Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/AMS/Regular/Main.js
Multilevel Coding Scheme for Integer-Forcing MIMO Receivers With Binary Codes | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Multilevel Coding Scheme for Integer-Forcing MIMO Receivers With Binary Codes


Abstract:

An integer-forcing (IF) linear multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) receiver has recently been proposed, which is theoretically shown to achieve near capacity with almos...Show More

Abstract:

An integer-forcing (IF) linear multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) receiver has recently been proposed, which is theoretically shown to achieve near capacity with almost the same complexity as that of conventional linear receivers. The key idea is that the receiver attempts to directly decode integer-linear combinations of codewords. To ensure that this sum-decoding operation is feasible, in previous works, lattice codes over \mathbb {Z}_{q} were employed. Although those codes can attain good theoretical performance, however, its implementation complexity can be considerably high in practice, especially when q is large to support high-order modulations. In this paper, we propose a practical multilevel coding scheme for IF MIMO, in which multilevel encoding composed of binary linear codes (q = 2) in conjunction with the natural mapping is employed on the transmitter side and multistage decoding adapted to the IF operation is employed on the receiver side. The performance of the proposed scheme is extensively evaluated both analytically and numerically, showing that the gain of IF over conventional receivers is indeed achievable in practical settings with almost the same complexity. Our results imply that the proposed IF MIMO can be an attractive solution for the 5G communications due to its ability of supporting high spectral efficiency with low complexity.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications ( Volume: 16, Issue: 8, August 2017)
Page(s): 5428 - 5441
Date of Publication: 07 June 2017

ISSN Information:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) antenna technique can significantly improve the capacity of a wireless system with respect to the number of antennas [1], [2]. If channel state information at the transmitter (CSIT) is available, the capacity can be simply achieved by the linear singular value decomposition (SVD) beamforming and water-filling power allocation [3], with no need to consider complex algorithms such as the joint maximum likelihood (ML) decoding. In practice, however, the acquisition of CSIT is often quite challenging due to limited feedback or channel variation. In the lack of CSIT, the performance of conventional linear receivers such as the minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) receiver becomes far apart from the capacity, especially when the channel matrix is near-singular [4]–[7]. Non-linear MIMO schemes such as sphere decoding can provide an enhanced performance and its complexity reduction algorithms have also been proposed in [8]–[11]. Their complexities, however, are yet considerably high to be applicable to practical systems, especially when the number of antennas is large and/or the modulation order is high. Note that in the current Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-Advanced) system, the fourth generation (4G) communications system, up to eight streams with 256-quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) are supported for high data rate transmission, and it is highly likely that the number of supported streams and/or the supported modulation order will further increase in the next fifth generation (5G) communications system. Hence, it becomes more and more important to design a practical MIMO receiver that can support high spectral efficiency with low complexity.

