Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
Autonomic Management Approach for Dynamic Service Based IoT Systems | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Autonomic Management Approach for Dynamic Service Based IoT Systems


Abstract:

The Internet of Things (IoT) continues to expand undeniably fast to reach billions of connected heterogeneous devices. This is changing the way systems are built: new app...Show More

Abstract:

The Internet of Things (IoT) continues to expand undeniably fast to reach billions of connected heterogeneous devices. This is changing the way systems are built: new applications integrating software and physical devices are emerging in different domains, such as health, smart building, and smart cities. This brings opportunities to enable new added value services. Nevertheless, building and managing such highly dynamic and heterogeneous infrastructures built upon a multitude of mobile and resource-limited devices is challenging. In this paper, we propose a semantic based autonomic management approach for service oriented IoT systems. The aim is to support building and managing highly dynamic new value added IoT services. The proposed approach relies on a semantic based model to characterize the system properties and then enables semantic reasoning, and graph grammars to enable its management and evolution. A use case is proposed to show the related features of the proposed approach and an evaluation study is presented.
Date of Conference: 19-21 June 2018
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 11 November 2018
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Rome, Italy
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

During the past few years, the IoT expanded in an impressive way and is still growing in terms of number of connected devices. More than 20 billions of connected things are expected in the next years

http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3598917

. This growth goes along with the development of new solutions and the enhancement of smarter and more complex systems.

Select All
1.
A. Al-Fuqaha, A. Khreishah, M. Guizani, A. Rayes and M. Mohammadi, "Toward better horizontal integration among IoT services", Communications Magazine IEEE, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 72-79, 2015.
2.
F. Aïssaoui, G. Garzone and N. Seydoux, "Providing Interoperability for Autonomic Control of Connected Devices", Interoperability Safety and Security in IoT. InterIoT 2016 SaSeIoT 2016. LNICST, vol. 190, pp. 33-40, 2017.
3.
A. Zanella, N. Bui, A. Castellani, L. Vangelista and M. Zorzi, "Internet of Things for Smart Cities", IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 22-32, 2014.
4.
I. Guidara, I. Al Jaouhari and N. Guermouche, "Dynamic Selection for Service Composition Based on Temporal and QoS Constraints", 2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), pp. 267-274, 6 2016.
5.
R. Aschoff and A. Zisman, "QoS-Driven Proactive Adaptation of Service Composition", 9th International Conference ICSOC 2011, vol. 7084, pp. 421-435, 2011.
6.
R. Ramacher and L. Monch, "Reliable Service Reconfiguration for Time-Critical Service Compositions", 2013 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, pp. 184-191, 6 2013.
7.
J.O. Kephart and D.M. Chess, "The vision of autonomic computing", Computer, vol. 36, pp. 41-50, 2003.
8.
N. Delgado, A. Gates and S. Roach, "A taxonomy and catalog of runtime software-fault monitoring tools", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 30, pp. 859-872, 2004.
9.
M. Palacios, J. García-Fanjul and J. Tuya, "Testing in Service Oriented Architectures with dynamic binding: A mapping study", Information and Software Technology, vol. 53, pp. 171-189, 2011.
10.
A. Mosincat and W. Binder, "Automated maintenance of service compositions with SLA violation detection and dynamic binding", International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, vol. 13, pp. 167-179, 2011.
11.
N. Seydoux, K. Drira, N. Hernandez and T. Monteil, "Iot-O a core-domain IoT ontology to represent connected devices networks", Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. EKAW 2016, vol. 10024, pp. 561-576, 11 2016.
12.
G. Rozenberg and H. Ehrig, Handbook of graph grammars and computing by graph transformation, World Scientific, vol. 1, 1997.
13.
I. Horrocks, P.F. Patel-schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof and M. Dean, "SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML", W3C Member submission, vol. 21, pp. 1-20, May 2004.
14.
H. Ehrig, R. Heckel, M. Korff, M. Löwe, L. Ribeiro and A. Wagner, "Algebraic Approaches to Graph Transformation: Part II: Single Pushout Approach and Comparison with Double Pushout Approach", Handbook of graph grammars and computing by graph transformation, pp. 247-312, 1997.
15.
K.S. M. Chan, J. Bishop and L. Baresi, "Survey and comparison of planning techniques for web services composition", Africa, pp. 43-54, October 2007.
16.
M. Aljawarneh, L.D. Dhomeja and Y.A. Malkani, Context-aware Service Composition of Heterogeneous Services in Pervasive Computing Environments: A Review, no. 1, pp. 0-5, 2016.
17.
D. Hutchison and J.C. Mitchell, Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition, Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, vol. 3387, 2005.
18.
Z.-Z. Liu, D.-H. Chu, Z.-P. Jia, J.-Q. Shen and L. Wang, "Two-stage approach for reliable dynamic Web service composition", Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 97, pp. 123-143, 2016.
19.
R.A. H.M. Rupasingha, I. Paik and B.T. G.S. Kumara, Domain-aware Web Service Clustering based on Ontology Generation by Text Mining, 2016.
20.
S. Chattopadhyay, A. Banerjee and N. Banerjee, "A Scalable and Approximate Mechanism for Web Service Composition", Proceedings - 2015 IEEE International Conference on Web Services ICWS 2015, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 9-16, 2015.
21.
R.J. R. Raj and T. Sasipraba, "Web service selection based on QoS Constraints", Trendz in Information Sciences & Computing (TISC) 2010, vol. 6, pp. 156-162, 2010.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.