Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
A Survey of Multi-Objective Optimization in Wireless Sensor Networks: Metrics, Algorithms, and Open Problems | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

A Survey of Multi-Objective Optimization in Wireless Sensor Networks: Metrics, Algorithms, and Open Problems


Abstract:

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have attracted substantial research interest, especially in the context of performing monitoring and surveillance tasks. However, it is ch...Show More

Abstract:

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have attracted substantial research interest, especially in the context of performing monitoring and surveillance tasks. However, it is challenging to strike compelling tradeoffs amongst the various conflicting optimization criteria, such as the network's energy dissipation, packet-loss rate, coverage, and lifetime. This paper provides a tutorial and survey of recent research and development efforts addressing this issue by using the technique of multi-objective optimization (MOO). First, we provide an overview of the main optimization objectives used in WSNs. Then, we elaborate on various prevalent approaches conceived for MOO, such as the family of mathematical programming-based scalarization methods, the family of heuristics/metaheuristics-based optimization algorithms, and a variety of other advanced optimization techniques. Furthermore, we summarize a range of recent studies of MOO in the context of WSNs, which are intended to provide useful guidelines for researchers to understand the referenced literature. Finally, we discuss a range of open problems to be tackled by future research.
Published in: IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials ( Volume: 19, Issue: 1, Firstquarter 2017)
Page(s): 550 - 586
Date of Publication: 16 September 2016

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Wireless sensor networks (WSN) consist of a large number of compact, low-cost, low-power, multi-functional sensor nodes that communicate wirelessly over short distances [1], [2]. In WSNs, the sensor nodes are generally deployed randomly in the field of interest, which are extensively used for performing monitoring and surveillance tasks [3]–[5]. Depending on the specific application scenarios, WSNs may rely on diverse performance metrics to be optimized. For example, the energy efficiency and network lifetime are among the major concerns in WSNs, since the sensor nodes are typically powered by battery, whose replacement is often difficult. Furthermore, the network coverage, latency and the fairness among sensor nodes are important for maintaining the quality-of-service quality-of-service (QoS) [6], [7]. In practice, these metrics often conflict with each other, hence the careful balancing of the trade-offs among them is vital in terms of optimizing the overall performance of WSNs in real applications.

Select All
1.
I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam and E. Cayirci, "A survey on sensor networks", IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 102-114, Aug. 2002.
2.
J. Yick, B. Mukherjee and D. Ghosal, "Wireless sensor network survey", Comput. Netw., vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 2292-2330, Aug. 2008.
3.
D. Bruckner, C. Picus, R. Velik, W. Herzner and G. Zucker, "Hierarchical semantic processing architecture for smart sensors in surveillance networks", IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 291-301, May 2012.
4.
H. Yetgin, K. T. K. Cheung, M. El-Hajjar and L. Hanzo, "Network-lifetime maximization of wireless sensor networks", IEEE Access, vol. 3, pp. 2191-2226, 2015, [online] Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp==7322190.
5.
G. Han, J. Jiang, N. Bao, L. Wan and M. Guizani, "Routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks", IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 72-78, Nov. 2015.
6.
F. Wang and J. Liu, "Networked wireless sensor data collection: Issues challenges and approaches", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 673-687, 4th Quart. 2011.
7.
L. Cheng, J. Niu, J. Cao, S. K. Das and Y. Gu, "QoS aware geographic opportunistic routing in wireless sensor networks", IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1864-1875, Jul. 2014.
8.
J. Lu, X. Wang, L. Zhang and X. Zhao, "Fuzzy random multi-objective optimization based routing for wireless sensor networks", Soft Comput., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 981-994, May 2014.
9.
R. T. Marler and J. Arora, "Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering", Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 369-395, Apr. 2004.
10.
R. Tharmarasa, T. Kirubarajan, J. Peng and T. Lang, "Optimization-based dynamic sensor management for distributed multitarget tracking", IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C Appl. Rev., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 534-546, Sep. 2009.
11.
A. Konstantinidis, K. Yang, Q. Zhang and D. Zeinalipour-Yazti, "A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for the deployment and power assignment problem in wireless sensor networks", Comput. Netw., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 960-976, Apr. 2010.
12.
B. S. P. Reddy and C. S. P. Rao, "A hybrid multi-objective GA for simultaneous scheduling of machines and AGVs in FMS", Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 602-613, Dec. 2006.
13.
C. A. C. Coello, G. T. Pulido and M. S. Lechuga, "Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization", IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 256-279, Jun. 2004.
14.
H. Li and Q. Zhang, "Multiobjective optimization problems with complicated Pareto sets MOEA/D and NSGA-II", IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 284-302, Apr. 2009.
15.
M. Ehrgott and M. M. Wiecek, "Multiobjective programming" in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, New York, NY, USA, vol. 78, pp. 667-708, 2005.
16.
E. Zitzler and L. Thiele, "Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach", IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 257-271, Nov. 1999.
17.
K. S. N. Ripon, C.-H. Tsang and S. Kwong, "Multi-objective evolutionary job-shop scheduling using jumping genes genetic algorithm", Proc. IEEE Int. Joint Conf. Neural Netw. (IJCNN), pp. 3100-3107, 2006.
18.
Z. Zhang, K. Long, J. Wang and F. Dressler, "On swarm intelligence inspired self-organized networking: Its bionic mechanisms designing principles and optimization approaches", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 513-537, 1st Quart. 2014.
19.
A. Zhou et al., "Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art", Swarm Evol. Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 32-49, Mar. 2011.
20.
K. C. Tan, T. H. Lee and E. F. Khor, "Evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective optimization: Performance assessments and comparisons", Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 251-290, Jun. 2002.
21.
K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal and T. Meyarivan, "A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II", IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182-197, Apr. 2002.
22.
C. A. C. Coello, "An updated survey of GA-based multiobjective optimization techniques", ACM Comput. Surveys, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 109-143, Jun. 2000.
23.
M. Dorigo and G. D. Caro, "Ant colony optimization: A new meta-heuristic", Proc. IEEE Congr. Evol. Comput. (CEC), pp. 1470-1477, 1999.
24.
X. Wei and L. Zhi, "The multi-objective routing optimization of WSNs based on an improved ant colony algorithm", Proc. 6th IEEE Int. Conf. Wireless Commun. Netw. Mobile Comput. (WiCOM), pp. 1-4, 2010.
25.
G. Anastasi, M. Conti, M. D. Francesco and A. Passarella, "Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: A survey", Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 537-568, May 2009.
26.
S. Ehsan and B. Hamdaoui, "A survey on energy-efficient routing techniques with QoS assurances for wireless multimedia sensor networks", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 265-278, 2nd Quart. 2012.
27.
C. Sergiou, P. Antoniou and V. Vassiliou, "A comprehensive survey of congestion control protocols in wireless sensor networks", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1839-1859, 4th Quart. 2014.
28.
P. Huang, L. Xiao, S. Soltani, M. W. Mutka and N. Xi, "The evolution of MAC protocols in wireless sensor networks: A survey", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 101-120, 1st Quart. 2013.
29.
N. Li, N. Zhang, S. K. Das and B. Thuraisingham, "Privacy preservation in wireless sensor networks: A state-of-the-art survey", Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1501-1514, Nov. 2009.
30.
M. Erol-Kantarci, H. T. Mouftah and S. Oktug, "A survey of architectures and localization techniques for underwater acoustic sensor networks", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 487-502, 3rd Quart. 2011.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.