Hyperspectral image fusion based on non-factorization sparse representation and error matrix estimation | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Hyperspectral image fusion based on non-factorization sparse representation and error matrix estimation


Abstract:

Matrix factorization with non-negative constrains is widely used in hyperspectral image fusion. Nevertheless, the non-negative restriction on the sparse coefficients limi...Show More

Abstract:

Matrix factorization with non-negative constrains is widely used in hyperspectral image fusion. Nevertheless, the non-negative restriction on the sparse coefficients limits the efficiency of dictionary representation. To solve this problem, a new hyperspectral image fusion method based on non-factorization sparse representation and error matrix estimation is proposed in this paper, for the fusion of remotely sensed high-spatial multi-bands image with low-spatial hyperspectral image in the same scene. Firstly, an efficient spectral dictionary learning method is specifically adopted for the construction of the spectral dictionary, which avoids the procedure of matrix factorization. Then, the sparse codes of the high-spatial multi-bands image with respect to the learned spectral dictionary are estimated using the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) without non-negative constrains. For improving the quality of final fusion result, an error matrix estimation method is also proposed, exploiting the spatial structure information after non-factorization sparse representation. Experimental results both on simulated and real datasets demonstrate that, compared with the related state-of-the-art methods, our proposed method achieves the highest quality of hyperspectral image fusion, which can improve PSNR over 2.5844 and SAM over 0.3758.
Date of Conference: 14-16 November 2017
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 08 March 2018
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
References is not available for this document.

1. Introduction

High-spatial hyperspectral images have been widely used in various fields, such as environment monitoring, precision agriculture, military detective and so on. Nevertheless, the increasing of spectral bands in hyperspectal imaging, leads to enlarging the size of the photosensitive elements, which results in the limitations on spatial resolution [1]. Normally, the spatial information lost in hyperspectral imaging, can be obtained by fusing high-spatial multi-bands images through some kind of post processing.

Select All
1.
N. Akhtar, F. Shafait and A. Mian, "Sparse spatio-spectral representation for hyperspectral image super-resolution", IEEE ECCV, pp. 63-78, 2014.
2.
L. Alparone, L. Wald, J. Chanussot, C. Thomas, P. Gamba and L. M. Bruce, "Comparison of pansharpening algorithms: Outcome of the 2006 GRS-S data-fusion contest", IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 3012-3021, 2007.
3.
N. Keshava and J. F. Mustard, "Spectral unmixing", IEEE signal processing magazine, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 44-57, 2002.
4.
Z. W. Pan, H. L. Shen, C. Li, S. J. Chen and J. H. Xin, "Fast Multispectral Imaging by Spatial Pixel-Binning and Spectral Unmixing", IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 3612-3625, 2016.
5.
M. A. Veganzones, M. Simoes, G. Licciardi, N. Yokoya, J. M. Bioucas-Dias and J. Chanussot, "Hyperspectral super-resolution of locally low rank images from complementary multisource data", IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 274-288, 2016.
6.
R. Kawakami, Y. Matsushita, J. Wright, M. Ben-Ezra, Y. W. Tai and K. Ikeuchi, "High-resolution hyperspectral imaging via matrix factorization", IEEE CVPR, pp. 2329-2336, 2011.
7.
B. Huang, H. Song, H. Cui, J. Peng and Z. Xu, "Spatial and spectral image fusion using sparse matrix factorization", IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1693-1704, 2014.
8.
E. Wycoff, T. H. Chan, K. Jia, W. K. Ma and Y. Ma, "A nonnegative sparse promoting algorithm for high resolution hyperspectral imaging", IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 1409-1413, 2013.
9.
C. Grohnfeldt, X. X. Zhu and R. Bamler, "Jointly sparse fusion of hyperspectral and multispectral imagery", Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 2013 IEEE International, 2013.
10.
W. Dong, F. Fu, G. Shi, X. Cao, J. Wu, G. Li, et al., "Hyperspectral Image Super-Resolution via Non-Negative Structured Sparse Representation", IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 2337-2352, 2016.
11.
J. M. Bioucas-Dias, A. Plaza, N. Dobigeon, M. Parente, Q. Du, P. Gader, et al., "Hyperspectral unmixing overview: Geometrical statistical and sparse regression-based approaches", IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 354-379, 2012.
12.
M. Aharon, M. Elad and A. Bruckstein, "K-SVD: An Algorithm for Designing Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation", IEEE Transactions on signal processing, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 4311-4322, 2006.
13.
J. Mairal, F. Bach, J. Ponce and G. Sapiro, "Online learning for matrix factorization and sparse coding", Journal of Machine Learning Research, pp. 19-60, 2010.
14.
S. Boyd, N. Parikh, E. Chu, B. Peleato and J. Eckstein, "Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers", Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-122, 2011.
15.
R. Keys, "Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing", IEEE transactions on acoustics speech and signal processing, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1153-1160, 1981.
16.
D. D. Muresan, "Fast edge directed polynomial interpolation", Image Processing 2005. ICIP 2005. IEEE International Conference on, vol. 2, 2005.
17.
L. Zhang and X. Wu, "An edge-guided image interpolation algorithm via directional filtering and data fusion", IEEE transactions on Image Processing, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 2226-2238, 2006.
18.
Q. Wei, J. Bioucas-Dias, N. Dobigeon and J. Y. Tourneret, "Hyperspectral and multispectral image fusion based on a sparse representation", IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 3658-3668, 2015.
19.
[online] Available: http://www.specim.fi/.
20.
[online] Available: https://www.edmundoptics.com/optics/.
21.
A. Goshtasby, "Image registration by local approximation methods", Image and Vision Computing, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 255-261, 1988.
22.
A. Mittal, A. K. Moorthy and A. C. Bovik, "No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain", IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 4695-4708, 2012.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.