gov/GCTC/.
5.
Smart City Framework—International Technical Working Group on IoT-Enabled Smart City Framework, Jun. 2018, [online] Available: https://pages.nist.gov/GCTC/.
6.
E. R. Griffor, C. Greer, D. A. Wollman and M. J. Burns, "Framework for cyber-physical systems: Volume 1 overview", 2017.
7.
A. Abdulkadir et al., "Effects of hardware heterogeneity on the performance of SVM Alzheimer’s disease classifier", Neuroimage, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 785-792, 2011.
8.
Z. Ou, H. Zhuang, J. K. Nurminen, A. Ylä-Jääski and P. Hui, "Exploiting hardware heterogeneity within the same instance type of Amazon EC2", Proc. HotCloud, 2012, [online] Available: https://www.usenix.org/conference/hotcloud12/workshop-program/presentation/ou.
9.
M. Denscombe, The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research, Maidenhead, U.K.:McGraw Hill, 2010.
10.
R. S. Kaplan, "Innovation action research: Creating new management theory and practice", J. Manag. Account. Res., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 89-118, 1998.
11.
R. Katz and T. J. Allen, "Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance tenure and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups", R D Manag., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 7-20, 1982.
12.
J. C. Zuniga and B. Ponsard, "SIGFOX system description", Proc. Internet Eng. Task Force (IETF) Meetings, Nov. 2016.
13.
Lorawan Specification, Beaverton, OR, USA:LoRa Alliance, 2015.
14.
U. Hunkeler, H. L. Truong and A. Stanford-Clark, "MQTT-S—A publish/subscribe protocol for wireless sensor networks", Proc. IEEE 3rd Int. Conf. Commun. Syst. Softw. Middleware Workshops (COMSWARE), pp. 791-798, 2008.
15.
Node-Red, Apr. 2019, [online] Available: https://nodered.org/.
16.
D. Crockford, The application/json media type for javascript object notation (JSON), Fremont, CA, USA, 2006.
17.
K. Benson et al., "SCALE: Safe community awareness and alerting leveraging the Internet of Things", IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 27-34, Dec. 2015.
18.
P. Beckman et al., "Waggle: An open sensor platform for edge computing", Proc. IEEE SENSORS, pp. 1-3, 2016.
19.
C. E. Catlett, P. H. Beckman, R. Sankaran and K. K. Galvin, "Array of things: A scientific research instrument in the public way: platform design and early lessons learned", Proc. ACM 2nd Int. Workshop Sci. Smart City Oper. Platforms Eng., pp. 26-33, 2017.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.