Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Using genre theory to teach students engineering lab report writing: a collaborative approach | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Using genre theory to teach students engineering lab report writing: a collaborative approach


Abstract:

Beginning Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) students often have difficulty learning the genre of lab report writing. This difficulty can be alleviated through gen...Show More

Abstract:

Beginning Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) students often have difficulty learning the genre of lab report writing. This difficulty can be alleviated through genre theory strategies and research, which writing center consultants, for example, can use to focus on the specific form and content of engineering writing, which then can be taught to students in a writing center environment. Genre theory provides a means (1) for humanities writing center consultants to learn specific characteristics about engineering writing, (2) for interdisciplinary collaboration between writing professionals and engineers to take place, and (3) for students to have increased opportunities to learn the discourse of their field. All of these benefits are enhanced by discipline-specific writing programs that support and facilitate them. In addition, the collaboration provides a stimulating, fluid, creative environment in which to discuss engineering writing, an environment which reflects the changing needs of engineering education as a result of technological advancements. As technology continues to influence engineering education, prompting evolutions in both technical and communication skills and knowledge, genre theory and interdisciplinary collaboration will continue to gain importance as strategies for initiating students into the communication demands of their field. The discussion focuses on the integration of genre theory with writing instruction in the ECE Department at the University of South Carolina. This integration stimulated interaction among ECE faculty, composition and rhetoric faculty and students, and ECE students.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication ( Volume: 42, Issue: 1, March 1999)
Page(s): 12 - 19
Date of Publication: 31 March 1999

ISSN Information:

References is not available for this document.

Select All
1.
D. Winsor, Writing Like an Engineer: A Rhetorical Education, 1996.
2.
C. Berkenkotter and T. Huckin, Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power, 1995.
3.
J. Dennett, "Australia uses genre analysis to address workplace literacy", IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 39, pp. 115-116, Sept. 1996.
4.
M. Halliday, An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 1985.
5.
The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing, 1993.
6.
"A contextual theory of language", The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing, pp. 116-136, 1993.
7.
U. McGowan, "A collaborating colleague model for inducting international engineering students into the language and culture of a foreign research environment", IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 39, pp. 117-121, Sept. 1996.
8.
Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities, 1991.
9.
Writing Teaching and Learning in the Disciplines, 1992.
10.
Writing in Nonacademic Settings, 1985.
11.
J. Swales, Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, 1990.
12.
S. Marshall, "A genre-based approach to the teaching of report-writing", English for Special Purposes, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3-13, 1991.
13.
Learning and Teaching Genre, 1994.
14.
S. Kushner, "Tackling the needs of foreign academic writers: A case study", IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 40, pp. 20-25, Mar. 1997.
15.
D. Winsor, "Communication failures contributing to the Challenger accident: An example for technical communicators", IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 31, pp. 101-108, Sept. 1988.
16.
Bordogna, "Engineering education: Innovation through integration", J. Eng. Educ., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 3-8, 1993.
17.
E. Ernst, "Workplace changes and engineering education reform", Proc. Frontiers in Education Conf., pp. 882-885, Nov. 1996.
18.
E. Baum, Engineering Education for a Changing World, 1994.
19.
Y. Lincoln and E. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry, 1985.
20.
M. Patton, "Fieldwork strategies and observation methods", Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, pp. 199-276, 1990.
21.
W. J. Potter, An Analysis of Thinking and Research about Qualitative Methods, 1996.
22.
A. Coffey and P. Atkinson, Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies, 1996.
23.
K. Walker, "The debate over generalist and specialist tutors: Genre theorys contribution", Writing Center J., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 27-46, 1998.
24.
C. Berkenkotter and T. Huckin, "News value in scientific journal articles", Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power, pp. 27-44, 1995.
25.
U. Gelinas, "Using learning communities to teach technical communication in accounting", IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 39, pp. 135-145, Sept. 1996.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.