Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
Deep Learning for Passive Synthetic Aperture Radar | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Deep Learning for Passive Synthetic Aperture Radar


Abstract:

We introduce a deep learning (DL) framework for inverse problems in imaging, and demonstrate the advantages and applicability of this approach in passive synthetic apertu...Show More

Abstract:

We introduce a deep learning (DL) framework for inverse problems in imaging, and demonstrate the advantages and applicability of this approach in passive synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image reconstruction. We interpret image reconstruction as a machine learning task and utilize deep networks as forward and inverse solvers for imaging. Specifically, we design a recurrent neural network (RNN) architecture as an inverse solver based on the iterations of proximal gradient descent optimization methods. We further adapt the RNN architecture to image reconstruction problems by transforming the network into a recurrent auto-encoder, thereby allowing for unsupervised training. Our DL based inverse solver is particularly suitable for a class of image formation problems in which the forward model is only partially known. The ability to learn forward models and hyper parameters combined with unsupervised training approach establish our recurrent auto-encoder suitable for real world applications. We demonstrate the performance of our method in passive SAR image reconstruction. In this regime a source of opportunity, with unknown location and transmitted waveform, is used to illuminate a scene of interest. We investigate recurrent auto-encoder architecture based on the ℓ1 and ℓ0 constrained least-squares problem. We present a projected stochastic gradient descent based training scheme which incorporates constraints of the unknown model parameters. We demonstrate through extensive numerical simulations that our DL based approach out performs conventional sparse coding methods in terms of computation and reconstructed image quality, specifically, when no information about the transmitter is available.
Published in: IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing ( Volume: 12, Issue: 1, February 2018)
Page(s): 90 - 103
Date of Publication: 15 December 2017

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Deep Learning (DL) has dramatically advanced the state-of-the-art for many problems in science and engineering. These include speech recognition, natural language processing, visual object recognition, and many others [1], [2]. In this paper, we present a novel DL framework for inverse problems in imaging and demonstrate its applicability and advantages in passive synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image reconstruction.

Select All
1.
Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio and G. Hinton, "Deep learning", Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436-444, 2015.
2.
Y. Bengio, A. Courville and P. Vincent, "Representation learning: A review and new perspectives", IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1798-1828, Aug. 2013.
3.
S. Mallat, "Understanding deep convolutional networks", Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, vol. 374, no. 2065, 2016.
4.
T. Wiatowski and H. Bölcskei, "A mathematical theory of deep convolutional neural networks for feature extraction", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, no. 99, 2017.
5.
S. Soatto, J. Dong and N. Karianakis, "Visual scene representations: Contrast scaling and occlusion", Proc Int. Conf. Learn. Representations, 2015, [online] Available: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.6607.
6.
S. Soatto and A. Chiuso, "Visual representations: Defining properties and deep approximations", Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Representations, 2016.
7.
A. B. Patel, T. Nguyen and R. G. Baraniuk, "A probabilistic theory of deep learning", arxiv.org, 2015.
8.
K. Gregor and Y. LeCun, "Learning fast approximations of sparse coding", Proc. 27th Int. Conf. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., pp. 399-406, 2010.
9.
J. T. Rolfe and Y. LeCun, "Discriminative recurrent sparse auto-encoders", Int. Conf. Learn. Representations, 2013.
10.
M. Borgerding and P. Schniter, "Onsager-corrected deep learning for sparse linear inverse problems", IEEE Global Conf. Signal Inf. Process., pp. 227-231, 2016.
11.
A. Mousavi, A. B. Patel and R. G. Baraniuk, "A deep learning approach to structured signal recovery", Proc. IEEE Commun. Control Comput. 53rd Annu. Allerton Conf., pp. 1336-1343, 2015.
12.
A. Adler, D. Boublil, M. Elad and M. Zibulevsky, "Block-based compressed sensing of images via deep learning", IEEE 19th Int. Workshop Multi. Signal Process., pp. 1-6, 2017.
13.
M. Andrychowicz et al., "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent", Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., pp. 3981-3989, 2016.
14.
P. Putzky and M. Welling, "Recurrent inference machines for solving inverse problems", arxiv.org, 2017.
15.
K. H. Jin, M. T. McCann, E. Froustey and M. Unser, "Deep convolutional neural network for inverse problems in imaging", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 4509-4522, Sep. 2017.
16.
D. E. Wahl, P. Eichel, D. Ghiglia and C. Jakowatz, "Phase gradient autofocus-a robust tool for high resolution SAR phase correction", IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 827-835, Jul. 1994.
17.
L. Xi, L. Guosui and J. Ni, "Autofocusing of isar images based on entropy minimization", IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1240-1252, Oct. 1999.
18.
J. Fienup, "Synthetic-aperture radar autofocus by maximizing sharpness", Opt. Lett., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 221-223, 2000.
19.
R. L. Morrison, M. N. Do and D. C. Munson, "MCA: A multichannel approach to SAR autofocus", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 840-853, Apr. 2009.
20.
N. Ö. Önhon and M. Cetin, "A nonquadratic regularization-based technique for joint sar imaging and model error correction", Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery XVI, vol. 7337, 2009.
21.
N. Ö. Onhon and M. Cetin, "A sparsity-driven approach for joint sar imaging and phase error correction", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 2075-2088, Apr. 2012.
22.
D. Hack, L. Patton, A. Kerrick and M. Saville, "Direct cartesian detection localization and de-ghosting for passive multistatic radar", Proc. IEEE 7th SAM Signal Process. Workshop, pp. 45-48, Jun. 2012.
23.
B. Dawidowicz, P. Samczynski, M. Malanowski, J. Misiurewicz and K. Kulpa, "Detection of moving targets with multichannel airborne passive radar", IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 42-49, Nov. 2012.
24.
J. Palmer, H. Harms, S. Searle and L. Davis, "DVB-T passive radar signal processing", IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 2116-2126, Apr. 2013.
25.
C. Yarman and B. Yazici, "Synthetic aperture hitchhiker imaging", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 2156-2173, Nov. 2008.
26.
L. Wang and B. Yazici, "Passive imaging of moving targets using sparse distributed apertures", SIAM J. Imag. Sci., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 769-808, 2012.
27.
S. Wacks and B. Yazici, "Passive synthetic aperture hitchhiker imaging of ground moving targets—Part 1: Image formation and velocity estimation", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2487-2500, Jun. 2014.
28.
P. Krysik and K. Kulpa, "The use of a GSM-based passive radar for sea target detection", Proc. Radar Conf. 9th Eur., pp. 142-145, Oct. 2012.
29.
E. Mason, I. Y. Son and B. Yazici, "Passive synthetic aperture radar imaging using low-rank matrix recovery methods", IEEE J. Select. Topics Signal Process., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1570-1582, Dec. 2015.
30.
I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio and A. Courville, Deep Learning, Cambridge, MA, USA:MIT Press, 2016, [online] Available: http://www.deeplearningbook.org.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.