I. Introduction
In recent years, the demand for compact microstrip filters is increasing due to the recently expanding microwave and mobile communication systems. So far, a few effective techniques have been successfully developed to miniaturize the filter size and to transform a simple filter structure to multi-band filter without additional components. Nowadays multi-standard wireless communication systems require multiband operating transceivers. Dual-band and multi-band filters are in demand for these wireless systems. Beside the multiband operation, low cost, simplicity, small occupied area and performance are desired features for these filters. Over these years, microstrip planar multi-band filters have been widely proposed as an approach solution to solving the most difficult technical challenges in microwave and wireless communication areas [1]–[3]. In order to increase the number of bands of a structure, they were firstly implemented by the cascaded two filters at different frequencies, with the inherent disadvantage of increased total size [3]. Also they were realized by using a combination of a wide-band bandpass filter and a band stop filter [4]. However, the size of topology remained a big challenger. Alternatively, other techniques as filter with open stubs are used to regenerate transmission zeros in order to separate the passbands and lead to create several separate bands [3], [5]. Stepped-impedance resonators (SIR) are utilized to realize the dual-stopband characteristics, and reduce size of filters. Stepped impedance resonator (SIR) can adjust the second passband by regulation the impedance ratio and electric lengths of SIRs. By correctly choosing the relevant impedance or strip width ratio, the dual-band topologies employing SIRs can be produced [6]. On the other hand, few researchers have investigated the design of triple-band filters. Boutejdar, et. aI., Ren, et. al. and Hejazi, et. al. proposed filter using vertical and horizontal cascaded DGS-Resonators [7]–[11] and hairpin slots [12], [13]. The disadvantages in this works are the complicated used DGS shapes, the undesired coupling between the DGS resonators and the large size of the used filter structures. Quendo, et. al. proposed the dual- behavior resonators as good candidate for the design of tri-band filters [14]. Mokhtari, et. al. and Boutejdar et. al. proposed a design methodology to these kind of filters using cross-coupled networks represented by coupling matrix [15]–[17]. However, in both proposed topologies, the disadvantage of large circuit size remains a real challenge. In [15], the coupling of two tri-band dual- behavior resonators DBRs was needed to achieve a second order triple-band filter response with six poles (two poles in each band) and five transmission zeros (single zero between each transmission band and two transmission zeros to the left and to the right of all passbands). This cascaded topology shows an undesired increase in the size of the proposed filter. In [15], six hairpin resonators were needed to achieve a filter with triple-band features with six poles (two in each band) and four transmission zeros (two transmission zeros between each two bands).