Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
Opportunistic Ambient Backscatter Communication in RF-Powered Cognitive Radio Networks | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Opportunistic Ambient Backscatter Communication in RF-Powered Cognitive Radio Networks


Abstract:

In the present contribution, we propose a novel opportunistic ambient backscatter communication (ABC) framework for radio frequency (RF)-powered cognitive radio (CR) netw...Show More

Abstract:

In the present contribution, we propose a novel opportunistic ambient backscatter communication (ABC) framework for radio frequency (RF)-powered cognitive radio (CR) networks. This framework considers opportunistic spectrum sensing (SS) integrated with ABC and harvest-then-transmit (HTT) operation strategies. Novel analytic expressions are derived for the average throughput, the average energy consumption and the energy efficiency (EE) in the considered set up. These expressions are represented in closed-form and have a tractable algebraic representation which renders them convenient to handle both analytically and numerically. In addition, we formulate an optimization problem to maximize the EE of the CR system operating in mixed ABC-and HTT-modes, for a given set of constraints, including primary interference and imperfect SS constraints. Capitalizing on this, we determine the optimal set of parameters which in turn comprise the optimal detection threshold, the optimal degree of trade-off between the CR system operating in the ABC-and HTT-modes and the optimal data transmission time. Extensive results from respective computer simulations are also presented for corroborating the corresponding analytic results and to demonstrate the performance gain of the proposed model in terms of EE.
Page(s): 413 - 426
Date of Publication: 22 March 2019

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The need for efficient utilization of spectrum resources has become a fundamental requirement in modern wireless networks due to the witnessed spectrum scarcity and the ever-increasing demand for higher data rate applications and Internet services. In this context, an interesting proposal has been the development of cognitive radio (CR) networks [2], which can adapt their transmission parameters according to the characteristics of the communication environment. Cognitive radios have been shown to be efficient in increasing spectrum utilization due to their inherent spectrum sensing (SS) capability [3]. In this regard, dynamic spectrum access (DSA), where the secondary users (SU) can opportunistically access the underutilized frequency bands, is the standard solution for the realization of DSA [4], which is envisioned to be an integral part of future communication systems [5]. In order to realize DSA, three strategies have been proposed, namely the underlay, the overlay and the interweave. In the underlay technique, the SUs coexist with a PU provided that the interference level at the PU remains below a certain threshold [6]. In the overlay paradigm, the SUs would be allowed to share the band with PU by exploiting the knowledge of its message and codebook in order to reduce interference. Finally, in the interweave technique, the SU can only access the licensed spectrum of the PU when it is idle [7].