Select All
1.
G. J. Foschini and M. J. Gans, "On limits of wireless communications in a fading environment when using multiple antennas", Wireless Pers. Commun., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 311-335, Mar. 1998.
2.
E. Telatar, "Capacity of multi-antenna Gaussian channels", Eur. Trans. Telecomm., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 585-595, Nov./Dec. 1999.
3.
D. Tse and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals Wireless Communication, Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005.
4.
D. J. Costello and G. D. Forney, "Channel coding: The road to channel capacity", Proc. IEEE, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 1150-1177, Jun. 2007.
5.
K. R. Kumar, G. Caire and A. L. Moustakas, "Asymptotic performance of linear receivers in MIMO fading channels", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 4398-4418, Oct. 2009.
6.
Y. Jiang, M. K. Varanasi and J. Li, "Performance analysis of ZF and MMSE equalizers for MIMO systems: An in-depth study of the high SNR regime", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2008-2026, Apr. 2011.
7.
J. Zhan, B. Nazer, U. Erez and M. Gastpar, "Integer-forcing linear receivers", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 7661-7685, Dec. 2014.
8.
E. Viterbo and J. Boutros, "A universal lattice code decoder for fading channels", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1639-1642, Jul. 1999.
9.
M. O. Damen, H. El Gamal and G. Caire, "On maximum-likelihood detection and the search for the closest lattice point", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2389-2402, Oct. 2003.
10.
B. Hassibi and H. Vikalo, "On the sphere-decoding algorithm I. Expected complexity", IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 2806-2818, Aug. 2005.
11.
J. Jalden and B. Ottersten, "On the complexity of sphere decoding in digital communications", IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1474-1484, Apr. 2005.
12.
B. Nazer and M. Gastpar, "Compute-and-forward: Harnessing interference through structured codes", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 6463-6486, Oct. 2011.
13.
O. Ordentlich and U. Erez, "Precoded integer-forcing universally achieves the MIMO capacity to within a constant gap", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 323-340, Jan. 2015.
14.
O. Ordentlich, U. Erez and B. Nazer, "Successive integer-forcing and its sum-rate optimality", Proc. 51st Annu. Allerton Conf. Commun. Control Comput. (Allerton), pp. 282-292, Oct. 2013.
15.
S.-N. Hong and G. Caire, "Quantized compute and forward: A low-complexity architecture for distributed antenna systems", Proc. IEEE Inf. Theory Workshop (ITW), pp. 420-424, Oct. 2011.
16.
S.-N. Hong and G. Caire, "Compute-and-forward strategies for cooperative distributed antenna systems", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 5227-5243, Sep. 2013.
17.
O. Ordentlich and U. Erez, "Achieving the gains promised by integer-forcing equalization with binary codes", Proc. IEEE 26th Conv. Elect. Electron. Eng. Israel (IEEEI), pp. 703-707, Nov. 2010.
18.
T. J. Richardson, M. A. Shokrollahi and R. L. Urbanke, "Design of capacity-approaching irregular low-density parity-check codes", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 619-637, Feb. 2001.
19.
B. Hern and K. R. Narayanan, "Multilevel coding schemes for compute-and-forward with flexible decoding", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 7613-7631, Nov. 2013.
20.
Z. Guo and P. Nilsson, "Algorithm and implementation of the K-best sphere decoding for MIMO detection", IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 491-503, Mar. 2006.
21.
M. K. Varanasi and T. Guess, "Optimum decision feedback multiuser equalization with successive decoding achieves the total capacity of the Gaussian multiple-access channel", Proc. Conf. Rec. 31st Asilomar Conf. Signals Syst. Comput., vol. 2, pp. 1405-1409, Nov. 1997.
22.
P. W. Wolniansky, G. J. Foschini, G. D. Golden and R. A. Valenzuela, "V-BLAST: An architecture for realizing very high data rates over the rich-scattering wireless channel", Proc. URSI Int. Symp. Signals Syst. Electron., pp. 295-300, Oct. 1998.
23.
A. K. Lenstra, H. W. Lenstra and L. Lovász, "Factoring polynomials with rational coefficients", Math. Ann., vol. 261, no. 4, pp. 515-534, Dec. 1982.
24.
L. Wei and W. Chen, "Integer-forcing linear receiver design with slowest descent method", IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 2788-2796, Jun. 2013.
25.
A. Sakzad, J. Harshan and E. Viterbo, "Integer-forcing MIMO linear receivers based on lattice reduction", IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 4905-4915, Oct. 2013.
26.
I. El Bakoury and B. Nazer, "The impact of channel variation on integer-forcing receivers", Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory (ISIT), pp. 576-580, Jun. 2015.
27.
H. Imai and S. Hirakawa, "A new multilevel coding method using error-correcting codes", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 371-377, May 1977.
28.
J. Huber and U. Wachsmann, "Capacities of equivalent channels in multilevel coding schemes", Electron. Lett., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 557-558, Mar. 1994.
29.
J. Huber, "Multilevel codes: Distance profiles and channel capacity", Proc. ITG-Fachbericht, vol. 130, pp. 305-319, Oct. 1994.
30.
Y. Kofman, E. Zehavi and S. Shamai (Shitz), "Performance analysis of a multilevel coded modulation system", IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 42, no. 234, pp. 299-312, Feb. 1994.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.