Real-time modeling of agile fixed-wing UAV aerodynamics | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Real-time modeling of agile fixed-wing UAV aerodynamics


Abstract:

Agile UAVs is a special class of fixed-wing aircraft characterized by high thrust-to-weight ratios (around 2 to 3) and big control surfaces (around 40 to 50% chord) with ...Show More

Abstract:

Agile UAVs is a special class of fixed-wing aircraft characterized by high thrust-to-weight ratios (around 2 to 3) and big control surfaces (around 40 to 50% chord) with deflections as large as 50 degrees; and hence capable of extreme maneuvers and aerobatics. The intent of this paper is to model the aerodynamics of agile UAVs for real-time applications such as pilot-in-loop aircraft simulation, accounting for the unique geometry of the aerodynamic/control surfaces, high angles of attack encountered during maneuvers and aerobatics, and also unforeseen changes in the aerodynamics in the event of a crash/accident. Conventional modeling techniques, such as the stability derivatives approach, are not suitable due to the highly nonlinear nature of the aerodynamics and in particular because of the strong coupling of the aircraft states. Hence in the present work, a component breakdown approach is utilized to model agile UAV aerodynamics for the complete angle of attack range. Simplifications have made in the model to retain real-time functionality without losing much accuracy. For the purpose of validation, wind-tunnel testing is done for different angle of attack conditions including completely reversed flow. A good agreement between the simulation and experiments establishes the validity of the proposed approach and the aerodynamics model, with max. rms errors of ~0.15 N and 0.05 N.m in aerodynamic forces and moments.
Date of Conference: 09-12 June 2015
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 09 July 2015
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Denver, CO, USA
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The wide variety of UAVs available today can be broadly classified into either fixed-wing (conventional) UAVs or rotary-wing UAVs (such as helicopters and quadcopters). The former type has traditionally been associated with conventional cruise flight, and only the later type has been assumed to have maneuvering capabilities. This is no longer true with the recent emergence of a special class of fixed-wing UAVs called agile UAVs that, with their low weight, control surfaces as big as 50% chord, large deflections of over 50 degrees, and powerful thrusters producing high thrust-to-weight ratio of ∼2 and a strong slipstream, attain maneuverability paralleling that of rotary-wing UAVs, while retaining their capability of long distance cruise flight, see Fig. 1. As such, agile UAVs are suitable for a wide range of tasks such as conventional flight, V/STOL, hovering, perching, rapid evasive maneuvering etc.

Select All
1.
M. F. Sobolic, "Agile Flight Control Techniques for a Fixed-Wing Aircraft", 2009.
2.
K. J. Krogh, "Developing a Framework for Control of Agile Aircraft Platforms in Autonomous Hover", 2009.
3.
H. D. Blauwe, S. Bayraktar, E. Feron and F. Lokumcu, "Flight Modeling and Experimental Autonomous Hover Control of a Fixed Wing Mini-UAV at High Angle of Attack", AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit SC, Aug. 20–23, 2007.
4.
B. Johnson and R. Lind, "High Angle-of-Attack Flight Dynamics of Small UAVs", 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Jan. 5–8, 2009.
5.
H. Wu, D. Sun and Z. Zhou, "Model Identification of a Micro Air Vehicle in Loitering Flight Based on Attitude Performance Evaluation", IEEE Trans. Robotics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 702-712, Aug. 2004.
6.
D. Kubo, K. Maraoka and N. Okada, "High Angle of Attack Flight Characteristics of a Wing-In-Propeller-Slipstream Aircraft", 27th Int. Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Sept. 2010.
7.
R. Cory and R. Tedrake, "Experiments in Fixed-Wing UAV Perching", AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference, Aug. 18–21, 2008.
8.
W. Hoburg and R. Tedrake, "System Identification of Post Stall Aerodynamics for UAV Perching", AIAA Infotech@Aerospace Conf., Apr. 6–9, 2009.
9.
D. V. Uhlig and M. S. Selig, "Determining Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Micro Air Vehicle Using Motion Tracking", J. Aircraft, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1481-1490, 2013.
10.
W. E. Green and P. Y. Oh, "A Hybrid MAV for Ingress and Egress of Urban Environments", IEEE Trans. Robotics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 253-263, 2009.
11.
A. Frank, J. S. McGrew, M. Valenti, D. Levine and J. P. How, "Hover Transition and Level Flight Control Design for a Single-Propeller Indoor Airplane", AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit SC, Aug. 20–23.
12.
E. N. Johnson, M. A. Turbe, A. D. Wu, S. K. Kannan and J. C. Neidhoefer, "Flight Test Results of Autonomous Fixed-Wing UAV Transitions to and from Stationary Hover", AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Aug. 21–24.
13.
S. Roy, A. Moreau and M. Grosbois, "Modeling and Simulation of a Forward-Swept Wing Vertical Takeoff of Landing Thrust Vectored Remotely Piloted Vehicle", 2007 Canadian Aeronautics and Space Institute Annual General Meeting on Aircraft Design and Development Symposium.
14.
M. S. Selig, "Real-Time Flight Simulation of Highly Maneuverable Unmanned Aerial Vehicles", J. Aircraft, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1705-1725, Nov. 2014.
15.
F. M. Catalano, "On the Effects of an Installed Propeller Slipstream on Wing Aerodynamic Characteristics", Acta Polytechnica, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 8-14, 2004.
16.
D. Kubo and S. Suzuki, "Tail-Sitter Vertical Takeoff and Landing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: Transitional Flight Analysis", J. Aircraft, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 292-297, 2008.
17.
M. Drela, "XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils" in Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, New York:Springer-Verlag, pp. 1-12, June 1989.
18.
B. W. McCormick, Aerodynamics of V/STOL Flight, New York:Dover, pp. 96-98, 1999.
19.
W. Khan and M. Nahon, "Development and Validation of a Propeller Slipstream Model for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles", J. Aircraft.
20.
B. W. McCormick, Aerodynamics Aeronautics and Flight Mechanics, New York:John Wiley Sons, pp. 3-4, 1995.
21.
J. L. Tangler, "Insight into a Wind Turbine Stall and Post-Stall Aerodynamics", Wind Energy, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 247-260, Sept. 2004.
22.
S. F. Hoerner, B. Henry and V, "Fluid-Dynamic Lift: Practical Information on Aerodynamic and Hydrodynamic Lift", STI/Recon Technical Report A 76, vol. 32167, 1975.
23.
C. Lindenburg, "Stall Coefficients", 2010 IEA Symposium on the Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines National Renewable Energy Lab.
24.
S. Young and F. Donald, "Blade Section Lift Coefficients for Propellers at Extreme Off-Design Conditions", Dec. 1997.
25.
J. G. Leishman, Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics, New York:Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.