Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
A Low-Noise, Wireless, Frequency-Shaping Neural Recorder | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

A Low-Noise, Wireless, Frequency-Shaping Neural Recorder


Abstract:

This paper presents a low-noise, wireless neural recorder that has a frequency dependent amplification to remove electrode offset and to attenuate motion artifacts. The r...Show More

Abstract:

This paper presents a low-noise, wireless neural recorder that has a frequency dependent amplification to remove electrode offset and to attenuate motion artifacts. The recorder has 2.5 GQ and 50 MQ input impedance at 20 Hz and 1 kHz for recording local field potentials and extracellular spikes, respectively. To reduce the input-referred noise, we propose a low-noise frontend design with multiple novel noise suppression techniques. To reduce the power consumption, we have integrated an exponential component and polynomial component spike processor that automatically adjusts the recording bandwidth based on the signal contents. In bench-top measurement, the proposed neural recorder has 2.2-μV input-referred noise integrated from 300 Hz to 8 kHz and consumes 98-μW maximum power. In animal experiments, the output data of the neural signal processor are serialized and connected to a customized WiFi data link with up to 10 Mbps data rate. Through in vivo experiments, we find that the noise generated by the WiFi does not prevent brain recordings with microelectrodes and a clear interpretation of the neural signals; however, the noise can mask the weaker neural signals in nerve recordings with epineural electrodes.
Page(s): 187 - 200
Date of Publication: 05 March 2018

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Neural recording circuits and systems are to acquire data from the nerve systems [1]–[8], where neural signals typically include multiple frequency components. For example, in the brain recording with penetrating probes, local field potentials (LFPs) appear at a low-frequency range from less than 1 Hz to 300 Hz while neural spikes are from 300 Hz to 8 kHz. The amplitude of neural signals depends on the animal preparations, the type of electrodes, and the recording locations, which can vary from a few (e.g. vagus nerve signals on epineural electrodes) to tens of mV (e.g. signals during a seizure). The neural signals are accompanied with various artifacts from muscles and organs, as well as interferences from ambient environment. Separating neural signals from artifacts and interferences requires a well characterized experimental environment and a high-precision data acquisition device.

