Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Multispectral Image Restoration via Inter- and Intra-Block Sparse Estimation Based on Physically-Induced Joint Spatiospectral Structures | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Multispectral Image Restoration via Inter- and Intra-Block Sparse Estimation Based on Physically-Induced Joint Spatiospectral Structures


Abstract:

Existing low-level vision algorithms (e.g., those for superresolution, denoising, and deblurring) were primarily motivated and optimized for precision in spatial domain. ...Show More

Abstract:

Existing low-level vision algorithms (e.g., those for superresolution, denoising, and deblurring) were primarily motivated and optimized for precision in spatial domain. However, high precision in spectral domain is of importance for many applications in scientific and technical fields, such as spectral analysis, recognition, and classification. In quest for both high spectral and spatial fidelity, we introduce previously unexplored, physically induced, and joint spatiospectral sparsities to improve existing methods for multispectral image restoration. The bidirectional image formation model is used to reveal that the discontinuities of a multispectral image tend to align spatially across different spectral bands; in other words, the 2D Laplacians of different bands are not only sparse each, but they also agree with one the other in significance positions. Such strongly structured sparsities give rise to a new inter- and intra-block sparse estimation approach. The estimation is performed on 3D spatiospectral sample blocks, rather than on separate 2D patches, per spectral band or per luminance and chrominance component as in current practice. Moreover, intra-block and inter-block sparsity priors are combined via an intra-block l1-2 -norm minimization term and an inter-block low-rank term, strengthening the regularization of the underlying inverse problem. The new approach is tested and evaluated on two concrete applications. The superresolving and denoising multispectral images; its validity and advantages over the current state-of-the-art are established by empirical results.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Image Processing ( Volume: 27, Issue: 8, August 2018)
Page(s): 4038 - 4051
Date of Publication: 18 April 2018

ISSN Information:

PubMed ID: 29993635

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

In scientific, medical, remote sensing and other technical fields, many vision tasks, such as segmentation [1], tracking [2], classification [3], recognition [4], [5], etc., require both high spatial resolution and high spectral fidelity of input images [6]–[9]. For instances, in environment studies, in order to discriminate different types of vegetation that are closely and intricately mingled on earth surface, measure and track their growths, remote sensing images must offer high precision in both spectral and spatial domains; such is also the case in urban planning and administration for accurate classification and measurement of man-made and natural objects using multispectral images. The same is true in quantitative medical diagnosis, such as accurate identification, segmentation and assessment of skin lesions based on dermatology images. Even for imaging products and services in consumer applications, the thrust of technology development is shifting from high spatial resolution to high color quality. Indeed, nowadays many optical image acquisition and display devices push color reproduction fidelity to the limit of human vision.

