Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Learning Through Fictitious Play in a Game-Theoretic Model of Natural Resource Consumption | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Learning Through Fictitious Play in a Game-Theoretic Model of Natural Resource Consumption


Abstract:

Understanding the emergence of sustainable behavior in dynamic models of resource consumption is essential for control of coupled human and natural systems. In this lette...Show More

Abstract:

Understanding the emergence of sustainable behavior in dynamic models of resource consumption is essential for control of coupled human and natural systems. In this letter, we analyze a mathematical model of resource exploitation recently reported by the authors. The model incorporates the cognitive decision-making process of consumers and has previously been studied in a game-theoretic context as a static two-player game. In this letter, we extend the analysis by allowing the agents to adapt their psychological characteristics according to simple best-response learning dynamics. We show that, under the selected learning scheme, the Nash Equilibrium is reachable provided certain conditions on the psychological attributes of the consumers are fulfilled. Moreover, the equilibrium solution obtained is found to be sustainable in the sense that no players exhibit free-riding behavior, a phenomenon which occurs in the original open-loop system. In the process, via a Lyapunov-function based approach, we also provide a proof for the asymptotic global stability of the original system which was previously known to be only locally stable.
Published in: IEEE Control Systems Letters ( Volume: 2, Issue: 1, January 2018)
Page(s): 163 - 168
Date of Publication: 27 November 2017
Electronic ISSN: 2475-1456

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

Select All
1.
A. Muhammad, "Managing river basins with thinking machines", Proc. IEEE Conf. Norbert Wiener 21st Century (21CW), pp. 1-6, 2016.
2.
D. N. Crowley, E. Curry and J. G. Breslin, "Closing the loop—From citizen sensing to citizen actuation", Proc. 7th IEEE Int. Conf. Digit. Ecosyst. Technol. (DEST), pp. 108-113, 2013.
3.
F.-Y. Wang, "The emergence of intelligent enterprises: From CPS to CPSS", IEEE Intell. Syst., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 85-88, Jul./Aug. 2010.
4.
J. A. Stankovic, "Research directions for the Internet of Things", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3-9, Feb. 2014.
5.
D. S. Nunes, P. Zhang and J. S. Silva, "A survey on human-in-the-loop applications towards an Internet of all", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 944-965, 2nd Quart., 2015.
6.
T. Manzoor, E. Rovenskaya and A. Muhammad, "Game-theoretic insights into the role of environmentalism and social-ecological relevance: A cognitive model of resource consumption", Ecol. Model., vol. 340, pp. 74-85, Nov. 2016.
7.
T. Manzoor, E. Rovenskaya and A. Muhammad, "Structural effects and aggregation in a social-network model of natural resource consumption", Proc. 20th IFAC World Congr., pp. 7675-7680, 2017.
8.
H.-J. Mosler and W. M. Brucks, "Integrating commons dilemma findings in a general dynamic model of cooperative behavior in resource crises", Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 119-133, 2003.
9.
L. Festinger, "A theory of social comparison processes", Human Relat., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117-140, 1954.
10.
D. Fudenberg and D. K. Levine, The Theory of Learning in Games, Cambridge, MA, USA:MIT Press, vol. 2, 1998.
11.
J. R. Marden et al., "Game theory and distributed control" in Handbook of Game Theory, Amsterdam, The Netherlands:Elsevier, vol. 4, pp. 861-900, 2014.
12.
R. Perman, Natural Resource and Environmental Economics, Harlow, U.K.:Pearson Educ, 2003.
13.
C. G. Rutte, H. A. M. Wilke and D. M. Messick, "Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environment as determinants of behavior in the resource dilemma", J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 208-216, 1987.
14.
N. E. Friedkin, A Structural Theory of Social Influence, Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge Univ. Press, vol. 13, 2006.
15.
P. A. M. Van Lange, J. Joireman, C. D. Parks and E. Van Dijk, "The psychology of social dilemmas: A review", Org. Behav. Human Decis. Process., vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 125-141, 2013.
16.
G. Russo and J. J. E. Slotine, "Global convergence of quorum-sensing networks", Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Top., vol. 82, no. 4, 2010.
17.
E. Ostrom, Governing the Commons, Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015.
18.
T. Brenner, "Agent learning representation: Advice on modelling economic learning" in Handbook of Computational Economics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands:Elsevier, vol. 2, pp. 895-947, 2006.
19.
W. Hoppitt and K. N. Laland, Social Learning: An Introduction to Mechanisms Methods and Models, Princeton, NJ, USA:Princeton Univ. Press, 2013.
20.
T. Manzoor, S. Aseev, E. Rovenskaya and A. Muhammad, "Optimal control for sustainable consumption of natural resources", IFAC Proc. Vol., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 10725-10730, 2014.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.