Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
The effect of surface charge decay on the variation of partial discharge location | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

The effect of surface charge decay on the variation of partial discharge location


Abstract:

The accumulation of surface charges generated by a discharge at the solid-gas interface in a void is an important factor that can affect partial discharge (PD) characteri...Show More

Abstract:

The accumulation of surface charges generated by a discharge at the solid-gas interface in a void is an important factor that can affect partial discharge (PD) characteristics. In this paper, with the help of the surface charge measurement system based on Pockels effect, the phenomenon of surface charge decay was observed by comparing its dynamic distribution during a PD sequence under variable voltage cycle. Moreover, the decay time of surface charge was measured. It is found that the decay rate of positive surface charge was much faster than that of negative one. The effect of surface charge decay on variation of partial discharge location was investigated when the voltage with variable cycle was applied. Two terms, the coincidence rate of hetero-discharge location (CRHEL) and the coincidence rate of homo-discharge location (CRHOL) were introduced to describe this effect. As the applied voltage cycle increased, CRHEL before and after voltage zero-crossing point decreased. Besides, CRHEL from a void between two dielectric surfaces (called VTD electrode) was larger than that from a void between a metal surface and a dielectric surface (called VMD electrode). Regarding VMD electrode, CRHEL for the case with negative discharges occurring in the former half-cycle was larger than that with positive discharges occurring in the former halfcycle. However, there was almost no difference about CRHEL for these two cases when VTD electrode was used. After the applied voltage cycle exceeded 500 ms, the coincidence phenomenon of homo-discharge location during negative half-cycle was observed in the usage of VMD electrode, and CRHOL became larger with voltage cycle increasing. As for VTD electrode, there was no coincidence of homo-discharge location. These results were attributed to the charge decay and the difference of discharge initiation position.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation ( Volume: 23, Issue: 4, August 2016)
Page(s): 2241 - 2249
Date of Publication: 08 September 2016

ISSN Information:

References is not available for this document.

1 Introduction

Although the discharge time lag had been assumed to be the most significant parameter causing the stochastic character of partial discharge (PD) [1], [2], surface charges at the interface between solid dielectric and gas, resulting from the previous discharges, play an important role in the characters of subsequent partial discharges (PDs) as well, which is confirmed by a large number of experimental and simulation results [3]–[5]. In detail, the surface charges can affect the electric field distribution in a void and hence the PD parameters [6]. Moreover, the production of free electrons which can initiate discharges may be also affected by residual charges [1]. However, compared with the discharge time lag, the effect of surface charge on PD characters has not attracted enough attention.

Select All
1.
R. J. Vanbrunt, "Stochastic properties of partial-discharge phenomena", IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul., vol. 26, pp. 902-948, 1991.
2.
J. P. Novak and R. Bartnikas, "Ionization and exciatation behavior in a microcavity", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 724-728, 1995.
3.
R. Patsch and F. Berton, "Pulse sequence analysis-a diagnostic tool based on the physics behind partial discharges", J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol. 35, pp. 25-32, 2002.
4.
R. J. Vanbrunt and E. W. Cernyar, "Influence of memory propagation on phase-resolved stochastic-behavior of ac-generated partial discharges", Applied Physics Letters, vol. 58, pp. 2628-2630, 1991.
5.
C. Pan, Y. P. Meng, K. Wu, Z. H. Han, K. Qin and Y. H. Cheng, "Simulation of partial discharge sequences using fluid equations", J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol. 44, pp. 255201, 2011.
6.
F. Gutfleisch and L. Niemeyer, "Measurement and simulation of PD in epoxy voids", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 2, pp. 729-743, 1995.
7.
A. Cavallini and G. C. Montanari, "Effect of supply voltage frequency on testing of insulation system", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 13, pp. 111-121, 2006.
8.
C. Forssen and H. Edin, "Partial Discharges in a Cavity at Variable Applied Frequency Part 1: Measurements", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 15, pp. 1601-1609, 2008.
9.
C. Forssen and H. Edin, "Partial Discharges in a Cavity at Variable Applied Frequency Part 2: Measurements and Modeling", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul, vol. 15, pp. 1610-1616, 2008.
10.
C. Nyamupangedengu and I. R. Jandrell, "Influence of Supply Voltage Frequency and Magnitude on PD Pulse Parameters", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 15, pp. 1590-1600, 2008.
11.
A. Cavallini, V. Krotov, G. C. Montanari, P. H. F. Morshuis and L. E. Mariut, "The role of supply frequency in the evaluation of partial discharge inception voltage in XLPE-embedded cavities", IEEE Conf. Electr. Insul. Dielectr. Phenomena (CEIDP), pp. 487-490, 2012.
12.
H. Okubo, N. Hayakawa and A. Matsushita, "The relationship between partial discharge current pulse waveforms and physical mechanisms", IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 38-45, 2002.
13.
L. E. Lundgaard, "Partial discharge-part XIV: acoustic partial discharge detection-practical application", IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 34-43, 1992.
14.
J. H. Mason, "Discharges", IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 211-238, 1978.
15.
A. Kelen and M. G. Danikas, "Evidence and presumption in PD diagnostics", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 780-795, 1995.
16.
K. Wu, C. Pan, Y. P. Meng, C. H. Sun, M. G. Gao, K. Qin, et al., "Study on the characteristics of partial discharges in voids under square voltage by detecting light emission intensity", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1651-1657, 2011.
17.
T. Hoshino, S. Maruyama, S. Ohtsuka, M. Hikita, J. Wada and S. Okabe, "Sensitivity comparison of disc- and loop-type sensors using the UHF method to detect partial discharges in GIS", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 910-916, 2012.
18.
C. Pan, K. Wu, Y. P. Meng, Y. H. Cheng and G. D. Meng, "Variation of surface charge distribution in PD sequences", IEEE Conf. Electr. Insul. Dielectr. Phenomenon (CEIDP), pp. 52-54, 2012.
19.
K. Wu, C. Pan, Y. P. Meng and Y. H. Cheng, "Dynamic behavior of surface charge distribution during partial discharge sequences", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 612-619, 2013.
20.
Y. C. Zhu, T. Takada, Y. Inoue and D. M. Tu, "Dynamic observation of needle-plane surface discharge using the electro-optical Pockels effect", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 3, pp. 460-468, 1996.
21.
C. Pan, K. Wu, Y. P. Meng and Y. H. Cheng, "Effects of photoionization and overvoltage on simultaneous discharges", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1509-1515, 2014.
22.
J. Kindersberger and C. Lederle, "Surface charge decay on insulators in air and sulfurhexafluorid-Part I: Simulation", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 15, pp. 941-948, 2008.
23.
J. Kindersberger and C. Lederle, "Surface charge decay on insulators in air and sulfurhexafluorid-Part II: Measurements", IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 15, pp. 949-957, 2008.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.