Select All
1.
Y. Tarabalka, M. Fauvel, J. Chanussot and J. A. Benediktsson, "Segmentation and classification of hyperspectral images using minimum spanning forest grown from automatically selected markers", IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1267-1279, Oct. 2011.
2.
H. Van Nguyen, A. Banerjee and R. Chellappa, "Tracking via object reflectance using a hyperspectral video camera", Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. Workshops (CVPRW), pp. 44-51, Jun. 2010.
3.
M. Fauvel, Y. Tarabalka, J. A. Benediktsson, J. Chanussot and J. C. Tilton, "Advances in spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral images", Proc. IEEE, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 652-675, Mar. 2013.
4.
D. Zhang, W. Zuo and F. Yue, "A comparative study of palmprint recognition algorithms", ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 2, 2012.
5.
M. Uzair, A. Mahmood and A. S. Mian, "Hyperspectral face recognition using 3D-DCT and partial least squares", Proc. BMVC, pp. 57-1-57-10, 2013.
6.
M. Yamaguchi, M. Mitsui, Y. Murakami, H. Fukuda, N. Ohyama and Y. Kubota, "Multispectral color imaging for dermatology: Application in inflammatory and immunologic diseases", Proc. Color Imag. Conf., pp. 52-58, 2005.
7.
J. A. Berni, P. J. Zarco-Tejada, L. Suarez and E. Fereres, "Thermal and narrowband multispectral remote sensing for vegetation monitoring from an unmanned aerial vehicle", IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 722-738, Mar. 2009.
8.
E. Adam, O. Mutanga and D. Rugege, "Multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing for identification and mapping of wetland vegetation: A review", Wetlands Ecol. Manage., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 281-296, 2010.
9.
U. Heiden, W. Heldens, S. Roessner, K. Segl, T. Esch and A. Mueller, "Urban structure type characterization using hyperspectral remote sensing and height information", Landscape Urban Planning, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 361-375, 2012.
10.
I. Daubechies, M. Defrise and C. De Mol, "An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint", Commun. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 1413-1457, Nov. 2004.
11.
K. Dabov, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik and K. Egiazarian, "Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 2080-2095, Aug. 2007.
12.
K. Dabov, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik and K. Egiazarian, "Color image denoising via sparse 3D collaborative filtering with grouping constraint in luminance-chrominance space", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process. (ICIP), vol. 1, pp. I–313, Oct. 2007.
13.
J. Mairal, M. Elad and G. Sapiro, "Sparse representation for color image restoration", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 53-69, Jan. 2008.
14.
J. Mairal, F. Bach, J. Ponce, G. Sapiro and A. Zisserman, "Non-local sparse models for image restoration", Proc. IEEE 12th Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., pp. 2272-2279, Oct. 2009.
15.
M. Elad, M. A. T. Figueiredo and Y. Ma, "On the role of sparse and redundant representations in image processing", Proc. IEEE, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 972-982, Jun. 2010.
16.
J. A. Tropp and S. J. Wright, "Computational methods for sparse solution of linear inverse problems", Proc. IEEE, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 948-958, 2010.
17.
J. Yang, J. Wright, T. S. Huang and Y. Ma, "Image super-resolution via sparse representation", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 2861-2873, Nov. 2010.
18.
W. Dong, L. Zhang and G. Shi, "Centralized sparse representation for image restoration", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV), pp. 1259-1266, Nov. 2011.
19.
W. Dong, G. Shi and X. Li, "Nonlocal image restoration with bilateral variance estimation: A low-rank approach", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 700-711, Feb. 2013.
20.
W. Dong, L. Zhang, G. Shi and X. Li, "Nonlocally centralized sparse representation for image restoration", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1620-1630, Apr. 2013.
21.
A. Rajwade, A. Rangarajan and A. Banerjee, "Image denoising using the higher order singular value decomposition", IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 849-862, Apr. 2013.
22.
W. Dong, X. Li, Y. Ma and G. Shi, "Image restoration via Bayesian structured sparse coding", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process. (ICIP), pp. 4018-4022, Oct. 2014.
23.
S. Gu, L. Zhang, W. Zuo and X. Feng, "Weighted nuclear norm minimization with application to image denoising", Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), pp. 2862-2869, Jun. 2014.
24.
R. Timofte, V. De Smet and L. Van Gool, "A+: Adjusted anchored neighborhood regression for fast super-resolution", Proc. Asian Conf. Comput. Vis. (ACCV), pp. 111-126, Nov. 2014.
25.
W. Dong, G. Shi, Y. Ma and X. Li, "Image restoration via simultaneous sparse coding: Where structured sparsity meets Gaussian scale mixture", Int. J. Comput. Vis., vol. 114, pp. 1-16, Sep. 2015.
26.
J. Sun and Z. Xu, "Color image denoising via discriminatively learned iterative shrinkage", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 4148-4159, Nov. 2015.
27.
S. Osher, Z. Shi and W. Zhu, "Low dimensional manifold model for image processing", SIAM J. Imag. Sci., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1669-1690, 2016.
28.
Z. Shi, S. Osher and W. Zhu, "Low dimensional manifold model with semi-local patches", 2016.
29.
A. Buades, B. Coll and J.-M. Morel, "A non-local algorithm for image denoising", Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), vol. 2, pp. 60-65, Jun. 2005.
30.
J. A. Tropp, A. C. Gilbert and M. J. Strauss, "Algorithms for simultaneous sparse approximation. Part I: Greedy pursuit", Signal Process., vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 572-588, 2006.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.