Select All
1.
R. Wattanapanitch and R. Sarpeshkar, "A low-power 32-channel digitally programmable neural recording integrated circuit", IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 592-602, Dec. 2011.
2.
R. Walker et al., " A 96-channel full data rate direct neural interface in 0.13~mu text{m} CMOS ", IEEE Symp. VLSI Circuits Dig. Tech. Papers, pp. 144-145, Jun. 2011.
3.
K. Abdelhalim, L. Kokarovtseva, J. L. Velazquez and R. Genov, "915-MHz FSK/OOK wireless neural recording SoC with 64 mixed-signal FIR filters", IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 2478-2493, Oct. 2013.
4.
N. V. Helleputte, S. Kim, H. Kim, J. Kim, C. Van Hoof and R. F. Yazicioglu, " A 160~mu text{A} biopotential acquisition ASIC with fully integrated IA and motion-artifact suppression ", IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conf. (ISSCC) Dig. Tech. Papers, pp. 118-119, Feb. 2012.
5.
J. Xu, T. Wu and Z. Yang, "A new system architecture for future long-term high-density neural recording", IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Exp. Briefs, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 402-406, Jul. 2013.
6.
Z. Yang et al., "A new EC–PC threshold estimation method for in vivo neural spike detection", J. Neural Eng., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 046017, Aug. 2012.
7.
V. Chaturvedi and B. Amrutur, "An area-efficient noise-adaptive neural amplifier in 130 nm CMOS technology", IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Circuits Syst., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 536-545, Dec. 2011.
8.
S. Robinet et al., " A low-power 0.7~mu Vrms 32-channel mixed-signal circuit for ECoG recordings ", IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Circuits Syst., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 451-460, Dec. 2011.
9.
K.-H. Teng, T. Wu, X. Liu, Z. Yang and C.-H. Heng, " A 400 MHz wireless neural signal processing IC with 625times on-chip data reduction and reconfigurable BFSK/QPSK transmitter based on sequential injection locking ", IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 547-557, Jun. 2017.
10.
S. B. Lee, B. Lee, M. Kiani, B. Mahmoudi, R. Gross and M. Ghovanloo, "An inductively-powered wireless neural recording system with a charge sampling analog front-end", IEEE J. Sensors, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 475-484, Jan. 2016.
11.
J. Xu and Z. Yang, " A 50~mu text{W} /Ch artifacts-insensitive neural recorder using frequency-shaping technique ", Proc. IEEE Custom Integr. Circuits Conf. (CICC), pp. 1-4, Sep. 2013.
12.
J. Xu, T. Wu, W. Liu and Z. Yang, "A frequency shaping neural recorder with 3 pF input capacitance and 11 plus 4.5 bits dynamic range", IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 510-527, Aug. 2014.
13.
T. Wu, W. Zhao, H. Guo, H. H. Lim and Z. Yang, "A streaming PCA VLSI chip for neural data compression", IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1290-1302, Dec. 2017.
14.
T. Wu et al., "A 16-channel nonparametric spike detection ASIC based on EC-PC decomposition", IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3-17, Feb. 2016.
15.
J. Xu, T. Wu and Z. Yang, "A power efficient frequency shaping neural recorder with automatic bandwidth adjustment", Proc. IEEE Int. Asian Solid-State Circuit Conf. (A-SSCC), pp. 197-200, Nov. 2014.
16.
R. Harrison et al., "A low-power integrated circuit for a wireless 100-electrode neural recording system", IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 123-133, Jan. 2007.
17.
C. M. Lopez et al., "A multichannel integrated circuit for electrical recording of neural activity with independent channel programmability", IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 101-110, Apr. 2012.
18.
F. Zhang, J. Holleman and B. P. Otis, "Design of ultra-low power biopotential amplifiers for biosignal acquisition applications", IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 344-355, Aug. 2012.
19.
M. S. Chae, W. Liu and M. Sivaprakasam, "Design optimization for integrated neural recording systems", IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1931-1939, Sep. 2008.
20.
R. R. Harrison and C. Charles, "A low-power low-noise CMOS amplifier for neural recording applications", IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 958-965, Jun. 2003.
21.
R. Sarpeshkar et al., "Low-power circuits for brain–machine interfaces", IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 173-183, Sep. 2008.
22.
R. Müller, S. Gambini and J. M. Rabaey, " A 0.013 mm 2 5~mu text{W} DC-coupled neural signal acquisition IC with 0.5 V supply ", IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 232-243, Jan. 2012.
23.
H. Gao et al., " HermesE: A 96-channel full data rate direct neural interface in 0.13~mu text{m} CMOS ", IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1043-1055, Apr. 2012.
24.
S. Vemkatraman, C. Patten and J. M. Carmena, " Exploiting the 1/f structure of neural signals for the design of integrated neural amplifiers ", Proc. 31sh Annu. Int. IEEE EMBS Conf., pp. 2050-2053, Sep. 2009.
25.
C. Bédard, H. Kröger and A. Destexhe, " Does the 1/f frequency scaling of brain signals reflect self-organized critical states? ", Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 118102, Sep. 2006.
26.
E. W. Keefer, B. R. Botterman, M. I. Romero, A. F. Rossi and G. W. Gross, "Carbon nanotube coating improves neuronal recordings", Nature Nanotechnol., vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 434-439, Jul. 2008.
27.
C. C. Enz and G. C. Temes, "Circuit techniques for reducing the effects of op-amp imperfections: Autozeroing correlated double sampling and chopper stabilization", Proc. IEEE, vol. 84, no. 11, pp. 1584-1614, Nov. 1996.
28.
M. S. Chae, Z. Yang, M. R. Yuce, L. Hoang and W. Liu, "A 128-channel 6 mW wireless neural recording IC with spike feature extraction and UWB transmitter", IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 312-321, Aug. 2009.
29.
R. R. Harrison et al., "Wireless neural recording with single low-power integrated circuit", IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 322-329, Aug. 2009.
30.
T. Szuts et al., "A wireless multi-channel neural amplifier for freely moving animals", Nature Neurosci., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 263-269, Feb. 2011.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.