Select All
1.
R. Kishore, S. Gurugopinath, P. C. Sofotasios, S. Muhaidat and N. Al-Dhahir, "Opportunistic ambient backscatter communication in RF-powered cognitive radio networks", Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf. (WCNC), pp. 1-6, Apr. 2019.
2.
J. Mitola and G. Q. Maguire, "Cognitive radio: Making software radios more personal", IEEE Pers. Commun. Mag., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 13-18, Aug. 1999.
3.
E. Axell, G. Leus, E. G. Larsson and H. V. Poor, "Spectrum sensing for cognitive radio: State-of-the-art and recent advances", IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 101-116, May 2012.
4.
O. Altrad, S. Muhaidat, A. Al-Dweik, A. Shami and P. D. Yoo, "Opportunistic spectrum access in cognitive radio networks under imperfect spectrum sensing", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 920-925, Feb. 2014.
5.
N. U. Hasan et al., "Network selection and channel allocation for spectrum sharing in 5G heterogeneous networks", IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 980-992, 2016.
6.
M. Usman and I. Koo, "Access strategy for hybrid underlay-overlay cognitive radios with energy harvesting", IEEE Sensors J., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 3164-3173, Sep. 2014.
7.
A. Goldsmith, S. A. Jafar, I. Maric and S. Srinivasa, "Breaking spectrum gridlock with cognitive radios: An information theoretic perspective", Proc. IEEE, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 894-914, May 2009.
8.
M. Costa and A. Ephremides, "Energy efficiency versus performance in cognitive wireless networks", IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1336-1347, May 2016.
9.
L. Zhang, M. Xiao, G. Wu, S. Li and Y.-C. Liang, "Energy-efficient cognitive transmission with imperfect spectrum sensing", IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1320-1335, May 2016.
10.
M. R. Mili, L. Musavian, K. A. Hamdi and F. Marvasti, "How to increase energy efficiency in cognitive radio networks", IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1829-1843, May 2016.
11.
R. Kishore, C. K. Ramesha, S. Gurugopinath and K. R. Anupama, "Performance analysis of superior selective reporting-based energy efficient cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks", Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 65, pp. 99-116, Oct. 2017.
12.
H. Hu, H. Zhang and Y.-C. Liang, "On the spectrum- and energy-efficiency tradeoff in cognitive radio networks", IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 490-501, Feb. 2016.
13.
N. I. Miridakis, T. A. Tsiftsis, G. C. Alexandropoulos and M. Debbah, "Green cognitive relaying: Opportunistically switching between data transmission and energy harvesting", IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 3725-3738, Dec. 2016.
14.
A. E. Shafie, N. Al-Dhahir and R. Hamila, "A sparsity-aware cooperative protocol for cognitive radio networks with energy-harvesting primary user", IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 3118-3131, Sep. 2015.
15.
J. Ren et al., "RF energy harvesting and transfer in cognitive radio sensor networks: Opportunities and challenges", IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 104-110, Jan. 2018.
16.
S. H. Kim and D. I. Kim, "Hybrid backscatter communication for wireless-powered heterogeneous networks", IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 6557-6570, Oct. 2017.
17.
D. T. Hoang, D. Niyato, P. Wang, D. I. Kim and Z. Han, "Ambient backscatter: A new approach to improve network performance for RF-powered cognitive radio networks", IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 3659-3674, Sep. 2017.
18.
L. R. Varshney, "Transporting information and energy simultaneously", Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory, pp. 1612-1616, Jul. 2008.
19.
X. Lu, P. Wang, D. Niyato, D. I. Kim and Z. Han, "Wireless networks with RF energy harvesting: A contemporary survey", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 757-789, 2nd Quart. 2015.
20.
T. D. P. Perera, D. N. K. Jayakody, S. K. Sharma, S. Chatzinotas and J. Li, "Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT): Recent advances and future challenges", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 264-302, 1st Quart. 2018.
21.
J. Yan and Y. Liu, "A dynamic SWIPT approach for cooperative cognitive radio networks", IEEE Trans. Veh. Commun., vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 11122-11136, Dec. 2017.
22.
F. Benkhelifa, K. Tourki and M.-S. Alouini, "Proactive spectrum sharing for SWIPT in MIMO cognitive radio systems using antenna switching technique", IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 204-222, Jun. 2017.
23.
A. A. Al-habob, A. M. Salhab, S. A. Zummo and M.-S. Alouini, "Multi-destination cognitive radio relay network with SWIPT and multiple primary receivers", Proc. WCNC, pp. 1-6, Mar. 2017.
24.
J. F. Ensworth and M. S. Reynolds, "BLE-backscatter: Ultralow-power IoT nodes compatible with Bluetooth 4.0 low energy (BLE) smartphones and tablets", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 3360-3368, Sep. 2017.
25.
S. Shao, A. Khreishah and H. Elgala, "Pixelated VLC-backscattering for self-charging indoor IoT devices", IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 177-180, Jan. 2017.
26.
N. V. Huynh et al., "Ambient backscatter communications: A contemporary survey", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2889-2922, 4th Quart. 2018.
27.
M. E. Ahmed, D. I. Kim and K. W. Choi, "Traffic-aware optimal spectral access in wireless powered cognitive radio networks", IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 733-745, Mar. 2018.
28.
F. Benkhelifa and M.-S. Alouini, "Prioritizing data/energy thresholding-based antenna switching for SWIPT-enabled secondary receiver in cognitive radio networks", IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 782-800, Dec. 2017.
29.
Y. Wang, Y. Wang, F. Zhou, Y. Wu and H. Zhou, "Resource allocation in wireless powered cognitive radio networks based on a practical non-linear energy harvesting model", IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 17618-17626, 2017.
30.
B. Clerckx, Z. B. Zawawi and K. Huang, "Wirelessly powered backscatter communications: Waveform design and SNR-energy tradeoff", IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 2234-2237, Oct. 2017.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.